it's a little too early to be triumphant, here. I did say early study results are promising but the omicron wave in Europe has barely begun. It's been a week, and infection numbers are going up like a rocketship so far.
serious illnesses normally occur 10-15 days after onset. we are way past 15 days of omicron arriving in europe. the mass death hasn't started to happen.
tissue sample studies have identifed that omicron is far more prevalent outside the deep lung tissue than inside it. that gives a clue to the different etiology and symptoms of the disease. we are not dealing with a strain, like delta, that can quickly lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia-like complications, even in the young and vaccinated. we are dealing with a mild illness of the throat and upper bronchi.
cases are at their highest ever level in europe and yet serious illness and mass death isn't happening. how much longer do you want to wait before concluding that omicron is nowhere near as bad as delta?
tissue sample studies have identifed that omicron is far more prevalent outside the deep lung tissue than inside it. that gives a clue to the different etiology and symptoms of the disease. we are not dealing with a strain, like delta, that can quickly lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia-like complications, even in the young and vaccinated. we are dealing with a mild illness of the throat and upper bronchi.
cases are at their highest ever level in europe and yet serious illness and mass death isn't happening. how much longer do you want to wait before concluding that omicron is nowhere near as bad as delta?
Bout a month. Onset of serious illness was somewhere around the 20 day mark I believe. Some more time will also allow for a more even spread throughout the population. Big question is if elderly and vulnerable too experience a much milder time with omnicron.
We should just give up.
omicron emerged in south africa and became a variant of concern for the WHO by november 28 – a month ago.Larssen wrote:
Bout a month. Onset of serious illness was somewhere around the 20 day mark I believe. Some more time will also allow for a more even spread throughout the population. Big question is if elderly and vulnerable too experience a much milder time with omnicron.
deaths in SA remained flat and a fraction of the delta wave.
wouldn't expect to see a very different picture in western europe.
give up on the illusion of tightly controlling this thing's progress, yes. the best we can hope is that, through widespread vaccination and passive (i.e. post-infection) immunity, it will fade away to become an endemic disease with periodic/cyclic outbreaks in the population.We should just give up.
the economist wrote a lead feature this week about giving up on travel controls and huge curtailments of civil society. they no longer work or are justifiable against delta+omicron. the 'emergency measures'-type justification for such controls is no longer creating any appreciable result.
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2022/ … nl_today_1
Rapidly imposed travel restrictions make sense in the early stages of an outbreak, when infections of a variant are few and test-and-trace systems are still able to follow the paths of contagion. When imported cases account for more than 10% of infections, bans can have a big impact on the growth of the epidemic. They can thus buy time to find out about a new variant, prepare hospitals or roll out vaccinations.
But travel bans have a habit of sticking around even though, once a virus or variant is circulating freely in a country, they are largely pointless. By the time France banned non-essential travel from Britain on December 16th, hoping to keep out Omicron, it was already recording a daily average of over 50,000 infections, 10% higher than its peak during the Delta wave earlier in the year. Any imported infections would, by that point, have made little difference to the burden of disease—certainly not enough to justify the economic and social disruption caused by the travel ban.
One reason travel restrictions tend not to have lasting benefits is that most of them are leaky. With very few exceptions, countries let citizens, residents, their families, essential workers, diplomats, important businesspeople or some combination of those cross borders. The countries that impose successful long-term travel bans, as Australia and New Zealand did, must do so at enormous cost not just to their global links but also to their own citizens. For much of 2021 Australians struggled to get back into their own country and had to pay exorbitant amounts for flights and quarantine-hotels to do so. To keep covid-19 out, such measures must be reinforced by draconian curbs at home, too. Australians have not been allowed to cross state borders for most of the past two years; the city of Melbourne was locked down for 262 days in 2021.
Such policies can save lives, and they are less leaky on islands. But few democracies are willing to tolerate them for very long. Indeed, the only country still pursuing a strict zero-covid policy is China, which is taking increasingly desperate measures to contain recent outbreaks of the virus. In Xi’an, a city of about 13m where daily infections have risen from zero to over 100 in December, authorities have imposed a ferocious lockdown, are repeatedly mass-testing the population and have shoved some 30,000 people into hotel quarantine. Such methods are popular in China, where people credit their stern rulers for keeping them safe. But it is far from clear whether China’s zero-covid policy is sustainable, given the high transmissibility of Omicron, nor how China will eventually move beyond it to live with the disease.
