YESXietsu wrote:
Collateral damage.
. As it were, it should be Arabs striking out against the inability of the Middle East to tie down the reigns of extremist groups located in their region. But hey, you can only expect so much out of people so willing to blindly follow
Aww, look at the valiant display of RW&B.
happy death to zarqawi week
One...the MASSIVE BOMB as you call it is our smallest sized bomb in our arsenal. It was a 500 lb JDAM bomb. you cant get any smaller than that unless you use our BDU-33 practice bombs and well thats not gonna do anything but make a smoke trail from the house. It is unfortunate that the women and child died in the attack. However having this mad man taken out of action disrupts the attack and helps make the Iraqi citizens feel more secure about their future. This in turn will help to turn the country even more against the terrorists knowing that their leader is dead....and also that the information that lead to his death came from within his own orginization. Its a step towards peace in their area.|Vap0rXX| wrote:
Hey fella's, eventhough the Americans may have killed a terroriest i doubt you have seen the last of the attacks, although this may prove to the eventual disheartening of most terrorist i worry that it will only increase the attacks as they know have more "ammunition" so to speak, to justify to anyone who will listen that they are doing the right thing.
Lets put this in perspective however, this is a small victory and although it is a crucial one to the war effort this is only one man who seems to have spawned many terrorists unfortunatly.
And also for eveyone who is all whoo rahh about the massive bomb that obliterated a bunker, keep in m,ind that a women, and a child were murdered in this attack. They did nothing and will now be refered to as "collateral damage", clearly a massive understatement and a way to brush off a wayard death. Imagine some kid in America getting killed at night with her mother all to kill a terrorist, is it worth it?
Yep. Keep up the good work. If coalition uses same amount of resources and lives for every terrorist leader, insurgents will win this in a few years by driving enemies bankrupt. Just like usa did to ussr. To be serious, most specialists have said, that Al Zarqawi wasn't very important to insurgents, more like a justification to continue occupation. I'm sure that us army or government will soon announce a new main target to hunted, and used as an excuse to get rid of ageing bombs.lowing wrote:
Nope, but there would be 1 less of those sorry ass bastards, now wouldn't there??mooncricket wrote:
But, seriously, what would happen if we caught Bin Laden? Do y'all seriously think that all the terrorists would just come out and be like "Oh noes! you caught Bin Laden, I give up." I mean, it would be a big break and all, but I personally dont think much would change.
They don't work like that. Thye operate silently, under-the-radar types. They pay cash. They keep they're own accounts. They do everything to keep their stealth - and since its been 5 years and you haven't so much as found Bin Laden's hair, I think he's friggin good at it.PekkaA wrote:
Yep. Keep up the good work. If coalition uses same amount of resources and lives for every terrorist leader, insurgents will win this in a few years by driving enemies bankrupt. Just like usa did to ussr. To be serious, most specialists have said, that Al Zarqawi wasn't very important to insurgents, more like a justification to continue occupation. I'm sure that us army or government will soon announce a new main target to hunted, and used as an excuse to get rid of ageing bombs.lowing wrote:
Nope, but there would be 1 less of those sorry ass bastards, now wouldn't there??mooncricket wrote:
But, seriously, what would happen if we caught Bin Laden? Do y'all seriously think that all the terrorists would just come out and be like "Oh noes! you caught Bin Laden, I give up." I mean, it would be a big break and all, but I personally dont think much would change.
Killing bin Laden won't do much, unfourtunately. He DOES NOT co-ordinate. He merely gives 'moral' and financial support. Attacks - That is left to the individual cells. For more info, research netwars.
