Koreans preparing to launch more missiles

2006-07-05 18:40:45

#1

Spumantiii: pistolero; +147|6923|Canada

CBC news
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/ … korea.html
the missiles and launch site
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/dprk/facility/nodong.htm

Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-07-05 18:42:06)

2006-07-05 18:42:39

#2

*TS*tphai: The Forum Alien; +89|7047|The planet Tophet

i hope china bombs the shit out of N.korea

2006-07-05 18:45:06

#3

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6915|Canberra, AUS

I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2006-07-05 18:46:23

#4

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6778|Long Island, New York

Spark wrote:
I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.

Agreed.

Speaking that there was CONCRETE PROOF that NK had weapons, but not Iraq. Good job, Bush.

Of course, if NK fired ANY missle from us, our deflectors from space would shoot them down and we'd nuke NK.

2006-07-05 18:47:06

#5

*TS*tphai: The Forum Alien; +89|7047|The planet Tophet

"the battle for planet earth is just around the corner"

2006-07-05 18:48:50

#6

splixx: ChupaCABRA; +53|6980|Omaha, Nebraska

Spark wrote:
I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.

Because they can actually fight back?

2006-07-05 18:51:01

#7

TrollmeaT: Aspiring Objectivist; +492|6913|Colorado

Bring on the missiles , I'm tired of all this bluffing.

Last edited by TrollmeaT (2006-07-05 18:51:41)

2006-07-05 18:51:55

#8

S3v3N: lolwut?; +685|6759|Montucky

Team America.. FUCK YEAH!!

2006-07-05 18:53:37

#9

Sondernkommando: Member; +22|6957

North Korea is literally starving its people to death. The U.S. gives food in order to extract concessions, but it just leads to the same things happening - only later on.

2006-07-05 18:54:03

#10

Spearhead: Gulf coast redneck hippy; +731|6931|Tampa Bay Florida

I would call Bush a pussy, but I won't. I mean, NK has only been oppressing and starving their people since WW2, but I guess there's one of either two reasons we haven't invaded North Korea

1) Bush is chickenshit and is one hell of a hypocrite

2) The Bush administration respects people from the Middle East more than people in the East

Last edited by Spearhead (2006-07-05 18:54:45)

2006-07-05 19:01:10

#11

BornToKill67: It's a good day to die; +18|6901|Canada Eh?

Spark wrote:
I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.

Yea, me too the U.S should just pull out of Iraq and focus on their defence. I'm predicting that after the U.S pulls out of Iraq (they're getting whooped IMO), the U.S will go and attack North Korea. After a bit, North Korea will be dumbasses and launch their nuclear warheads towards the U.S.. Then the war will escalade into a nuclear world war and it will probably be the oriental countries vs. the rest of the world.

Those are my 2 cents and I am sorry if I offended anyone.

2006-07-05 19:02:12

#12

JaMDuDe: Member; +69|7018

Poseidon wrote:
Spark wrote:
I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.
Agreed.

Speaking that there was CONCRETE PROOF that NK had weapons, but not Iraq. Good job, Bush.

Of course, if NK fired ANY missle from us, our deflectors from space would shoot them down and we'd nuke NK.

We dont have anti-missle space deflectors. Nice imagination though

2006-07-05 19:04:01

#13

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6915|Canberra, AUS

JaMDuDe wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
Spark wrote:
I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.
Agreed.

Speaking that there was CONCRETE PROOF that NK had weapons, but not Iraq. Good job, Bush.

Of course, if NK fired ANY missle from us, our deflectors from space would shoot them down and we'd nuke NK.
We dont have anti-missle space deflectors. Nice imagination though

Really?

Then why have I seen three news articles from US TV talking about an anti-missle defence?

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2006-07-05 19:05:25

#14

vanmani: Unintentionally Verbose; +26|6832|Australia

*TS*tphai wrote:
i hope china bombs the shit out of N.korea

I seem to recall last time North Korea was being naughty China sent in a quarter of a million troops to defend them?

Dunno why, the remaining communist countries wanna stick together? I'm no expert on this. I just have the feeling that the US hasn't already hit N.Korea with a pre-emptive strike because the risk of China getting involved is too high.

2006-07-05 19:06:23

#15

kr@cker: Bringin' Sexy Back!; +581|6790|Southeastern USA

We could have had the defense system if those idiot dems and the whining pussies at the UN hadn't blocked Reagan's Star Wars program, seems they were afraid someone might build a missile that could avoid it....

(shits himself)

kinda like telling all the members of a SWAT team no to wear kevlar vests becaus someone might shoot at them with armor piercing bullets.

Last edited by kr@cker (2006-07-05 19:07:47)

2006-07-05 19:10:01

#16

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6915|Canberra, AUS

vanmani wrote:
*TS*tphai wrote:
i hope china bombs the shit out of N.korea
I seem to recall last time North Korea was being naughty China sent in a quarter of a million troops to defend them?

Dunno why, the remaining communist countries wanna stick together? I'm no expert on this. I just have the feeling that the US hasn't already hit N.Korea with a pre-emptive strike because the risk of China getting involved is too high.

That was forty years ago. A lot - and I mean A LOT has changed. Espiecially China - they are now highly US/Western-oriented.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2006-07-05 19:14:04

#17

SoC./Omega: Member; +122|6782|Omaha, Nebraska!