For the rest of the world, the best approach is for governments to promote the most cost-effective policies, especially vaccines and boosters, while resisting the urge to ban things just to create the illusion of decisiveness. Britain and America have displayed admirable common sense of late. Both countries removed travel restrictions on southern African countries once it was clear that the variant was circulating at home. America shortened the window during which a negative covid test must be obtained before travelling. Britain asked incoming travellers to take a test within two days of arrival and to self-isolate until they receive a negative result. Even then, such measures should aim to be proportionate and minimally disruptive. ■
Last edited by uziq (2021-12-29 14:37:24)
I meant we should all put on some Adidas sneakers, eat some apple sauce laced with drugs, and wait for the spaceship behind Halley's comet to take us to space. COVID can have the earth. It earned it.
I understand epidemiology just fine, you struggle with the english language.uziq wrote:
lol you don’t understand epidemiology. amazing.
Once James Franco gets his PhD maybe he'll run some classes, you should look into that.
Fuck Israel
the cost of vaccinating the world in the context i linked clearly meant 'those in the world who are unvaccinated'. that's clearly the fucking context of such discussions/arguments. the point of the article wasn't 'what would it cost to give 3x doses to 7.8 billion people'. jesus fucking christ. great job on demonstrating your third-grade arithmetic, though. have a biscuit.
whether you want to phrase it or formulate the problem as 'the cost of vaccinating the global south' or 'the cost of not vaccinating the global south', the figures are pretty clear. the cost of doing nothing is an order of magnitude more expensive than the short-term costs of vaccination efforts.
of course, the bigger, hidden cost is the loss of potential profit to the pharmaceutical companies who would have to renege control over their intellectual property rights. that's the real salient figure in this discussion, the elephant in the room, so to speak.
you are insufferably condescending on this topic and yet have proferred nothing – literally zilch – in the way of practicable solutions. you're still trying to reassert control over a pandemic using stringent measures when that horse bolted from the stable in mid-august/september. wow.
whether you want to phrase it or formulate the problem as 'the cost of vaccinating the global south' or 'the cost of not vaccinating the global south', the figures are pretty clear. the cost of doing nothing is an order of magnitude more expensive than the short-term costs of vaccination efforts.
of course, the bigger, hidden cost is the loss of potential profit to the pharmaceutical companies who would have to renege control over their intellectual property rights. that's the real salient figure in this discussion, the elephant in the room, so to speak.
you are insufferably condescending on this topic and yet have proferred nothing – literally zilch – in the way of practicable solutions. you're still trying to reassert control over a pandemic using stringent measures when that horse bolted from the stable in mid-august/september. wow.
It should be China putting up the money to vaccinate the third world. The global suffering caused by that nation and the continued hubris of its leadership and people makes me feel like the Germans must have felt about the Jews in 193X.
In any case, I am strongly against letting developing nations manufacture western COVID vaccines. The last thing we need is faulty Ugandan vaccines scaring people. There are plenty of people with a background in medicine and vaccine manufacturing who feel the same way.
In any case, I am strongly against letting developing nations manufacture western COVID vaccines. The last thing we need is faulty Ugandan vaccines scaring people. There are plenty of people with a background in medicine and vaccine manufacturing who feel the same way.
actually there are plenty of people in virology who think that 'developing nations' could manufacture vaccines easily. the process of manufacturing a vaccine is not quite like making semiconductors. the AZ/J&J-type tech is actually rather rudimentary. these countries already produce their own vaccines for any number of comparable illnesses. they could easily re-tool and produce covid vaccines.
in the UK we had companies set-up in a trice being handed massive contracts to source, supply or manufacture medical equipment. people with zero experience. brand new businesses filed in a hurry to cash-in. give me a fucking break that the developing world is uniquely incapable of doing anything properly.
in the UK we had companies set-up in a trice being handed massive contracts to source, supply or manufacture medical equipment. people with zero experience. brand new businesses filed in a hurry to cash-in. give me a fucking break that the developing world is uniquely incapable of doing anything properly.
