BF2S Forums Transgender people are now allowed into the military

the pendulum really hasn't swung too far, and if you think the influence of non-hetero people is really destabilising society and sending it all to the dogs, you are a deluded and frightened old fool. 'normal white heterosexual men' have been a minority in teaching since long before your satanic coven of lesbians or cabal of socialist revolutionaries took hold with their trendy ideologies; for certain age groups women teachers have always been the norm. (if you want to talk about marginalisation, take a look at the figures throughout history for female headteachers and people in senior positions in education; or look at the gender pay gap for professors in university faculties. hmm ...)

you are basically paranoid and hysterical, and that's fine, it's basically what's expected of you now you are old and past your prime and staring at the abyss of your own childless end. but society will tick along just fine without you. and jay, you'll probably get used to having a tranny kid.

I wonder what foreboding percentage of openly queer individuals make up the total population of the US Senate.

Dilbert_X wrote:

uziq wrote:

you are basically paranoid and hysterical

I miss the days when a diagnosis of hysteria meant a woman had her womb removed, that stopped them giggling.

for certain age groups women teachers have always been the norm.

You don't find this disturbing? Doesn't it prove my point?

my point being you’re complaining about straight hetero males being ‘excluded’ from a profession which, historically (and certainly pre-LGBTQ era), they have had zero fucking interest in anyway — and when they do, structurally speaking they disproportionately occupy the highest positions and take the best pay. what the fuck are you complaining about?!? more women teach pre-teens than men because men basically don’t want to, not that they’re been systematically excluded. i’ve never had a female head of department or headteacher. figure it out.

if you can give me a clear example where ‘not being LBGTQ is considered abnormal’, and show me some of this worrying pendulum swing, i’d be all ears. frankly i think you are talking utter bollocks and i suspect you’ll struggle to even find some niche, private, hippy steiner school-like institution where heterosexual people are criticised as ‘abnormal’. you’re a crank. and people who are obsessed with other people’s sex lives are normally not far away from some sexual dysfunction of their own. go get laid.

Last edited by uziq (2019-03-31 06:19:59)

‘i don’t see a huge gender disparity although men do take up more [senior] positions than women despite being less than a quarter of the overall pool’.



witness the plight of the great excluded hetero male!

I'm more interested in hearing about these roving militias of pro-trans people.  Sounds exciting.

It's not like there is an established, comprehensive guideline and best practice regarding gender reassignment surgery that includes consistent medical documentation of gender dysphoria, what is called a "real-life" test wherein the person wanting the reassignment more or less has to roleplay as a trans in real life for a certain amount of time, then go through hormone therapy for a certain amount of time, THEN get assessed for gender reassignment.  Nope, you go to a doctor who is on board with BIG TRANS, get put under and come out 6 hours later with new genitalia.

all this hand-wringing and faux concern over what in some cases is surely teenage angst and exploration of sexual identity is silly.

The reversal rate for gender reassignment is something like 2%.  Not nearly a majority, but this number does highlight that a person's understanding of their own gender may be...fluid over the course of their lifetime, and that external reasons (most likely social pressure and acceptance imo) are a significant factor in gender dysphoria.

NYT wrote:

Then again, some women may not be eager to open the profession to more men. Men who do become teachers tend to be promoted more quickly into senior administrative positions, said Christine L. Williams, a professor of sociology at the University of Texas who has studied the so-called glass escalator. Nearly half of all school principals are men. If educators are determined to get more men into classrooms, Professor Williams said, the best way would simply be to upgrade the conditions and pay of the job. “And that,” she said, “would positively impact the job for women as well.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/sund … ching.html

I thought the closing paragraph of this article was particularly relevant.

I was more referring to the lopsided ease of promotion it referred to, and how it ties into the observation of there being a strange amount of men in education assuming administrative roles compared to actual teaching. As for pay, I do I think making it a more attractive job involves more than just that, but it's still a huge step in the right direction in attracting better personnel. People endlessly gripe about low quality services, but when confronted with the prospect of doing anything about it they recoil and tighten their purse strings.

Thats the interminable problem, how to deal with women in the workforce when they're inevitably the ones to bear and raise children.

I will always quote my experience at Ford:

Two employees, one male, one female, over ~10 years

The man slogged away solidly for ten years, delivered on all his projects, completed training courses etc.

The woman had five children and was perpetually on maternity leave, when she was there she arrived late, spent the day administering her family issues, left early and took time out every time one of her kids was ill, had to attend a school event etc. As she was never there and couldn't be relied on she was never assigned to a project of significance and what little she was given she never delivered on, someone else having to pick up the pieces in addition to their own job.

After the ten years she sued the company, because she reckoned she was due all the promotions her male colleague had received and it "wasn't fair" that he was ahead of her.

So what do you do? I don't know.

The Colorado school shooting was committed by a gay kid and a tranny. As I said before, trannies are crazy.

let’s look at the rates of straight heterosexual school shooters vs homosexual shooters ...

uziq wrote:

let’s look at the rates of straight heterosexual school shooters vs homosexual shooters ...

A lot of transgender people are into it as a fad and need help. The Columbine kids inspired a lot of people to commit mass shootings too.

If these two dumb kids actually killed a lot of people they would have become heroes and icons in the militant transgender community. A lot of depressed LGBT kids would want to follow their examples against "the bullies."

I don't know what study you are referring to. I just know that kids follow trends and depressed and sad kids will follow whatever trend that makes them feel less bad about themselves or provides a community. Transgender people are genuinely trying to convince more people to engage in their lifestyles the same way gay people encourage straight people to "experiment". Unfortunately, while you can pretend you never sucked that dick, pumping your body full of hormones isn't something that can be reversed.