intel IV with ATI
Poll
What hardware is yours?
| AMD CPU + Nvidia GPU | 46% | 46% - 73 | ||||
| INTEL CPU + Nvidia GPU | 22% | 22% - 36 | ||||
| AMD Cpu + Ati Gpu | 16% | 16% - 26 | ||||
| INTEL Cpu + Ati Gpu | 14% | 14% - 23 | ||||
| Total: 158 | ||||||
i sure know i will, seems like a budget chip with super power, well i will be ordering mine as soon as it becomes avalible and overclock it to maybe 3.6GHz with my vapochill kit, now that would be a fast chip.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
2.13 is 230usdJaM3z wrote:
same mate whats the price on those when they come out?cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
intel w/ nvidia gpu...
im waiting for conroe
2.4 is 316 usd
2.66 is 550usd
and all those run as fast as FX60, most ppl will go w/ 2.4 and overclock it to around 3ghz
how comes there going to be so cheap for the amount of power that they have is what i want know, what is intel doing that AMD are not?
Any release date for UK yet, and yes i did google and found nothing specific
there is a benchmark on a conroe at 2.66GHz vs a overclocked FX-60 at 2.80GHz and the FX-60 got creamed in every test.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
Are there even any benchmarks for Conroe cores vs their AMD equivs? Comparing it to current AMD chips is quite pointless.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
But this summer... intel has better cpu's than amd's...Kontrolfreq wrote:
AMD64 X2 4400+ and an NVidia 7800GTX go.
I don't think i'd ever put an Intel chip in a machine of mine again. Cheaper, often give better performance and they prove that its not all about clock speeds! I can't say i've ever owned an ATI card but i do tend to stick to the same brand so i'll prolly stay Nvidia.
Conroe (or core 2 duo, gay name i know) is cheaper, more efficient in instruction per clock, and higher overclockability (2.4 to 3.6ghz on AIR). but now amd pwns
2 rigs , AMD +nvidia
Intel+ati
Intel+ati
true... but how much will a conroe cost?JaM3z wrote:
there is a benchmark on a conroe at 2.66GHz vs a overclocked FX-60 at 2.80GHz and the FX-60 got creamed in every test.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
Are there even any benchmarks for Conroe cores vs their AMD equivs? Comparing it to current AMD chips is quite pointless.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
But this summer... intel has better cpu's than amd's...
Conroe (or core 2 duo, gay name i know) is cheaper, more efficient in instruction per clock, and higher overclockability (2.4 to 3.6ghz on AIR). but now amd pwns
If Conroe comes about and everything else starts to drop, I'd just go ahead and get something cheaper.
Yes, that is exactly what he is saying! Thats like comparing a 7800 to a 9800. Different generations of CPUs are not going to compete. Not saying I doubt the Conroe's performance, but still.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
there is a benchmark on a conroe at 2.66GHz vs a overclocked FX-60 at 2.80GHz and the FX-60 got creamed in every test.JaM3z wrote:
Are there even any benchmarks for Conroe cores vs their AMD equivs? Comparing it to current AMD chips is quite pointless.
As for me,
Intel (Pentium M) that is super cool, and OCs great.
Along with my x800.
Last edited by Snipedya14 (2006-06-01 08:21:28)
Amd + Ati
go read the top...T0tal-Annihilation wrote:
true... but how much will a conroe cost?JaM3z wrote:
there is a benchmark on a conroe at 2.66GHz vs a overclocked FX-60 at 2.80GHz and the FX-60 got creamed in every test.TheEternalPessimist wrote:
Are there even any benchmarks for Conroe cores vs their AMD equivs? Comparing it to current AMD chips is quite pointless.
If Conroe comes about and everything else starts to drop, I'd just go ahead and get something cheaper.
for more info
fsb is at 266mhz (not pumped yet) 1066 when pumped (or total)
2.66ghz is at 10X multiplier
2.4 is at 9X multiplier
2.13 is at 8X...
btw, 2.13ghz conroe can cream 2.6ghz fx60...
you can compare it now since its intels latest against AMD's latest, but i dont see any success in AMD's K8L unless its gonna be around same price as conroe for same/ better performance.
