the question remains who can depose putin in the one-party state he has built. the media, police, rural peasant opinion, etc, backs him.
part of the reason he wanted to invade ukraine was because of the presence of a liberal, cosmopolitan, western-friendly, internationalist, etc, neighbour on his doorstep. he's worked hard to extinguish international, outward-looking liberalism at home, by persecuting journalists, opposition figures, prominent international business people, etc.
it was pretty brave to see russians on the streets of st. petersburg, considering the risk to their liberty and fierce clampdowns, but urbanite opinion in moscow/st. petersburg is perhaps as relevant to putin as bostonian's opinions were to donald trump. from our own ignominious recent history, the protests against blair's wars in the middle-east were the largest protests in british history, ever ... and they achieved precisely diddly squat. in a democratic society.
the whole line that ukraine is 'nazi' is so funny and bogus. of the represented far-right groups in ukraine, i think only one right-affiliated party has a single seat in their parliament. they have a lower representation in elective ukrainian politics than the far-right does in russia. plenty of photos circulating online of 'ultras' and nazi russian troopers, too, bearing all the usual tattoos.
Last edited by uziq (2022-02-25 08:21:47)