BF2S Forums Haditha

Cougar wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

What the fuck? Why do I need to repeat myself so much here? Are you a god damn toddler? If you had read my posts, YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND THE SIGNIFICANCE THAT HIS QUESTIONS HOLD.

cougar wrote:

Yet again:

And once again Xietsu I call you out.  Tell us how you know so much about Iraq.  Tell us how you know so much about military maneuvers and procedures.  Tell us how you know so much about what happened at Haditha.  Tell us how you, someone who has shown no proof of having any knowledge or experience with any military, can sit back and tell 4 different people who have had military experience that they (in a nutshell) don't know what they are talking about.

you must think calling me a grunt is an insult.

No, it's a reference to importance/conceptual difficulty of your role. If you want to view it as an insult, you can, but it's up to you. .

Major_Spittle wrote:

Damn, I was too late to make the list also

Spittle, you haven't even communicated a position in this thread. Until you do (and until you make mention of my posts), I won't be making mention of your ability to read and comprehened (or lack therein).

I think everyone should just settle on the fact that Cougar never even tried to read my posts and is just ignoring them, because it's impossible for someone to be as stupid as someone would have to be to continue on in the way they have (were they to successfully accomplish the task that is comprehension of Xietsu's posts).

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7114 … 0524bm.jpg

LOL. I can't believe you dont even realize that these questions have already been answered. Cougar fails at life...@_@...

JUST FYI (so that you can sit and brood over my words until you have that magic moment called enlightenment), from here on out, I'll only reply if spittle or fleder or someone other than the aforementioned incapable four

Xietsu wrote:

Cougar wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

What the fuck? Why do I need to repeat myself so much here? Are you a god damn toddler? If you had read my posts, YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND THE SIGNIFICANCE THAT HIS QUESTIONS HOLD.

cougar wrote:

Yet again:

And once again Xietsu I call you out.  Tell us how you know so much about Iraq.  Tell us how you know so much about military maneuvers and procedures.  Tell us how you know so much about what happened at Haditha.  Tell us how you, someone who has shown no proof of having any knowledge or experience with any military, can sit back and tell 4 different people who have had military experience that they (in a nutshell) don't know what they are talking about.

you must think calling me a grunt is an insult.

No, it's a reference to importance/conceptual difficulty of your role. If you want to view it as an insult, you can, but it's up to you. .


Spittle, you haven't even communicated a position in this thread. Until you do (and until you make mention of my posts), I won't be making mention of your ability to read and comprehened (or lack therein).

I think everyone should just settle on the fact that Cougar never even tried to read my posts and is just ignoring them, because it's impossible for someone to be as stupid as someone would have to be to continue on in the way they have (were they to successfully accomplish the task that is comprehension of Xietsu's posts).

http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7114 … 0524bm.jpg

LOL. I can't believe you dont even realize that these questions have already been answered. Cougar fails at life...@_@...

JUST FYI (so that you can sit and brood over my words until you have that magic moment called enlightenment), from here on out, I'll only reply if spittle or fleder or someone other than the aforementioned incapable four

Show me.  Proof.  Quote.  Anything, just show me.

Dear ShitSu,

cnn, or i am willing to bet.... BBC is not the whole truth..... walk a 1m or 1km in a soldiers shoes.... then speak to me, until then ass hat... remain still, for it is not a childs place to speak when adults are chatting. k thanx bu buy..


~Recon

Even though Xietsu said mean bad things about me, he's doing an excellent job of making you guys look like idiots.

Ikarti wrote:

Even though Xietsu said mean bad things about me, he's doing an excellent job of making you guys look like idiots.

Not really.  I think you made yourself look like an ass in Recon's thread.  Good game.

only fitting with a name like ShitSu..

~Recon

Xietsu wrote:

Cougar wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

Even though Xietsu said mean bad things about me, he's doing an excellent job of making you guys look like idiots.

Not really.  I think you made yourself look like an ass in Recon's thread.  Good game.

LoL. This f*** is so stupid he didn't even realize I commented on Ikarti.

Are you done with the 8th grade insults yet?

Now, answer the questions.  I'm starting to beleive that you are afraid to answer them.  But wait....didn't you say they had already been answered?   In that case why not quote them for me since I is tooo stoopid to be gettin them on my lonesome.

Xietsu wrote:

Major_Spittle wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

LOL. I can't believe you dont even realize that these questions have already been answered. Cougar fails at life...@_@...

JUST FYI (so that you can sit and brood over my words until you have that magic moment called enlightenment), from here on out, I'll only reply if spittle or fleder or someone other than the aforementioned incapable four

Just answer the questions that were asked, how are you so knowledgable about Military tactics and these soldiers actions????

Spittle, you served, right? (Maybe it should be the quintuplet of the incapable?)

Yeah, I served.  Got the tee shirt.  But all a person needs to understand this subject is some common sense and no unsubstantiated preconceived notions about how the military works. 

Your trained to reacted to fire in a certain way, when your under fire you react how you training dictates you react.  You don't huddle up and say "Gee, we might get ourselves killed but what you say we go to that house for no reason and shoot up that family", which is what you obviously think people are able to do when a convoy is bombed, you have wounded people and are a sitting target.

bye the way, have you been called an Ass Hat lately???

Major_Spittle wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

Major_Spittle wrote:

Just answer the questions that were asked, how are you so knowledgable about Military tactics and these soldiers actions????

Spittle, you served, right? (Maybe it should be the quintuplet of the incapable?)

Yeah, I served.  Got the tee shirt.  But all a person needs to understand this subject is some common sense and no unsubstantiated preconceived notions about how the military works. 

Your trained to reacted to fire in a certain way, when your under fire you react how you training dictates you react.  You don't huddle up and say "Gee, we might get ourselves killed but what you say we go to that house for no reason and shoot up that family", which is what you obviously think people are able to do when a convoy is bombed, you have wounded people and are a sitting target.

bye the way, have you been called an Ass Hat lately???

Cite my "unsubstantiated, preconceived notion of how the military works". Have you even fucking read this thread?

This isn't a question of empirical knowledge (i.e. not a question of techniques used); this is a question of knowledge as applied to holdings in the logical, reasonable, and rational realm (a question of circumstantial response and reaction [and thus, the inability to judge the occurrence from such perspectives, as present, becomes evident {a view previously provided}])--hypothetical conceptualizing is pointless unless first-hand experience is held. The idea that second guesses shouldn't be made is entirely ignorant, and one of my first posts in this thread (pages one-ish, two-ish, or three-ish, not necessarily sure) poses the exact criterion for how such indecisiveness about the circumstance is suitable. But to say that it isn't (suitable) is to ignore the logical, rational, and reasonable, and to jump to conclusions of misplaced deference.

Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-12 22:59:34)

[pWa]Recon wrote:

Ikarti wrote:

Hey, you pro military guys burn crosses much?

no do you ass hat??? isn't it past your bed time kiddies..... go to sleep.... fuck... got suckle your mother's titty for some warm milk... shit i will warm up some milk for you if that will shut you up.... cougar.... can you believe that there are ppl this stewpid in the world.... i bet these are the guys that say:

"omginoyouhackandiamgonnagettheadmintobanyouomgroflcopterslolerskatesijustpwnedyounooob"

~Recon

sounds like someone's cranky. Go ahead and get Cougar to affirm you. Doesn't matter to me.

Xietsu wrote:

Major_Spittle wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

Spittle, you served, right? (Maybe it should be the quintuplet of the incapable?)

Yeah, I served.  Got the tee shirt.  But all a person needs to understand this subject is some common sense and no unsubstantiated preconceived notions about how the military works. 

Your trained to reacted to fire in a certain way, when your under fire you react how you training dictates you react.  You don't huddle up and say "Gee, we might get ourselves killed but what you say we go to that house for no reason and shoot up that family", which is what you obviously think people are able to do when a convoy is bombed, you have wounded people and are a sitting target.

bye the way, have you been called an Ass Hat lately???

Cite my "unsubstantiated, preconceived notion of how the military works". Have you even fucking read this thread?

Xietsu wrote:

I don't know the layout of the structure, but to miscalculate in your maneuvers to a scale in which you end up killing 20 civilians on accident--sounds like fucking carelessness to me. Apparently you didn't get the gist, your reading comprehension obviously fucking sucks.

ASS HAT

Major_Spittle wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

Major_Spittle wrote:

Yeah, I served.  Got the tee shirt.  But all a person needs to understand this subject is some common sense and no unsubstantiated preconceived notions about how the military works. 

Your trained to reacted to fire in a certain way, when your under fire you react how you training dictates you react.  You don't huddle up and say "Gee, we might get ourselves killed but what you say we go to that house for no reason and shoot up that family", which is what you obviously think people are able to do when a convoy is bombed, you have wounded people and are a sitting target.

bye the way, have you been called an Ass Hat lately???

Cite my "unsubstantiated, preconceived notion of how the military works". Have you even fucking read this thread?

Xietsu wrote:

I don't know the layout of the structure, but to miscalculate in your maneuvers to a scale in which you end up killing 20 civilians on accident--sounds like fucking carelessness to me. Apparently you didn't get the gist, your reading comprehension obviously fucking sucks.

ASS HAT