Two 4 stars?

2006-05-27 06:17:03

#1

Chanquad: Member; +-1|6786|Sweden

Hey whatsup with this?

both chopper_charlie and sgt_maxpowers got the highest rank! Isent it supposed to be one general at a time?

2006-05-27 06:18:45

#2

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6628|Washington, DC

They changed it in the latest patch to have the top 50 Lt. Generals be Generals, which makes sense. They should make it so the highest-ranking General is General of the Armies of the United States.

Last edited by ExecutionerStyle (2006-05-27 06:19:12)

2006-05-27 06:19:57

#3

RonnY[NL]: Chanetoy Dugali; +309|6709|Groningen / Netherlands

they changed that in the 1.3 patch, now 50 people can be general or something

Last edited by RonnY[NL] (2006-05-27 06:20:27)

2006-05-27 06:20:30

#4

I.M.I Militant: We Are Not Alone In Here; +297|6717|Melbourne, Australia

i think e.a should stop giving away this game

2006-05-27 06:23:35

#5

Avenger: Member; +0|6558|somewhere..............

than why arent there
50 generals?

2006-05-27 06:24:45

#6

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6628|Washington, DC

It will probably update the 1st of June, like SMotC.

2006-05-27 06:25:44

#7

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6714

Avenger wrote:
than why arent there
50 generals?

because most officers are dumbass's, DUH!

always remember, the more important the job, the dumber the officer

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2006-05-27 06:26:07

#8

=TFS=DEVILS.HITMAN: Member; +60|6645|Under the River

I dont know

2006-05-27 06:26:47

#9

RonnY[NL]: Chanetoy Dugali; +309|6709|Groningen / Netherlands

Avenger wrote:
than why arent there
50 generals?

maybe coz they havent got the requirments yet

2006-05-27 06:27:03

#10

MuseSeeker: 2142 Soldier: Behenaut; +110|6773|EUR

Yeah EA are right fools for giving away the game to practically anyone who started a week ago. I admit bf2 is a fun game but it could be legendary if EA liked it as much as we do. (liking it game wise not money)

2006-05-27 06:28:48