Yes, the definition of vaccination is vaccinating people who are unvaccinated. Amazing, thank you for that.
You phrased it as 'Price tag to vaccinate the world', I think you need to work on communication
I've 'profferred' plenty of effective solutions which have been show to work great, unfortunately various govts decided to either leave the stable door open or actively open it and spank the horses until they bolted.
If they'd been sensible this thing would have been contained and killed, like SARS-1.
Unfortunately ignorant opinionated prats like you and Cummings were calling the shots and here we are.
You phrased it as 'Price tag to vaccinate the world', I think you need to work on communication
I've 'profferred' plenty of effective solutions which have been show to work great, unfortunately various govts decided to either leave the stable door open or actively open it and spank the horses until they bolted.
If they'd been sensible this thing would have been contained and killed, like SARS-1.
Unfortunately ignorant opinionated prats like you and Cummings were calling the shots and here we are.
Fuck Israel
Manufacture isn't the problem, its delivery.uziq wrote:
actually there are plenty of people in virology who think that 'developing nations' could manufacture vaccines easily. the process of manufacturing a vaccine is not quite like making semiconductors. the AZ/J&J-type tech is actually rather rudimentary. these countries already produce their own vaccines for any number of comparable illnesses. they could easily re-tool and produce covid vaccines.
Much easier to build a parallel line in a factory in a first world country with a growth culture on tap than in a third world country.
Then there's the management culture, I wouldn't take a medicine manufactured in India.
Fuck Israel
We can both cherry pick experts.
The issue with vaccination in developed countries is that we have reached a point where we cannot convince a sizable enough group to take the vaccine. There is also a sizable enough group of otherwise nice people who were skeptical of the vaccine but took it anyway. We don't need stories about bad COVID vaccines in developing countries spooking otherwise okay people in our part of the world.
I agree with you on reopening and returning to normalcy but risking our own domestic messaging on vaccines in order to help the developing world...nah. I rather just send them vaccines produced here or elsewhere.
Maybe there are no perfect solutions or perfect answers. Sometimes life is just like that.
The issue with vaccination in developed countries is that we have reached a point where we cannot convince a sizable enough group to take the vaccine. There is also a sizable enough group of otherwise nice people who were skeptical of the vaccine but took it anyway. We don't need stories about bad COVID vaccines in developing countries spooking otherwise okay people in our part of the world.
I agree with you on reopening and returning to normalcy but risking our own domestic messaging on vaccines in order to help the developing world...nah. I rather just send them vaccines produced here or elsewhere.
Probably shouldn't use that as an argument. You are going to talk people into adopting Dilbert's positions.Uzique wrote:
But variants are going to keep coming from the unvaxed developing world.
Maybe there are no perfect solutions or perfect answers. Sometimes life is just like that.
Thats the next step "Ah you know we can give you a much cheaper vaccine made in Bangalore and tested and certified in Bangalore, it'll save the health service $10 per dose so thats what you're getting"
Fuck off no thanks.
Fuck off no thanks.
Fuck Israel
Only half a million new cases. I am sure this will blow over.With a caseload nearly twice that of the worst single days of last winter, the United States shattered its record for new daily coronavirus cases, a milestone that may still fall short of describing the true destruction caused by the Delta and Omicron variants because testing has slowed over the holidays.
As a second year of living with the pandemic was drawing to a close, the new daily case total topped 488,000 on Wednesday, according to a New York Times database. (The total was higher on Monday, but that number should not be considered a record because it included data from the long holiday weekend.)
