erm, AI is having a much bigger disruption on the teaching profession and education than it is on publishing. people want their books to be edited by a human they can email and call. neither students nor their parents evidently give much of a shit about teachers. isn't that why you're climbing the greasy pole into the administrative state, so you can milk your unionised benefits and inoculate yourself against the AI shitstorm? buy another gaudy watch so you temporarily won't have to worry about it.
i have no stake in this other than thinking it is ugly and banal. sure, there's a day or two of 'meme appeal' when everyone is making funny in-jokes using the new toy. it's amusing. but in the long-term you're just robbing yourself of another nice thing for almost zero meaningful gain.
hope you're okay with there not being any new styles or forms of expression, down the line. because the sort of animation studio that ghibli represents, in its work ethic and overall ethos, is not going to be financially viable in a future where people can create entire animated movies using a text prompt. i don't give a shit about animated movies, so i don't know why you think i'm personally invested in this; i'm just pointing to the obvious consequences of all this glowing enthusiasm.
the 'problem' with generative AI slop is it abolishes the distance between 'good' and 'bad', or more precisely 'great art' and 'good enough content'. sure, most people never gave a shit about such distinctions in any case. they want their ghibli portraits and they want their custom-designed key rings and custom-printed stanley cups to show off at the office. but nobody is asking
why exactly they would want an instantly generated oil painting 'in the style of ...' da vinci or rubens or whatever. there's all this amazement at the capacity to do it without any of the qualitative assessment of the actual fucking point of it all. just more slop for the digital landfill.
Last edited by uziq (2025-03-29 05:35:09)