Last edited by cyborg_ninja-117 (2006-06-01 08:30:26)
Intel 2,8Ghz + Nivdia 7900 GTX
Yes you can compare but, am i right in saying the conroe is made using 65nm fabrication process where as AMD are only just switching to 65nm..even there lastest AM2 chips are still using the older 90nm technology..so the gap has closed for the time being... "Production is still based on the 90 nm process but is now on 300 mm wafers. Plans are afoot to introduce 65 nm by the end of the year." ..give it a few month and AMD will be ahead again methinks!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
btw, 2.13ghz conroe can cream 2.6ghz fx60...
you can compare it now since its intels latest against AMD's latest, but i dont see any success in AMD's K8L unless its gonna be around same price as conroe for same/ better performance.
but i dont think it makes much difference, lets see between 840d and 940d, i dont see much performance gain except for lower temps (higher oc). but yeah i kinda agree w/ u. but its still shocking for the price/performance ratio. intels saying "yo amd, our 200 dollar chip kicked ur 1000 dollar cpu in the ass!"Snipe=UKLF= wrote:
Yes you can compare but, am i right in saying the conroe is made using 65nm fabrication process where as AMD are only just switching to 65nm..even there lastest AM2 chips are still using the older 90nm technology..so the gap has closed for the time being... "Production is still based on the 90 nm process but is now on 300 mm wafers. Plans are afoot to introduce 65 nm by the end of the year." ..give it a few month and AMD will be ahead again methinks!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
btw, 2.13ghz conroe can cream 2.6ghz fx60...
you can compare it now since its intels latest against AMD's latest, but i dont see any success in AMD's K8L unless its gonna be around same price as conroe for same/ better performance.
Yea, AMD chips will probably die in terms of monetary costs... which means... it's time for me to buy some
3700+ and 7800gtx
Skt 939 Athlon 64 3500+ (@2.7Ghz on Air)
2 x 6600GT Extreme's SLI'd
2 x 6600GT Extreme's SLI'd
opty 170 & 1900xt
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
2 rigs:
Mine
3.4Ghz Intel with 9600XT, 1 Gb RAM
Wife's
2.2Ghz AMD with Ge4 440mx, 1 GB RAM
She only plays Sims 2, so that's OK!
I've just ordered a new mobo, 2 sticks of 1Gb RAM and a 7600GT for the Intel today, so by the weekend I'll be back in the game again. Trouble is, my legit copy of XP will complain about all the new kit and probably won't activate...unless you guys know otherwise?
Mine
3.4Ghz Intel with 9600XT, 1 Gb RAM
Wife's
2.2Ghz AMD with Ge4 440mx, 1 GB RAM
She only plays Sims 2, so that's OK!
I've just ordered a new mobo, 2 sticks of 1Gb RAM and a 7600GT for the Intel today, so by the weekend I'll be back in the game again. Trouble is, my legit copy of XP will complain about all the new kit and probably won't activate...unless you guys know otherwise?
AMD1900+ /w FX5900 (girlfriend's rig)
AMD2800+ /w 6800GS (my rig)
AMD3800+ /w FX5700 (family rig)
AMD1900+ /w FX5200 (sister's rig)
AMD2800+ /w Nvidia Go320(Laptop.. I beleive it's the 320)
So... ya.... That was an easy poll to answer
AMD2800+ /w 6800GS (my rig)
AMD3800+ /w FX5700 (family rig)
AMD1900+ /w FX5200 (sister's rig)
AMD2800+ /w Nvidia Go320(Laptop.. I beleive it's the 320)
So... ya.... That was an easy poll to answer
Intel/Nvidia
3.4 Ghz P4 HT and a 256mb GeForce 6800 Ultra
All settings on high and Bf2 looks beautiful
3.4 Ghz P4 HT and a 256mb GeForce 6800 Ultra
All settings on high and Bf2 looks beautiful
P4 3Ghz
6800 GT OC
I prefer nVidia video cards (I've had mostly nVidia, but also a 9800 Pro) and I've always run Intel, but I wouldn't mind running AMD.
6800 GT OC
I prefer nVidia video cards (I've had mostly nVidia, but also a 9800 Pro) and I've always run Intel, but I wouldn't mind running AMD.
AMD y Nvidia, I will never use intel again...EVER, because AMD PWNS them.
AMD/nVidia.
Always have, probably always will.
Always have, probably always will.
A64 3700+ & 7900 GT (Point of View)
AMD because Intel is much to expensive.
nVidia because of the SLI-Option (A8N SLI Premium) which is simple and more flexible than Crossfire.
AMD because Intel is much to expensive.
nVidia because of the SLI-Option (A8N SLI Premium) which is simple and more flexible than Crossfire.
AMD + Nvidia.
Until about half a month ago it was AMD + ATI
Until about half a month ago it was AMD + ATI
My Rig's run by an Intel P4 HT 3.4 GHz, a Nvidia GeForce 7800 GTX (256 MB) and 2 GByte RAM.
This Baby runs sweet to my Satisfaction
This Baby runs sweet to my Satisfaction
Alienware
Intel + Nvidia
Intel + Nvidia