Last edited by Spark (2006-06-09 02:41:48)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
I bet you didn't notice the sarcasm in my postSpark wrote:
They don't work like that. Thye operate silently, under-the-radar types. They pay cash. They keep they're own accounts. They do everything to keep their stealth - and since its been 5 years and you haven't so much as found Bin Laden's hair, I think he's friggin good at it.PekkaA wrote:
Yep. Keep up the good work. If coalition uses same amount of resources and lives for every terrorist leader, insurgents will win this in a few years by driving enemies bankrupt. Just like usa did to ussr. To be serious, most specialists have said, that Al Zarqawi wasn't very important to insurgents, more like a justification to continue occupation. I'm sure that us army or government will soon announce a new main target to hunted, and used as an excuse to get rid of ageing bombs.lowing wrote:
Nope, but there would be 1 less of those sorry ass bastards, now wouldn't there??
Killing bin Laden won't do much, unfourtunately. He DOES NOT co-ordinate. He merely gives 'moral' and financial support. Attacks - That is left to the individual cells. For more info, research netwars.
Talking to lowing. Forgot to delete the quote - sorry.PekkaA wrote:
I bet you didn't notice the sarcasm in my postSpark wrote:
They don't work like that. Thye operate silently, under-the-radar types. They pay cash. They keep they're own accounts. They do everything to keep their stealth - and since its been 5 years and you haven't so much as found Bin Laden's hair, I think he's friggin good at it.PekkaA wrote:
Yep. Keep up the good work. If coalition uses same amount of resources and lives for every terrorist leader, insurgents will win this in a few years by driving enemies bankrupt. Just like usa did to ussr. To be serious, most specialists have said, that Al Zarqawi wasn't very important to insurgents, more like a justification to continue occupation. I'm sure that us army or government will soon announce a new main target to hunted, and used as an excuse to get rid of ageing bombs.
Killing bin Laden won't do much, unfourtunately. He DOES NOT co-ordinate. He merely gives 'moral' and financial support. Attacks - That is left to the individual cells. For more info, research netwars.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Oh ok you are being a smart ass to me....well let me respond like this.........the day before yesterday, you would have been able to add Al Zarqawi to that sentence about how the US "haven't so much as found Bin Laden hair"....A few years ago you could have even added Hussien........................Today, you can't. Get it??Spark wrote:
Talking to lowing. Forgot to delete the quote - sorry.PekkaA wrote:
I bet you didn't notice the sarcasm in my postSpark wrote:
They don't work like that. Thye operate silently, under-the-radar types. They pay cash. They keep they're own accounts. They do everything to keep their stealth - and since its been 5 years and you haven't so much as found Bin Laden's hair, I think he's friggin good at it.
Killing bin Laden won't do much, unfourtunately. He DOES NOT co-ordinate. He merely gives 'moral' and financial support. Attacks - That is left to the individual cells. For more info, research netwars.
Enjoy the festivities.
With all our highly trained crack troops and special forces surly a ground assault would have been better and we could have got him alive and put his ass on trial. He got what he wanted anyway..martyrdom. I don't like the fact that the general strategy is to bomb everything to rubble from the air, killing women and children.
Here's the difference, Sadam and Zarqawi were wanted men for a short amount of time relatively speaking (both since the war the war in Iraq started) whereas Bin Laden has been on the run since 2001!!!!!!! That's 5 years and you still haven't found an Arab that sticks out like a soar thumb; he has to be the tallest guy in the middle east and needs constant medical care and yet he has still evaded capture!lowing wrote:
Oh ok you are being a smart ass to me....well let me respond like this.........the day before yesterday, you would have been able to add Al Zarqawi to that sentence about how the US "haven't so much as found Bin Laden hair"....A few years ago you could have even added Hussien........................Today, you can't. Get it??
Enjoy the festivities.
And as far as your concerned, what is the difference of we catch him or not, you will just dismiss it like you do Al Zarqawi anyway.=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:
Here's the difference, Sadam and Zarqawi were wanted men for a short amount of time relatively speaking (both since the war the war in Iraq started) whereas Bin Laden has been on the run since 2001!!!!!!! That's 5 years and you still haven't found an Arab that sticks out like a soar thumb; he has to be the tallest guy in the middle east and needs constant medical care and yet he has still evaded capture!lowing wrote:
Oh ok you are being a smart ass to me....well let me respond like this.........the day before yesterday, you would have been able to add Al Zarqawi to that sentence about how the US "haven't so much as found Bin Laden hair"....A few years ago you could have even added Hussien........................Today, you can't. Get it??
