Last edited by uziq (2019-05-16 08:45:35)
Considering he has no desire to ever have kids and believes in malthusian population bombs, I think he should mind his business and enjoy the retirement benefits that will be paid to him by other peoples kids and grandkids.uziq wrote:
right. complaining about parents teaching their kids to become 'more accepting' of other lifestyles is not the same thing as complaining about the state of society/the way it's heading. why the hell else do you care how a parent chooses to raise their kid? it's none of your business. seeing as cross-dressing is definitely NOT a mental illness or genetic defect i think you have no credible interest in how parents choose to raise their children.
NJ passed a law saying we need to integrate the accomplishments of LGBT people in our history lessons. They are going beyond just acceptance but making us now inflate the accomplishments of trannies and put them in the same league with great men like General Eisenhower and Theodore Roosevelt just like the blacks do with black history month.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I think teaching kids that the gays and trans are around and that they shouldn't care that much or get freaked out is way better than rewarding or ignoring intolerance and hate, which is really the harmful development here. And perhaps if children were taught that it's fine if a dude puts on a skirt or a chick dates another chick, later some wouldn't have to live in fear and develop so many satellite complexes that can come with staying in the closet. But no! Think of the…children.
How parents choose to raise their kids is an issue, how many times have you ridiculed War Man's parents?uziq wrote:
right. complaining about parents teaching their kids to become 'more accepting' of other lifestyles is not the same thing as complaining about the state of society/the way it's heading. why the hell else do you care how a parent chooses to raise their kid? it's none of your business. seeing as cross-dressing is definitely NOT a mental illness or genetic defect i think you have no credible interest in how parents choose to raise their children.
So it is wrong, thanks for supporting my argument.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
converted his grandkids and then their feckless parents with NRA talking points.
Maybe, should still not be rammed down the throats of small children when they aren't developed enough to take a rational view.uziq wrote:
norms are not concrete. they change over time. your categorisation of them as ‘aberrant’ (when what you probably privately mean is ‘abhorrent’) is an example of your outdated norm clashing with the new norm. you are not appealing to some categorically provable, objective ‘normal’ reality, here: we are discussing human behaviour and society. homosexuality is as old as our species so who are you to call it ‘abnormal’? the difference is that society now is making attempts to become tolerant and understanding of these age-old groups instead of suspicious, fearful and bigoted.
How can you tell if someone is gay?SuperJail Warden wrote:
Flamboyant gay men are bad at customer service jobs because they have bitchy attitudes.
society has been using toy guns and barbies, thinly veiled cartoons and pink/blue clothing to 'ram' identity down children's throats for decades before they are of 'rational' age.. judging by the number of raging incels on the planet at the moment, and what with the nasty discourse about 'men going their own way' and feminist critics, i think we need a few more drag queens. america has a much bigger problem with hyper-masculinity than it does with homosexuality.Dilbert_X wrote:
Maybe, should still not be rammed down the throats of small children when they aren't developed enough to take a rational view.uziq wrote:
norms are not concrete. they change over time. your categorisation of them as ‘aberrant’ (when what you probably privately mean is ‘abhorrent’) is an example of your outdated norm clashing with the new norm. you are not appealing to some categorically provable, objective ‘normal’ reality, here: we are discussing human behaviour and society. homosexuality is as old as our species so who are you to call it ‘abnormal’? the difference is that society now is making attempts to become tolerant and understanding of these age-old groups instead of suspicious, fearful and bigoted.
Last edited by uziq (2019-05-21 04:29:57)
You should be "developed" enough by now, but aren't so still can't take a rational view.Dilbert_X wrote:
Maybe, should still not be rammed down the throats of small children when they aren't developed enough to take a rational view.uziq wrote:
norms are not concrete. they change over time. your categorisation of them as ‘aberrant’ (when what you probably privately mean is ‘abhorrent’) is an example of your outdated norm clashing with the new norm. you are not appealing to some categorically provable, objective ‘normal’ reality, here: we are discussing human behaviour and society. homosexuality is as old as our species so who are you to call it ‘abnormal’? the difference is that society now is making attempts to become tolerant and understanding of these age-old groups instead of suspicious, fearful and bigoted.
I don't know why they need their own accent and walk like they do. This is all Hollywood's fault for getting flowerly gay people on T.V.Dilbert_X wrote:
How can you tell if someone is gay?SuperJail Warden wrote:
Flamboyant gay men are bad at customer service jobs because they have bitchy attitudes.
Don't worry, they'll tell you.
