unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Disengagement was one of my yuge complaints about the Trump presidency. It was mind-boggling to me how Trump fans could at once be wary of China, yet so *#&@ unfazed about giving them voids to fill. Very problematic thought process. No openings for argument either, it's all closed opinion and deflection.
I would term it more 'sabotage' than simply disengagement. The Trump administration was an unmitigated disaster in this respect to a point that the US will probably never recover from its legacy. In this I see Trump as the final culmination in a longer neoconservative tradition of the US sabotaging its own position, the nail in the coffin if you will.
From personal experience it was nearly pointless dealing with the US during his administration and an absolute ton of career civil servants resigned their posts. I believe there's still an enormous amount of vacancies for ambassadors and international representatives that just haven't been filled. Tried to withdraw from the WHO, withdrew from the climate accords, withdrew from various influential UN commissions, threatened to pull support from NATO, completely erratic foreign policy - with any international event you'd hear Mattis say X, Tillerson say Y, Trump blast Z on twitter. No regard or respect whatsoever for international norms or agreements that were made... the whole notion of the US as a dependable or even just rational/predictable world power was thrown out the window.
A change in administrations doesn't/can't heal all that damage. And even if there's sustained stability over the next few administrations, some of the damage is permanent through the loss of influence to other parties that indeed 'filled the gap'. i.e. allegiances to China esp. have grown. China now also receives more foreign heads of state each year than the US ever did. It's gg, and noticeable in UN voting.