137[CSi]
Headshot Specialist
+104|7129|Woodland Hills, Ca

SuB wrote:

137[CSi] wrote:

Friluftshund wrote:

1 gig works

2 gig is better

4 gig http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/2134/wub7lg.gif
I have 4 gigs...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v46/o … eover2.jpg
so why does it say total physical memory 2.75GB?
Because if you asked a positive question before giving someone negative karma for being a fuckstick then you would've been able to read where 3dmark reports all 4 slots being filled with 1024mb of ddr 333 which in actuality is ddr400 but due to the on die memory controller of the athlong x2 processor it retards the ram to a 2t timing rate and slows it down to ddr333 which with some modification and overclocking and possibly the use of a divider I could get it to run at 400 speeds.

I just have never been inspired enough to play with it. This is an older screen shot when I was running windows xp professional which cannot handle more than 2.75 gigs of ram physically. It allocate the remainder 15 as a hard page file and thats why it doesnt report 3.

If the computer doesnt detect you have enough ram it will show the proper amount and use the page file on your computer itself to run buffered functions off of.

Please read the screenshot information before being a fucking asshole because that was totally uncalled for. You could've simply pm'ed me and asked why it says there is only 2.75.

You shouldn't even stick your head in this section of the forums because you have already shown your non capacity for intellegence you fucking puke.
smtt686
this is the best we can do?
+95|6923|USA
ok heres my problem,  i have hp zv6000 laptop, with 128 ati radeon express 200m with 128meg, 2gb mem.  winxp, i can run bf2 on some maps really well such as karkand, mashtuur and sharqui.  however, i cannot run any other maps. i get really low frame rates.  any suggestions, other than replacing my laptop since i dont think there is a way to upgrade the video card?
Fosterthelegend
:)
+97|6907|Kent, UK
to be honest when i changed from 1 to do i didn't notice that much of a change
the first load up is much quicker (always get tank ftw) but i still get a fair ammount of lag on non-uk servers
I think theis is my poor internet conncetion though as i live in the middle of nowhere
So i would upgrade your internet before RAM
nelson496
Member
+3|7077
I added an extra gig to make mine 2 gigs and the choppiness is gone and I am the first one on the server.
SuB
Member
+50|6968

137[CSi] wrote:

SuB wrote:

so why does it say total physical memory 2.75GB?
Because if you asked a positive question before giving someone negative karma for being a fuckstick then you would've been able to read where 3dmark reports all 4 slots being filled with 1024mb of ddr 333 which in actuality is ddr400 but due to the on die memory controller of the athlong x2 processor it retards the ram to a 2t timing rate and slows it down to ddr333 which with some modification and overclocking and possibly the use of a divider I could get it to run at 400 speeds.

I just have never been inspired enough to play with it. This is an older screen shot when I was running windows xp professional which cannot handle more than 2.75 gigs of ram physically. It allocate the remainder 15 as a hard page file and thats why it doesnt report 3.

If the computer doesnt detect you have enough ram it will show the proper amount and use the page file on your computer itself to run buffered functions off of.

Please read the screenshot information before being a fucking asshole because that was totally uncalled for. You could've simply pm'ed me and asked why it says there is only 2.75.

You shouldn't even stick your head in this section of the forums because you have already shown your non capacity for intellegence you fucking puke.
ok firstly... i didn't negative karma saying your a fuckstick
i read the 3dmark thing saying all 4 slots full not a problem
i also read the system thing which said 2.75GB
and also the 3dmark report saying 2.75GB
i only asked WHY i didn't fucking negative karma you over it ffs
i ALSO noticed you have an SLI-Premium, the same as my board which after your done ranting FULLY FUCKING SUPPORTS 4GB OF RAM, SO does XP PRO
there are options in the bios which you just switch on and hey presto
so before you start slagging me off over something i asked a friggin question about think about what i actually posted, why the hell would i call u a fuckstick over it?! jeesus
gimme my friggin karma back it was hardly negated that you blow off at me is it i asked you a question, after fully studying the screenshot, and noticing a few points on it
and xp can, happily, handle upto 16GB of ram, just to point that out to you. it's the hardware you have setup wrong at the moment..
take a chill pill, come back, apologise, and maybe i could help you sort out your hardware before you start calling more people fucking pukes, when your talking completely out of your arse
lolerzorz
Member
+0|6820
2Gb ftw
THA
im a fucking .....well not now
+609|7062|AUS, Canberra

137[CSi] wrote:

Because if you asked a positive question before giving someone negative karma for being a fuckstick
the neg you have saying that isn't even from this thread.

and replying to who you think gave you neg with this.

137[CSi] wrote:

learn how to read you fucking dipshit.
doesn't help your cause.

anymore posts in here talking about karma will be deleted.
137[CSi]
Headshot Specialist
+104|7129|Woodland Hills, Ca

SuB wrote:

ok firstly... i didn't negative karma saying your a fuckstick
Never said you did. I will clarify since I didn't use proper punctuation... you were being a fuckstick by performing assumed action being you quoted my post and then made a retarded remark.

i read the 3dmark thing saying all 4 slots full not a problem
i also read the system thing which said 2.75GB
and also the 3dmark report saying 2.75GB
i ALSO noticed you have an SLI-Premium, the same as my board which after your done ranting FULLY FUCKING SUPPORTS 4GB OF RAM, SO does XP PRO
No it doesnt, you get me a screenshot of the 32 bit version of windows XP pro showing a full working 4 gigs of ram in that screen and I will take back anything I said and give you your dues back. I've researched it for weeks upon weeks even to the point where I figured it was just the shitty support of the Asus BIOS that lacked the ability for the Ram to show in windows.

