Jay wrote:
No, I had my personal philosophy in place before I read it.
Ha ha OK.
Didn't you participate in the invasion of two countries which had nothing to do with 9/11, and failed to invade the country which did?
That was a level-headed response by stern emotionless male republicans who thought it through.
This really looks like rational people communicating like grown ups.
The bottom line is an emotional response in men is seen as a good thing, in women its a bad thing.
The one thing I would say is in my experience women can't deal with failure or criticism, so they gravitate to areas where failure isn't a problem, eg accounting, publishing, media etc.
A typo or poor logical argument in a book about the dresses Henry VIII's wives wore doesn't matter.
A typo or poor logical argument in the lines of code which control the tail surfaces of a jetliner does matter.
This is what I've seen numerous times:
Man "You got this wrong, please fix it"
Other man "OK"
Man "You got this wrong, please fix it"
Woman "You're saying I got this wrong? How dare you! Do you know how hard I worked on this? You wouldn't accuse a man of getting something wrong! Did you just look at my tits? You looked at my tits! I'm going to my doctor to get a certificate for a week off for cramps then I'm going to my lawyer"
Man "OK, we're never hiring another woman"
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2020-05-02 21:34:35)