Only 18 deaths, as long as its not you nothing to worry about.uziq wrote:
unfortunately for america delta is still really prevalent. you guys sure did fuck up by keeping 40% unvaccinated and susceptible to a seriously nasty disease.
omicron now accounts for 90% of all new cases in the UK. it is considerably milder than delta.
remember when i said a few weeks ago that it's conceivable that omicron could quickly outcompete delta and lead to an (admittedly large tidal wave) of mild infections? and dilbert called me an insane person for even possibly mentioning the incidental benefits of this? *whistles*
the UK has been at 100k new cases a day for over a week, and omicron has been on the scene for almost a month now. want to know how many deaths we had yesterday? 18. hospitalisations are up but ICU demand is not; neither are deaths; average length of hospital stays is drastically down on this time last year. looks like the omicron wave is precisely a wave of mild illness that shouldn't perturb any vaccinated population.
wowsers!
Fuck Israel
Sitting in bed reading my zombie apocalypse book and it really hit me that schools are going to be closed for awhile again.
er most of the world have been taking vaccines manufactured in india. that’s where the vast majority of the AZ vaccines have been manufactured.Dilbert_X wrote:
Manufacture isn't the problem, its delivery.uziq wrote:
actually there are plenty of people in virology who think that 'developing nations' could manufacture vaccines easily. the process of manufacturing a vaccine is not quite like making semiconductors. the AZ/J&J-type tech is actually rather rudimentary. these countries already produce their own vaccines for any number of comparable illnesses. they could easily re-tool and produce covid vaccines.
Much easier to build a parallel line in a factory in a first world country with a growth culture on tap than in a third world country.
Then there's the management culture, I wouldn't take a medicine manufactured in India.
too bad your racism gets in the way of, er, science. not the first time that’s happened though, is it?
meanwhile things in china seem to be going really well.
https://twitter.com/billbirtles/status/ … 10051?s=21
with no clear exit strategy from their model of infinite lockdowns and frequent forced isolation of 30,000+ people being sent away to shadowy facilities, this nice new development looks great. because devolving into a dystopian Maoist nightmare over a mild sore throat is really a price worth paying.
more people died of drink-driving over the holidays. hope you’re ready to put the bottle down and sell your car. public transport is, after all, much less lethal (and much better for the environment).Dilbert_X wrote:
Only 18 deaths, as long as its not you nothing to worry about.
it makes total sense to cripple entire sectors of the economy, continually write £2 billion stimulus cheques/extend furlough options indefinitely, for 18 deaths a day. yep.
obviously ‘all avoidable deaths are a tragedy’. but treatments are getting better all the time and the disease in its current phase is getting milder, not more severe. there is NO LONGER a relationship between new cases and skyrocketing death rates. this has been the case since mass vaccination has been achieved.
90% of people who end up in ICU are unvaccinated. at some point the rest of prudent, law-abiding, cooperative society is going to get sick and tired of not seeing their loved ones, not having a much-needed psychological break and rest over xmas holidays, etc, for the sake of a few sods who won’t do the right fucking thing.
What if I told you
Not everyone can be vaccinated
I'm sure it'll be a convincing argument for the people of Africa - "Guys, you all need to be injected with some stuff for which the consequences are unknown so little Tarquin can have a gap year backpacking in South America"
Not everyone can be vaccinated
I'm sure it'll be a convincing argument for the people of Africa - "Guys, you all need to be injected with some stuff for which the consequences are unknown so little Tarquin can have a gap year backpacking in South America"
Fuck Israel
here we go again with the vaccine skepticism. rofl. like rolling over a log and seeing a nice fossilized turd beneath it. 'for which the consequences are unknown' . yep, we've certainly never tested or collected data on the 'consequences' of taking a vaccine in the last 2.5 years. newp.
i'm sure 30-40% of the general population have cast-iron solid medical reasons for why they can't take a vaccine.
why do you even talk such arrant fucking nonsense? are you really that bored in your life dilbert that you want to daily spend your time pursuing silly-billy arguments?
you're right, there is a tiny portion of the general population who can't take vaccines and who are extremely clinically vulnerable generally. i know and am close-to one of them, and know what it means dealing with their experience of this pandemic, very well. my entire family are daily struggling to deal with the severe alteration to life that the pandemic has brought to an already medically fraught situation. but these people are a fraction of one percent of the population, meanwhile entire sectors of the economy are being destroyed. it doesn't make any sense and the sacrifice, social and economic, being asked of society as a whole is not proportionate.