Enjoy the festivities.
In other words if it were Bin laden killed the other day, you would be on here saying, ...........SO you got Bin Laden but ya can't even get Al Zarqawi when he is in the same city as you.
With people like you, it is always going to be a damned if you do, damned if you don't scenerio.
Last edited by lowing (2006-06-09 04:03:46)
well how can u capture osama bin laden if he doesnt use any electricity and uses a cave as a home... think how large is the afgani desert. nuking that entire area will be the fastest way to make sure osama is dead, but then its immoral...=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:
Here's the difference, Sadam and Zarqawi were wanted men for a short amount of time relatively speaking (both since the war the war in Iraq started) whereas Bin Laden has been on the run since 2001!!!!!!! That's 5 years and you still haven't found an Arab that sticks out like a soar thumb; he has to be the tallest guy in the middle east and needs constant medical care and yet he has still evaded capture!lowing wrote:
Oh ok you are being a smart ass to me....well let me respond like this.........the day before yesterday, you would have been able to add Al Zarqawi to that sentence about how the US "haven't so much as found Bin Laden hair"....A few years ago you could have even added Hussien........................Today, you can't. Get it??
Enjoy the festivities.
EVERYONE who thinks this is an AMERICAN victory is a liberal comunist asshole. Ok all joking aside he was THE man in Iraq. He beheaded more than one person. Much less than One AMERICAN. He is responsible for the killings of many Iraqis. Just because they didnt follow his sect of relegion. And the next asshole that says that this is bush's war. go shave yourself. Trade in your petrol powered transportation, and fuckin walk.
I really hate reading this shit. You really think I give a fucking dam about some TERRORIST SYMPATHISER. What about the 3500 civilians who did nothing but go to work one morning and got killed. What the fuck? If they r killed because of what they beleive then they are MYRTERS, If we dont know what they believe then they are collateral dammage. Believe what you want, but EVERY DEAD EXTREMIST IS A GOOD ONE. Also the only reason NATO wants to disarm AMERICA is because our military doesn't scare them. WE F'N DO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by redhawk454 (2006-06-09 04:32:56)
Well said Redhawk.
actually we are not celebrating his death, just the fact that he wont be pulling anymore SHIT. Oh and by the way, america may have launched the bombs, but the Iraqis found him. My friend was worse off after an explosion and he lived. But Al dickhead was erased by the Iraqis.xXSarnathXx wrote:
still tho, a shame people are actually celebrating another humans death
Wouldn't a pm be suitable channel for questions like that?redhawk454 wrote:
where can i get a copy of that awesome music vid to show my friendsd3v1ldr1v3r13 wrote:
Well said Redhawk.
yeah, enough cursing and exclamation points to your taste?d3v1ldr1v3r13 wrote:
Well said Redhawk.
This should be a national Holiday Death of Al-Zarqawi Day. Mr. President.....get on this. Maybe the guy that dropped the bombs on the house, should have his own holiday. Or the person who obtained the information of him being there should have a holiday........screw it, HOLIDAYS FOR EVERYONE!!!!!11!!1!!1!
Im quite spent right now, FUCK.
Looks like someone knew they got their ass handed to them. sure having trouble thinking of a good comeback kiddo.PekkaA wrote:
yeah, enough cursing and exclamation points to your taste?
Funny I dont recall the music vid thing being said anywhere.PekkaA wrote:
Wouldn't a pm be suitable channel for questions like that?redhawk454 wrote:
where can i get a copy of that awesome music vid to show my friendsd3v1ldr1v3r13 wrote:
Well said Redhawk.
Many terrorists wish to kick "infidels" out of their sacred lands, no more. Kind of like wanting to, say, kick the British out of your colony, no?d3v1ldr1v3r13 wrote:
Dont need to, the terrorist group he was involved with is no different than the Al-Queda of yesterday, kill the infidels who do no worship Allah...