when have i ever called their culture abhorrent?
i am really done trying to educate you on the basics of korean culture. a country that was rebuilt and levelled up using american funding and international aid from the 1950s isn't some hermetically sealed monoculture. you really don't know very much about this region at all, and only want to view it as if they're leading an experiment in racist ethno-states. they're not.
korea's culture and the way of life here are extremely westernized. k-pop? k-drama? not exactly autochthonous artforms, dipshit. most of korea is focussed around seoul and seoul is a world-class cosmopolitan hub, and, as such, is not dramatically different in the surface patterns of life from living in any other major world city: people go to work in offices, live in apartments, drink and dine out on international cuisine at restaurants, spend time in coffee shops sipping on ethiopian or south american blends, etc. the traditional and older forms of life are buried beneath the, you know, 'global capitalism' stuff. a westerner could move here and live their entire life speaking and hearing english, going to american convenience and grocery stores, eating western food and drinking western beer. many young people do just that, enticed over by the teaching contracts and opportunity to save money and have a little adventure. they don't come here because they're drawn to OmG the puRe and unBleMisHed aSiaN MoNoculture, which has been preserved for thousands of years!!!
i've explained to you before that the ethnic anxieties of old-timer korean conservatives stem mostly from their fear of losing their identity to near-neighbours. japan and china specifically (chinese-koreans and japanese-koreans still face prejudices here because of the recent history). that's perhaps understandable from a historical point-of-view when you consider that japan literally tried to deprogram and genocide korean culture within the last century. there are more recent events too which means koreans have had to dig deep into national pride to pull through, such as the IMF crisis of the late 1990s. but the idea that koreans are motivated by an ethnic or racist view of the world and view themselves as a 'pure nation' is almost laughable. young people here go to japanese restaurants, drive german cars, watch british rom-coms, and idealize places like paris and new york. that's a pretty strange 'monoculture'. precisely what characterizes modern, contemporary korea is the way that it's sort of an apotheosis of global capitalism, a place where unrestrained consumption and materialism dominate all things, rather than vestigial attachments to hoary old concepts like 'racial purity' and 'ethnic pride'. it's 21st century, late capitalism in one of its purest forms, rather than the old and defunct image of a 'hermit kingdom'.
i would say that clan and family are far more important here than any nebulous, western concept of 'race'. koreans from the different provinces all reserve long-lasting enmities for one another, for example, going back not only through recent history (certain provinces had left-wing and student uprisings which were brutally repressed) but back into the medieval pre-joseon period when korea was made up of 'three kingdoms' and many smaller warring factions – not altogether unlike the united kingdom and the sense of multiple peoples being included in the designation 'british'. the application of race theory and ethnic identity to modern korea was a bit of cynical nationalism from the ruling elites, a loan-concept in the era of imperialism. koreans will first ask each other which family and which area they're from, and, trust me, people from the north-west provinces don't consider themselves to be perfect kin with, say, people from the south-west areas like busan. they talk about them as if they're another group, sometimes not to be trusted, and marriages between these groups can still be highly contentious affairs. that's a pretty strange 'monoculture' you're presenting, there, isn't it?
Last edited by uziq (2021-11-14 23:35:49)