Special Forces; The forgotten game?

2006-07-06 04:49:07

#26

baggy98: Member; +0|6731

i prefer playing SF but find it really hard 2 find a server in the uk aswell, its either full or empty no half full servers. and i havnt seen any1 on Devils Perch for months (fav map).

SF is a better game design and is far more fair, more so than vanilla. there is too many plane/hello whores. i have seen a que of 8 peeple for 1 plane and then the TK`s happen. i just cant be bothered wit that. SF all the way

2006-07-06 04:50:34

#27

DSRTurtle: Member; +56|6904

Asianwaste wrote:
It pisses me off that SF maps and vanilla maps can't be in one server map cycle. I get it that technically it's a modification but DICE could've put in a little more consideration that sometimes people still like to play the vanilla maps w/o switching to another server.

I agree about being able to mix the maps between sf and vanilla. I'd love to see more maps for SF as well. Most of the new ones should be infrantry only maps, no Armor, no Helos.

2006-07-06 04:55:04

#28

baggy98: Member; +0|6731

it would ideal if SF was on Vanilla servers much the same way as EF and AF

2006-07-06 05:09:54

#29

spawnofthemist: Banned; +1,128|6860|Burmecia, Land of the Rain

imdead wrote:
Leave my SF alone!! Go back to the Karkand you whores It takes more skill to even put SF in the CD tray than to play Karkand...

congratulations mate.. you've just made it into my sig as "Quote of the Week"

2006-07-06 05:21:00

#30

Reaper2325: Member; +2|6942|New Hartford, New York

I prefer SF myself mainly because of the Zips and grapples. If you use them properly, you can move throughout a map very easily.

It would be nice to see more SF maps, or even SF versions of vBF2 maps. Even AF maps like Operation Road Rage and Midnight Sun could be more fun with zips.

2006-07-06 05:27:03

#31

Sea_JayUK: Member; +19|6742|Notts

Asianwaste wrote:
It pisses me off that SF maps and vanilla maps can't be in one server map cycle. I get it that technically it's a modification but DICE could've put in a little more consideration that sometimes people still like to play the vanilla maps w/o switching to another server.

Wouldnt you have to change discs to do that?

Last edited by Sea_JayUK (2006-07-06 05:28:37)

2006-07-06 05:27:12

#32

X3M*Selkie: Member; +13|6796|Belgium

joker3327 wrote:
I would like to see a purely Urban Warfare Map......house clearing, tunnels... woods...trenches.....you would have to work as a team then...lol.....smurfs would become target practise lol..

Fully support that idea!

2006-07-06 05:28:59

#33

Asianwaste: Member; +7|6724

Reaper2325 wrote:
It would be nice to see more SF maps, or even SF versions of vBF2 maps. Even AF maps like Operation Road Rage and Midnight Sun could be more fun with zips.

Wonder if you could zip from a little bird?

2006-07-06 05:30:15

#34

Asianwaste: Member; +7|6724

Sea_JayUK wrote:
Asianwaste wrote:
It pisses me off that SF maps and vanilla maps can't be in one server map cycle. I get it that technically it's a modification but DICE could've put in a little more consideration that sometimes people still like to play the vanilla maps w/o switching to another server.
Wouldnt you have to change discs to do that?

Nope, I run my vanilla just fine with my SF disc.

2006-07-06 05:49:05

#35

Bernadictus: Moderator; +1,055|6955

My SF DVD hasn't been out of his DVD tray since I installed it, and I banish anyone who tries to remove it from my pc!

2006-07-06 05:49:43

#36

N)!(NDarkDragon: Banned; +158|6741

I play SF alot. Mostly warlord on high points though.

2006-07-06 06:40:16

#37

Longbow: Member; +163|6865|Odessa, Ukraine

Bernadictus wrote:
My SF DVD hasn't been out of his DVD tray since I installed it, and I banish anyone who tries to remove it from my pc!

Usage of ISO-miniimages is better

2006-07-06 07:00:24

#38

scotdabody1: Member; +0|6724

we need more SF servers, its pretty lame getting a server list of 80 or so and only 2 of them are close or they are full, 64 person servers, and are limited to only one map. Why not all the maps and why dont more servers play night maps, they are so much fun.

2006-07-06 07:11:05

#39

docnutz: Member; +39|6978|B O S T ON area

a subway map for SF's

2006-07-06 07:25:28

#40

imdead: Death StatPadder; +228|6987|Human Meat Shield

Okay..okay .. fine... 24/7 night maps....hows that?? 50 man server brand new... (used to be Karkwhore)

Anyone interested?? Or you want ALL night maps??

https://www.game-monitor.com/server-stat-image/0/FFFFFF/000000/0000FF/000000/208.64.64.61:16567.png

Last edited by imdead (2006-07-06 07:37:41)

2006-07-06 07:29:32

#41

topthrill05: Member; +125|6796|Rochester NY USA

Devils Perch owns all maps. Sadly no one plays it.

2006-07-06 07:39:53

#42

Bernadictus: Moderator; +1,055|6955

topthrill05 wrote:
Devils Perch owns all maps. Sadly no one plays it.

I do, I love that map, it is anti-armor heaven!

