Dilbert_X wrote:
Except it wasn't everywhere, it took a while to get there and many places squashed it when it did.
It was only further travel which spread it again.
If we'd known what was happening in Oct-Dec 2019 this would have been squashed.
wrong. retroactive sampling and testing has showed signs of covid in europe, at the time unsuspected and undiagnosed, as early as october 2019, with mid-december being highly likely.
i ask you, again, to bear in mind the practicalities of noticing, testing for, and diagnosing new respiratory-type illnesses during peak winter season, i.e. 'cold and flu' season. there are already 4 main flu types and at least 4 main coronaviruses in common circulation at this time. people reporting to hospitals or the elderly developing pneumonia as sequelae from these illnesses would not immediately draw much attention. intensive sampling and genomic sequencing wasn't being performed on the first patients to report to hospital with covid-19 in europe in october/december.
europe's first confirmed covid case was the
end of january 2021. italy didn't confirm its first cases of their first-wave epidemic, in rome, until
january 31st 2021. don't you think that's just a little, erm, late? for a virus that was apparently first detected in wuhan, at a global hub of trade and logistics,
even if we take the official chinese date of early december 2020?
"it took a while to get there" you say? why? elsewhere you say, quite rightly, "you can order anything from anywhere in the world now and have it almost within 24 hours". but, according to the officially reported cases, it took covid from december 7th to january 31st to arrive in europe? did it take a camel train through the silk road or what? was patient one in italy Marco Polo?
many studies have raised the quite likely possibility that covid was in europe probably within those first few 'asymptomatic', unnoticed weeks of its emergence in wuhan. it is quite likely that infected person(s) or carriers took it to europe before the emergence was even noticed in china. the virus's mechanics make it practically into a silent viral charge with a 2-week timer.
e.g.
A 43-year-old man from Bobigny received treatment at a hospital near Paris on December 27, 2020, with complaints of a dry cough, difficulty breathing, and a fever.
He was suspected of having pneumonia, but his doctor Yves Cohen retested the swab in May 2020. It came back SARS-CoV-2-positive. The man had reportedly not traveled abroad.
or e.g.
Environmental monitoring in three Italian cities revealed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in sewage samples taken between October 2019 and February 2020.
The studyTrusted Source, which was conducted by Rome’s Department of Environment and Health, found that of the 15 positive samples detected, eight dated back to before February 2020. The earliest was found on December 18, 2019, in Milan and Turin, suggesting that the virus was already circulating in mid-December 2019.
https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens … at.1009620once again, what you consistently do here is extrapolate australia's or NZ's experience, and in particular the experience of your state of 1.6 million people, to the world. many places are much more connected to international trade/movement of labour than australia/NZ, dilbert. it really didn't necessarily 'take a while' to get anywhere after its first emergence. lots of business is conducted in wuhan; a lot of goods are distributed from wuhan. the experience of low-population island nations is surely not the model in this pandemic.
Dilbert wrote:
The fact is we're not doing enough now to give the vaccines a chance, they're always going to be running behind new variants every one of which will go global before we even know its happening.
'the fact is', every single clinical trial done so far shows that the vaccines, the mRNA vaccines especially, are still
highly effective against the newer mutations of covid. as in, an order of magnitude more effective than any flu jab we have ever had available at our disposal. why do you consistently try to misrepresent this picture?
if you have been recently boostered, you are 99.8% safe against any risk of severe disease.
'the fact is', we also have now several different antiviral pills available which are similarly effective against covid. many nations are already placing orders for tens of millions of them. this is early-stage tech and will only get better. it works.
we are not 'lagging behind variants and losing badly'. the
death rate and hospitalization rate has been more or less flat since widespread vaccination was adopted in the uK, for instance. how are you going to say this is a unique catastrophe? jesus fucking christ, once again, with your vaccine skepticism and hysteria.
Last edited by uziq (2022-01-01 04:46:27)