BF2S Forums Minimum wage laws

Cybargs wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

how does it not?

Are you really this dumb?

so youre telling me the local korean store, which hires people, pays taxes, has local suppliers somehow doesn't help grow the local economy? What difference does it make if its opened by a whitey or a black guy.

Because the store doesn't hire from the local community. The Korean store brings in people from outside of community. As in from another city's community. The taxes go to the state not the local people. The supplies aren't bought locally either. They aren't buying milk wholesale from the local black people. If you want to replace Korean with French or something else so your Asian side isn't offended please go ahead but the races isn't the point. It is that they are sucking money out without contributing anything back. If the Wal-Mart can give local people jobs and cheaper shit than it is no lose if they blow out every Korean store in the city.

It isn't about the race of the store you fucking idiot.

Like I said at the start, it is an example of a small business that doesn't contribute anything back. A black store is still worthless compared to the Wal-Mart. A Korean store is just a more obvious example of a small business not worth protecting from a chain outlet.

Steve-0 wrote:

why would i take your advice, or when, poofter?

you have no reason to, and i couldn't care less if you did or not. however anyone with 15 minutes and the search function can see that the moment you changed from pro-uzi to anti-uzi was the moment i started saying 'enough' to your frankly embarrassing drunken rants. spill as much bile about me as you want, old man, the only negative words i've ever said to you are about your drinking problem. if you didn't like hearing it, you should have stopped routinely trashing the forums and locking threads like a petulant child after one too many glasses of wine. i don't read a single thing you say to me seriously anymore, because i know that's the place it comes from: low level denial.

also i don't know how many times i have to tell you this, but i won extremely competitive scholarships to cover my education. i've even posted pictures of fees-receipts on here before. i'm not taking anything from 'the public tit' or "daddies accountant". i won it. based on my own ability. one out of an applying pool of 400+. i know this complicates your dumb image of me as a 'leecher', rather than someone who could have earned their keep, but don't let the seething envy eat you up. there are better things to spend your time thinking about.

by the way i know 'poofter' is a rather england-specific word, but it's on the same level of insult here as calling someone a "golly idiot". if you were trying to be funny, rather than insulting, you could use the word 'poofter'. it's 15 levels of insult below even 'douche'. please try again.

Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-07-19 03:17:06)

yes calling a straight person a 'faggot' is also deeply wounding, and makes you look very intelligent.

'faggot' reminds me of the 90's and nu-metal. a lot of homo-erotic moshers all very hasty to call one another gay. hmmm.

uuuh the club-scene originated with black people and gays. often at the same time. might want to check your history.

hyper-masculinity? i don't think you've ever been in a club. new york's loft parties in the 70's and 80's were not "hyper-masculine".

the first ever clubnight was called 'love saves the day'. figure it out.

all that 80's hyper-masculinity in the club scene.

clubbing and rap music are not related. rap music has never been a 'club' genre. hip-hop, maybe. west/east coast rap had nothing to do with night-clubs. the late 80's in club-music was the turn from disco and instrumental music towards machine-music: (acid) house, techno. ecstasy, air-horns, neon-clothing. not exactly the sort of environment you'd catch a gangster-rapper in, looking tough.



and where does this idea of 'compensation' come into anything? clubs were dark and anonymous spaces where people could go and be liberated, to act as they please. hence why marginalized peoples - blacks, queers, the eccentric andy warhol types - were the first people to really use them. they were places where gay men could pick up gay men without getting busted by cops. places where people could take drugs and dance all night and act as lasciviously as they pleased. no 'compensation'. no 'fronting'. no 'hyper-masculinity'. the whole idea of clubs is a place to be free of social constraints. nobody 'acts up' in them. they're very egalitarian spaces. everyone is left to pursue their own idea of pleasure.

you really haven't ever been to a proper nightclub have you?

Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-07-19 04:04:52)

seeing as the majority of people who go clubbing are straight people seeking straight people, i wouldn't say the fact they have equal regard and don't care about gay people makes them 'gay pickup joints'. nice casual homophobia though. what a sad little man. so insecure. i'm sure it's a big deal for you to go to a nightclub where there may be gay people having fun as well as straight people. a real challenge.

blame dilbert for side-tracking the discussion with his etymological fascination with the word 'faggot', blacks, and nightclubs.

i.e. scared shitless white man syndrome.

or save people from driving forever to get to a store, coz the koreans are the only ones ballsy enough to open up in a black neighborhood.

yeah because every mom and pop store is a monopoly.