i also really don't know why this is always about 'tarquins' wanting to go backpacking or to beach parties. it's so very, very silly. hundreds of thousands of people have been out of work this christmas period because of short-notice closures to retail and hospitality. we are talking about vast immiseration of people who already live on the breadline. and you keep distracting the discussion as if it's all about posh people having the time of their lives. a very weird default of imagination, methinks.
i'm sure 30-40% of the general population have cast-iron solid medical reasons for why they can't take a vaccine.
why do you even talk such arrant fucking nonsense? are you really that bored in your life dilbert that you want to daily spend your time pursuing silly-billy arguments?
you're right, there is a tiny portion of the general population who can't take vaccines and who are extremely clinically vulnerable generally. i know and am close-to one of them, and know what it means dealing with their experience of this pandemic, very well. my entire family are daily struggling to deal with the severe alteration to life that the pandemic has brought to an already medically fraught situation. but these people are a fraction of one percent of the population, meanwhile entire sectors of the economy are being destroyed. it doesn't make any sense and the sacrifice, social and economic, being asked of society as a whole is not proportionate.
i also really don't know why this is always about 'tarquins' wanting to go backpacking or to beach parties. it's so very, very silly. hundreds of thousands of people have been out of work this christmas period because of short-notice closures to retail and hospitality. we are talking about vast immiseration of people who already live on the breadline. and you keep distracting the discussion as if it's all about posh people having the time of their lives. a very weird default of imagination, methinks.
Last edited by uziq (2021-12-30 00:39:44)
lmao fucking please. you are killing me with this nonsense. literally laughing out loud.SuperJail Warden wrote:
The issue with vaccination in developed countries is that we have reached a point where we cannot convince a sizable enough group to take the vaccine. There is also a sizable enough group of otherwise nice people who were skeptical of the vaccine but took it anyway. We don't need stories about bad COVID vaccines in developing countries spooking otherwise okay people in our part of the world.
I agree with you on reopening and returning to normalcy but risking our own domestic messaging on vaccines in order to help the developing world...nah. I rather just send them vaccines produced here or elsewhere.
half of americans have been suckered into not taking a vaccine because of bipartisan american politics. that's your own unique insanity. please don't try and deny 2/3rds of the world's population equitable access to life-saving vaccines because 'it might spook the american people'. you people jump at your own shadow.
Here we've had two years of no lockdowns to speak of, business as usual, people holidaying locally, all effectively before vaccines.uziq wrote:
i also really don't know why this is always about 'tarquins' wanting to go backpacking or to beach parties. it's so very, very silly. hundreds of thousands of people have been out of work this christmas period because of short-notice closures to retail and hospitality. we are talking about vast immiseration of people who already live on the breadline. and you keep distracting the discussion as if it's all about posh people having the time of their lives. a very weird default of imagination, methinks.
Now that we're at 90% vaccination and have basically removed all local travel restrictions cases and hospitalisations are exploding, consumer confidence has collapsed, businesses are shutting down.
Bowing to the travel obsessed has been ruinous.
Fuck Israel
2 years of no lockdowns to speak of? are you serious? ask someone in melbourne how harmonious and simple their last 2 years has been. or even a business owner in sydney. you are a joke. you keep speaking for the experience of a sparsely populated state of 6 million as if it's an example to lead the world by. are you seriously so fucking stuck in your own perspective on everything?
evidently the majority of australians are sick and tired of restrictions.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-58406526
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal … 58lk5.html
evidently the majority of australians are sick and tired of restrictions.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-58406526
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal … 58lk5.html
maybe you should take a lesson from the 'brexit' political rulebook you keep quoting at me and listen to the wisdom of the majority, eh chap?A majority of Australians want political leaders to stick to a national cabinet deal to ease restrictions when the vaccination rate hits key targets, with 62 per cent backing the plan and only 24 per cent saying states and territories should go their own way.
Voters are increasing their support for vaccinations at the same time many of them decide the country will not return to zero coronavirus cases, with 54 per cent saying it is not possible to achieve “complete suppression” again.
Last edited by uziq (2021-12-30 01:08:57)
I just coughed up a little phlegm. Am I going to die?