I had the MOBO flashed to the latest version and in post it showed 4 gigs of ram, in 3d mark it showed 4 gigs of ram, in memtest86 it showed 4 gigs of ram. But unfortunately the x86 xp pro operating system DOES NOT support more than 3 gigs of ram. XP x64 Professional aka WINDOWS SERVER 2003 supports 16 gigs of ram with the right hardware.

I even went as far as purchasing a DFI Lanparty NF4-UT SLI Expert and tweaked the shit out of the Bios on that and still no 4 gigs of ram. I originally sold those two gigs of ram due to the limitations of my processor not being able to properly allocate them because of the limitations of the on die memory controller and lack of water cooling to overvolt the processor and overclock everything so at least it was working as if there was 4 gigs of ram.

To no avail I still got 3.10 gigs of ram and gave up.

I then got an ATI x3200 chipset motherboard the ASUS A8R32-MVP (crossfire mobo) because I was having issues with my periphials and the NF4 chipset not liking them too much, mainly the xfi and the ati x1900xt I am now running when I sold my 7800gtx due to the lack of availability for a matching card.

I am now running Windows XP x64 (Windows Server 2003 with a new GUI basically) and it still shows as 2.75 but there is nowhere in the bios of my current motherboard to turn on the extra API mem support so until Asus updates that I am screwed in that department. But for the most part I do notice the difference in loading times. But then again I am decrypting dvd's in the background as well as when my game is loading.

I would be more than glad to frap an example of me doing all of these functions and still being the first to load a map on a server.

4 gigs of ram is overkill but I do a lot of video editing and photo editing with my machine and prefer not to use page files on my raptors or my storage drives so the shit is pre fetched into the extra two gigs of ram and I can allocate a nice hunkmeg size to bf2 in its start up command w/o affecting other programs.


and xp can, happily, handle upto 16GB of ram, just to point that out to you. it's the hardware you have setup wrong at the moment..
I dont need you to google it and show me an example..... you do it and report back and tell me how easy it is? Tell me what dividers you ran on the memory with what timings. And then, maybe then I wont mistake such a silly and incomplete comment as an act of asshattery on your part.

Last edited by 137[CSi] (2006-06-13 11:02:53)

xixspyder
AnthraX
+25|6865

Cohammer wrote:

well when ever i load the game it runs really choppy. but smooths out later on
same for me.
SargeJp
Member
+87|7042|Canada
1 Go is well enough. Get a better video card or a better processor. BF2 runs 500-600 MB of RAM.
Memory doesn't decrease the *loading* time if you have 2 Go.

**edit**: for people who says it increases a difference to move 1 Go to 2 Go, did you check the speed of your new RAM setting?? 200 MHZ? 400 MHZ?

The speed of the RAM will mostly determine the time it takes to load something.

Last edited by SargeJp (2006-06-13 11:11:18)

[OvC]_AMD_Man
Member
+2|7107|England
137[CSi] is completely right, while the hardware might support 4gb of ram the software doesn't

also regarding 2T and DDR333, this was fixed with the release of the venice and san diego core cpus, they no longer have to run 4 sticks at DDR333, but the 2T issue is still there

also regarding the 2Gb of ram for bf2, i highly reccommend it, i downgraded from 1.5Gb to 1Gb due to athlon64 not supporting 3 sticks, and the loading times / jerkyness at start of rounds shot up, with 1.5gb it was silky smooth

Last edited by [OvC]_AMD_Man (2006-06-13 11:12:25)

gazzie
Pulls out gun, Watch him run
+39|7014|England
Never had a problem with the 1GB of RAM i am currently using. Although considering you guys are saying its better to buy extra ram i might get prepared just before BF2142 comes out.
lion8420
Member
+0|6845
Take a look at this...

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx

It looks like this may answer the 4gb question.  Sorry if this is not a link (you may have to copy and paste).  This is my first post here
Cbass
Kick His Ass!
+371|6986|Howell, Mi USA

xixspyder wrote:

Cohammer wrote:

well when ever i load the game it runs really choppy. but smooths out later on
same for me.
Same here, i have 1 Gig 2x 512mb Crucial @ 533mhz. But i was thinking about upgrading to maybe 1.5 Gig just kuz i get sick of spawning late in a game only to be killed while I'm waiting for the choppiness to go away. 1.5 would be a nice improvement and cost effective
https://bf3s.com/sigs/bb53a522780eff5b30ba3252d44932cc2f5b8c4f.png
SuB
Member
+50|6968
from that link
Windows XP Professional and Windows Server 2003 Memory Support. The maximum amount of memory that can be supported on Windows XP Professional and Windows Server 2003 is also 4 GB

mayeb you should keep up that punctuation, might make you look less like an asshat then?

screw you for help i aitn takin shit off you and pointing you in any right direction. as posted the karma you gave out was totaly unrequired and stupid, so take your 4Gb and shuv it, i initially asked a question and as usual all you got is hate, well FUCK you sir. put that through your narrow minded face and pull it out the other side

Last edited by SuB (2006-06-13 11:33:17)

THA
im a fucking .....well not now
+609|7062|AUS, Canberra
this has only been covered about a thousand times here.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard