BF2S Forums A Year In America: 16,912 Murders; 92,837 Rapes

lowing wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

I would invest time into establishing such a rubric as have described, but there are so many Lowings and Cougars around, it would be in vain. Keep in mind that impartiality, openness, and nonseclusionist thinking is the basis in which such a system would be formulated. I've asked some women about such acceptance, and many agreed to it. Although, some of...these...as aforementioned...types of people could conjure some psycho-riot out of nothingness. To actually develop the "instruction", I'd have to do some research, conduct experiments, etc. Something that could take some minor portion of what we call "a career". Not something I really see as being worthy of my time, as adamant opposition is with great likelihood.

LMAO...........you don't get laid much do ya??

remo wrote:

lowing wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

I would invest time into establishing such a rubric as have described, but there are so many Lowings and Cougars around, it would be in vain. Keep in mind that impartiality, openness, and nonseclusionist thinking is the basis in which such a system would be formulated. I've asked some women about such acceptance, and many agreed to it. Although, some of...these...as aforementioned...types of people could conjure some psycho-riot out of nothingness. To actually develop the "instruction", I'd have to do some research, conduct experiments, etc. Something that could take some minor portion of what we call "a career". Not something I really see as being worthy of my time, as adamant opposition is with great likelihood.

LMAO...........you don't get laid much do ya??

Ah, the good ol' "he uses big words so he must be a dork and doesn't get laid" rebuke.  Classic.

Keep soiling the gene pool, pal.  We'll keep adding the chlorine.

Xietsu wrote:

LoL. As the fool would have it, great trust would be placed in his assumptions. You actually think that, because of an ability you are obviously lacking (articulation, objectivity, fusion of analyzation--all in all, intelligence), that some equalizing, guiding factor must be present? To profess you (and especially you) have some greater understanding of the imperceptible--that being the physical, visual apparency, in this case--and could make such a call without bringing to light your underpinnings in superficiality and an adolescent disregard for dignity? The fact of the matter is this: two procedures for discourse are taken. When speaking about a topic worthy of argument, serious discussion, etc, expansion is alotted to the degree necessary; when speaking socially with friends, making small talk, joking around, etc, simplicity is present.

remo wrote:

lowing wrote:

I don't mind "big words".but really.............who the fuck is he trying to impress??

What do you care?  It's the internet.  He's stroking his "e-go".  haha!  I made a funny.

lowing wrote:

And,  yes he is a dork, nice to see he has company.

Nothing wrong with being a dork ... in fact, I'm loving it (tm).  I'm an engineer, pulling down six-figures, and married to a doctor.

Oops, now I'm stroking my "e-go".

Last edited by lowing (2006-06-12 18:23:02)

Xietsu wrote:

lowing wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

LoL. As the fool would have it, great trust would be placed in his assumptions. You actually think that, because of an ability you are obviously lacking (articulation, objectivity, fusion of analyzation--all in all, intelligence), that some equalizing, guiding factor must be present? To profess you (and especially you) have some greater understanding of the imperceptible--that being the physical, visual apparency, in this case--and could make such a call without bringing to light your underpinnings in superficiality and an adolescent disregard for dignity? The fact of the matter is this: two procedures for discourse are taken. When speaking about a topic worthy of argument, serious discussion, etc, expansion is alotted to the degree necessary; when speaking socially with friends, making small talk, joking around, etc, simplicity is present.

Like I asked, who the fuck are you trying to impress?? If you think these forums are serious enough that you think you need to write like you are writing your PHD Theseus, then you are as pathetic as I have imagined. I don't read your BS with Awe. I read your BS and have a good laugh as you struggle to impress these readers.

By the way, although I am not the greatest of spellers, I do use spell checker. So if you really wanna look like you are smart, try being smart enough to use spell checker and spell your "big words" correctly.

Yeah, uh, I'd like to know where I've made such gaping mistakes. If you honestly believe I am attempting to impress someone, you have a deep lack of apt for comprehension. Again, testament to your pathetic nature--just because you think these "forums" aren't serious doesn't mean that the topics being discussed aren't worthy of a respectable attitude. Your (wow, lol, how often can you make such similar mistakes?) inability to understand my posts for what they are is just evidential to previous claims made against you. How the hell can you feel you are in a position to critique my posts (that of which is done erroneously) when you can't even spell thesis? How fucking old are you dude? Giving respects to your being American, I find it pretty fucking hilarious that after all these years (in which you presume you have actually amassed some form of wisdom), you still haven't been able to get a solid grasp over your native god damn language. Fucking sad. You are such a stupid bastard. . Hey, if you want small-talk, maybe you can get to know me; but until dicussion of topics that I feel hold merit for respect is being made, observation and perception of mine will be made in as thorough a manner as can be. In case you're too much of a (insert all previous assertions against Lowing here [those of which he has so clearly supported with his previous posts]), the idea, the concept behind my posts in this section are to erase misconception. Although...with you being what you are, that is quite the impossible task.

Last edited by lowing (2006-06-12 18:28:27)

Xietsu wrote:

Actually, I would disagree. Shakespearian writings are poetic, mine are academic in nature (despite their...minor use of pejoratives).

Alexanderthegrape wrote:

There are 161 languages spoken in the U.S. That makes it pretty damned diverse.