Spark wrote:
JaMDuDe wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
Agreed.

Speaking that there was CONCRETE PROOF that NK had weapons, but not Iraq. Good job, Bush.

Of course, if NK fired ANY missle from us, our deflectors from space would shoot them down and we'd nuke NK.
We dont have anti-missle space deflectors. Nice imagination though
Really?

Then why have I seen three news articles from US TV talking about an anti-missle defence?

they have, its a boeing747 with a ginormus lazer infront that targets the weak spots of the nuke and the nuke self distructs after a couple seconds

damn this sucks i dont want ww3 especially if china is involved, damn you china if you side with NK i will freak

Last edited by SoC./Omega (2006-07-05 19:15:57)

2006-07-05 19:27:23

#18

Lib-Sl@yer: Member; +32|6954|Wherever the F**k i feel like

d4rkph03n1x wrote:
You know that nostradamus predicted THREE world wars, not two.

No man can predict the future.

2006-07-05 19:46:00

#19

spastic bullet: would like to know if you are on crack; +77|6781|vancouver

Fucking calm down already.

I think things are going to have to get a bit more desperate than this, for NK to decide tossing an ICBM in the general direction of North America is a good idea. Think they don't know what would happen? Please.

LOLz at the Nostradamus, btw... Got a quote for that?

2006-07-05 19:53:26

#20

JaMDuDe: Member; +69|7018

Spark wrote:
JaMDuDe wrote:
Poseidon wrote:

Agreed.

Speaking that there was CONCRETE PROOF that NK had weapons, but not Iraq. Good job, Bush.

Of course, if NK fired ANY missle from us, our deflectors from space would shoot them down and we'd nuke NK.
We dont have anti-missle space deflectors. Nice imagination though
Really?

Then why have I seen three news articles from US TV talking about an anti-missle defence?

We do have a missle defence, its from the ground and sea.

2006-07-05 20:00:08

#21

topthrill05: Member; +125|6819|Rochester NY USA

Poseidon wrote:
Spark wrote:
I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.
Agreed.

Speaking that there was CONCRETE PROOF that NK had weapons, but not Iraq. Good job, Bush.

Of course, if NK fired ANY missle from us, our deflectors from space would shoot them down and we'd nuke NK.

No dumb ass. NK is allies with China. We can't just walk right in and take them over.

There would be some issues. Stop watching liberal media and learn some facts on your own.

NK is not a threat anymore than Iraq was.

2006-07-05 20:00:16

#22

Lib-Sl@yer: Member; +32|6954|Wherever the F**k i feel like

JaMDuDe wrote:
Spark wrote:
JaMDuDe wrote:

We dont have anti-missle space deflectors. Nice imagination though
Really?

Then why have I seen three news articles from US TV talking about an anti-missle defence?
We do have a missle defence, its from the ground and sea.

Actually we do but the are for laser guided missles like China and russia have. All it is is a little beam shot from space to make the bomb go into the ocean

2006-07-05 20:14:50

#23

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6770|Global Command

Lib-Sl@yer wrote:
d4rkph03n1x wrote:
You know that nostradamus predicted THREE world wars, not two.
No man can predict the future.

Nostradamus did.

2006-07-05 21:26:32

#24

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6915|Canberra, AUS

topthrill05 wrote:
Poseidon wrote:
Spark wrote:
I'm starting to get edgy now.

And I'm starting to wonder why the fuck we spent so much on Iraq qhen the REAL threat - military threat - is North Korea.
Agreed.

Speaking that there was CONCRETE PROOF that NK had weapons, but not Iraq. Good job, Bush.

Of course, if NK fired ANY missle from us, our deflectors from space would shoot them down and we'd nuke NK.
No dumb ass. NK is allies with China. We can't just walk right in and take them over.

There would be some issues. Stop watching liberal media and learn some facts on your own.

NK is not a threat anymore than Iraq was.

"Learn some facts of your own"

I find this statement very odd in light of what you said.

North Korea is allied with China. Yes, that's true.

HOWEVER, so is the US. Want proof?

Look under any common object and 9 times out of 10 it will say 'Made in China'. Even your 'American'-made stuff is made from imported materials.

There is a MASSIVE trade relationship here. China is wise enough not to damage it.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2006-07-05 21:27:50

#25

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6915|Canberra, AUS

Alexanderthegrape wrote:
Lib-Sl@yer wrote:
d4rkph03n1x wrote:
You know that nostradamus predicted THREE world wars, not two.
No man can predict the future.
Nostradamus did.

He predicted the world would end in 1999AD. It's now 2006AD. Unless 'AD' means something completely different to him, I think we can leave this in the region of crackpot conspiracies.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

BF2S Forums Koreans preparing to launch more missiles

Spark wrote:

Spark wrote:

Spark wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Spark wrote:

JaMDuDe wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Spark wrote:

TStphai wrote:

vanmani wrote:

TStphai wrote:

Spark wrote:

JaMDuDe wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

d4rkph03n1x wrote:

Spark wrote:

JaMDuDe wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Spark wrote:

JaMDuDe wrote:

Spark wrote:

JaMDuDe wrote:

Lib-Sl@yer wrote:

d4rkph03n1x wrote:

topthrill05 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Spark wrote:

Alexanderthegrape wrote:

Lib-Sl@yer wrote:

d4rkph03n1x wrote:

Board footer