2006-07-06 07:52:34

#43

ZCaliber: Member; +12|6730|Between Canada and Iowa

It's a tad questionable how they made Nightvision have a 'battery bar'...

I mean... The thing recharges slower than continental drift, and once it's run out it's down there until you die. ;( I rather like the night maps, they're a little annoying sure (The stairs leading up to the asylum in Devil's Perch anyone? 'Nade spamburgers!), but what BF2 map isn't in their own way?

24/7 Ghost and Warlord servers abound, but not one running 24/7 night maps that I can see. =\ I really do hope they make new SF maps.

I'll tell you why they didn't make SF variants of the original BF2 maps: Lazyness. They'd have to make new models for the China special forces and to a lesser degree 're-code' the maps. -_-;;

Cheers to Dice Canada for making a Special Forces Aerial ribbon, but cutting all the maps that have aircraft. They really can be such neophytes. And a general cheers to EA, for obvious reasons.

2006-07-06 07:56:28

#44

imdead: Death StatPadder; +228|6987|Human Meat Shield

ZCaliber wrote:
It's a tad questionable how they made Nightvision have a 'battery bar'...

I mean... The thing recharges slower than continental drift, and once it's run out it's down there until you die. ;( I rather like the night maps, they're a little annoying sure (The stairs leading up to the asylum in Devil's Perch anyone? 'Nade spamburgers!), but what BF2 map isn't in their own way?

24/7 Ghost and Warlord servers abound, but not one running 24/7 night maps that I can see. =\ I really do hope they make new SF maps.

I'll tell you why they didn't make SF variants of the original BF2 maps: Lazyness. They'd have to make new models for the China special forces and to a lesser degree 're-code' the maps. -_-;;

Cheers to Dice Canada for making a Special Forces Aerial ribbon, but cutting all the maps that have aircraft. They really can be such neophytes. And a general cheers to EA, for obvious reasons.

Fresh Off the Press....good until it crashes or 1.4 comes out with the new improved non-server crash, or if I get bored and move it again...

2006-07-06 08:37:13

#45

HM1{N}: Member; +86|6863|East Coast via Los Angeles, CA

ZCaliber wrote:
It's a tad questionable how they made Nightvision have a 'battery bar'...

I mean... The thing recharges slower than continental drift, and once it's run out it's down there until you die. ;( I rather like the night maps, they're a little annoying sure (The stairs leading up to the asylum in Devil's Perch anyone? 'Nade spamburgers!), but what BF2 map isn't in their own way?

24/7 Ghost and Warlord servers abound, but not one running 24/7 night maps that I can see. =\ I really do hope they make new SF maps.

I'll tell you why they didn't make SF variants of the original BF2 maps: Lazyness. They'd have to make new models for the China special forces and to a lesser degree 're-code' the maps. -_-;;

Cheers to Dice Canada for making a Special Forces Aerial ribbon, but cutting all the maps that have aircraft. They really can be such neophytes. And a general cheers to EA, for obvious reasons.

You have to learn when to use it and when not to...

2006-07-06 09:33:42

#46

Reaper2325: Member; +2|6942|New Hartford, New York

docnutz wrote:
a subway map for SF's

That sounds like it would be fun . Just imagine the possibilites with a map based on Madison Square Gardens/Penn Station/ NY Metro Subway .

Actually, a SF map based in mid-town Manhattean could be fun. Zip line off the Empire State Building, stop the MEC from advancing throught the Lincoln Tunnel. Then again, it would prob end up like another Karkland.

2006-07-06 09:34:47

#47

tvmissleman: The Cereal Killer; +201|6877| United States of America

i dont like SF its to laggy for me

2006-07-06 09:41:15

#48

SiMSaM16: Member; +48|6912|United States of America

First off, EA is retarded.

Secondly, Special Forces is not forgotten. Its just in better shape than vanilla BF2 thats why they arent focusing on it (perhaps).

Thirdly, if you want 3 new maps, you better pull the $10 out of your pocket.

Lastly, Road To Jalalabad. Im suprised it was free. EA finally pulled their head out of their butt and decided to do public beta testing. 1.4 is probably going to be the last patch to fix all the problems so they can work on BF 2142.

2006-07-06 10:13:02

#49

Rumfuddle: Member; +14|6936

docnutz wrote:
a subway map for SF's

That is a fine idea for either vanilla or sf. So many interesting opportunities for maps go unnoticed by EA. Fight in China, but no battle in Tiananmen Square? EF without a city map duking it out in around the Brandenberg gates in Berlin?

Last edited by Rumfuddle (2006-07-06 10:13:27)

2006-07-06 12:28:44

#50

Bratwurstschnecke: Member; +77|6895|respawn screen

SF is the best part of BF2, however I would like some of the new features (like Little Birds instead of Apache/Hind on Ghost Town or Mass Destruction) and NEW MAPS of course. I'm about 40hrs away from all the SF-Medals so I need new armies...

BF2S Forums Special Forces; The forgotten game?

Asianwaste wrote:

imdead wrote:

Asianwaste wrote:

joker3327 wrote:

Reaper2325 wrote:

Sea_JayUK wrote:

Asianwaste wrote:

Bernadictus wrote:

topthrill05 wrote:

ZCaliber wrote:

ZCaliber wrote:

docnutz wrote:

docnutz wrote:

Board footer