Thx..
95 if hit in the chest, 190 if hit in the head.redhawk454 wrote:
If they boost the infantry HP then they ought to fix the .50 cal. sniper rifle. mines broke,lol. Always takes 2 shots to kill even though the damage is 190.
But yes, a REAL .50 cal should be something like 587318945145428756834756418576342563287456325² damage if hit anywhere...
then a real grenade will kill from 10 metres shrapnel ftw!Defiance wrote:
95 if hit in the chest, 190 if hit in the head.redhawk454 wrote:
If they boost the infantry HP then they ought to fix the .50 cal. sniper rifle. mines broke,lol. Always takes 2 shots to kill even though the damage is 190.
But yes, a REAL .50 cal should be something like 587318945145428756834756418576342563287456325² damage if hit anywhere...
infantry mod... does that mean booster pack? does that mean people whom are rich and have a creditcard get a advantage above poorer people?
Does that mean money is more than a fair game? does that mean ea's next release will be hacks for battlefield for money?
Does that mean money is more than a fair game? does that mean ea's next release will be hacks for battlefield for money?
yes money will give an advantage. look at the worlds armys, lmao.SniperF0x wrote:
infantry mod... does that mean booster pack? does that mean people whom are rich and have a creditcard get a advantage above poorer people?
Does that mean money is more than a fair game? does that mean ea's next release will be hacks for battlefield for money?
I concur, medics would become god.SargeJp wrote:
they shouldn't put more hit points in infantry mode... it would be a bad idea.
and?thrasher1210 wrote:
http://www.ea.com/official/battlefield/battlefield2/us/editorial.jsp?src=communityupdate_061606
its from the 16th?
YOU LOST ME!
I think there might be another map coming out called Umm Qasr Docks or something. I saw it running on a server last night, but I don't think it was an EA test server.
that clan sucks ballsalter_ego wrote:
I read this on a clan site ( I didnt think it was real till I seen the clip)
Heres the link
http://www.criminally-respected.com/htm … 4872#14872
1.4 will be BETA (open source)
Fixed the Karkand exploit of being able to get inside the hotel
new map is being sponsored by gamespy (will be FREE)
infantry only MOD is being tested and might be released for the open beta test and the infantry only game mode boosts player hitpoints and removes all vehicles.
Then could it be someone's custom map. I hear there's this whole underground community that does shit like that, but I don't know. I don't think they're real. I heard they were called Boggers, or Lodders, or Mobbers, or something.-Gunsmoke- wrote:
I think there might be another map coming out called Umm Qasr Docks or something. I saw it running on a server last night, but I don't think it was an EA test server.
I simply would join that criminally-respected clan just because of they're slogan 'We're kind of a big deal'
Some groups have noticed the testing of a new map "Road to Jalalabad" being run on our test servers. This map will be included in our next patch release and is not part of a new booster pack. Some of the items on the change list for this next step are:
Reversion: Allowing unlocks on unranked servers
Fix/Reversion: We fixed the issue preventing mod teams from running multiple game modes in one map list.
Tuning: We have lowered the number of players needed to start a ranked game.
Tuning: We have made some modifications to the vehicle drop feature introduced in 1.3. These changes should reduce the overall impact of "cartillery" on game play.
Crash Fix: We have located and fixed a crash connected to 1.3.
Reversion: Allowing unlocks on unranked servers
Fix/Reversion: We fixed the issue preventing mod teams from running multiple game modes in one map list.
Tuning: We have lowered the number of players needed to start a ranked game.
Tuning: We have made some modifications to the vehicle drop feature introduced in 1.3. These changes should reduce the overall impact of "cartillery" on game play.
Crash Fix: We have located and fixed a crash connected to 1.3.
If they've locaed the 1.3 crash and fixed it, why can't they just fucking release the fix. Yes, new maps are nice, but just release the crash fix as it's getting fucking ridiculous. Seeing as they have said it's already been fixed.
Fucking common sense, they don't even have that.
Fucking common sense, they don't even have that.
AGREE with you FIX THE dam game then give us the goodies!Mekstizzle wrote:
If they've locaed the 1.3 crash and fixed it, why can't they just fucking release the fix. Yes, new maps are nice, but just release the crash fix as it's getting fucking ridiculous. Seeing as they have said it's already been fixed.
Fucking common sense, they don't even have that.
They just CANT fix it
lol. 1.4
I say they fuck the patches and release "BF3" lol..
Would be cheaper for them too. Lol.
I say they fuck the patches and release "BF3" lol..
Would be cheaper for them too. Lol.
If there are no vehicles on the map, how can it be agaist the ROE? The ROE says that admins can not limit the use of vehicles, if they are not in the map, then admins can not break the ROE.BolvisOculus wrote:
isnt roe rules kinda redundent? anyway, ya it is, but i guess since its officaly another type of gameplay, its legal (i would assume only if you play infantry only, makeshift ifantry only playing conquest would probably still be illeagal)chuuby wrote:
infantry only hmm isnt that against those gay ass roe rules
Would be a good idea if it was solely infantry - would make firefights more interesting.SargeJp wrote:
they shouldn't put more hit points in infantry mode... it would be a bad idea.
Well said...Ea makes the rules so let them deal this the issues it casues!dubbs wrote:
If there are no vehicles on the map, how can it be agaist the ROE? The ROE says that admins can not limit the use of vehicles, if they are not in the map, then admins can not break the ROE.BolvisOculus wrote:
isnt roe rules kinda redundent? anyway, ya it is, but i guess since its officaly another type of gameplay, its legal (i would assume only if you play infantry only, makeshift ifantry only playing conquest would probably still be illeagal)chuuby wrote:
infantry only hmm isnt that against those gay ass roe rules
i was in a map today strike at karkand. and got kicked for being in an apc. the funny thing is i just got in it at the hotel flag. someone drove it from the marine base. hows that for roe rulez.