the prussian and old German birds are awesome and heraldic. the bald eagle is the staple subject of a whole lot of 1980's kitsch and dodgy neon paintings.
you don't see paintings hung inside wood-paneled motels of prussian birds against purple thunder-and-lightening with portraits of elvis in the foreground, though.RTHKI wrote:
not exactly plastering the flag
Wonder how long before WikiLeaks leaks everything to do with Snowden? Freedom of speech and all.Yahoo! wrote:
Snowden leaves Hong Kong, may head for Venezuela
http://news.yahoo.com/former-nsa-contra … 43121.html
[...] The anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said Snowden was heading for a "democratic nation" which it did not name [...]
"The WikiLeaks legal team and I are interested in preserving Mr Snowden's rights and protecting him as a person," [...]
The eagle isn't on the Austrian flag though.
The variant with the coat of arms is only used by federal representatives like the president and as war flag by the military.
The European flag doesn't have an eagle either.
Besides, I was responding to those pictures of the flag of the US with the eagle superimposed that Extra Medium posted.
The variant with the coat of arms is only used by federal representatives like the president and as war flag by the military.
The European flag doesn't have an eagle either.
Besides, I was responding to those pictures of the flag of the US with the eagle superimposed that Extra Medium posted.
do you think it's a little funny the news/outrage are mostly directed at the person and his life? who cares where snowden is. talk about the fact the west is becoming like THAT ORWELL FELLAunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Wonder how long before WikiLeaks leaks everything to do with Snowden? Freedom of speech and all.Yahoo! wrote:
Snowden leaves Hong Kong, may head for Venezuela
http://news.yahoo.com/former-nsa-contra … 43121.html
[...] The anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks said Snowden was heading for a "democratic nation" which it did not name [...]
"The WikiLeaks legal team and I are interested in preserving Mr Snowden's rights and protecting him as a person," [...]
Spin 101 - Redirect the argument against the person, not his arguments
Fuck Israel
You think Snowden has any hope of a fair trial?
Of evening seeing a trial?
Look at Pvt. Manning. That is cruel and unusual punishment and I doubt Snowden would ever see the light of day if returned to the US.
Of evening seeing a trial?
Look at Pvt. Manning. That is cruel and unusual punishment and I doubt Snowden would ever see the light of day if returned to the US.
They aren't the same. Manning was a traitor because he violated his oath and put his fellow soldiers in immediate danger. Snowden didn't owe any loyalty to anyone and I'm thankful for his revelations. Manning can rot in prison for the rest of his life while living in constant fear of getting his shit pushed in and I'll be happy.AussieReaper wrote:
You think Snowden has any hope of a fair trial?
Of evening seeing a trial?
Look at Pvt. Manning. That is cruel and unusual punishment and I doubt Snowden would ever see the light of day if returned to the US.
I hope Snowden gets away with it.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
uhm, i'm pretty sure they make you sign a contract when you apply for this type of work stating "don't give away our secrets or we will throw you in a hole, forever." it doesn't make sense for people to hate on manning yet praise snowden as a heroine for doing the exact same thing.
trai·tor
/ˈtrātər/
Noun
A person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc.
he was entrusted with state secrets under the condition that he not share them with anyone else.
i'm not disagreeing with what snowden did but i've been getting sick of hearing the same people who ripped into bradley manning put snowden on a pedestal when they're just two sides of the same coin.
trai·tor
/ˈtrātər/
Noun
A person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc.
he was entrusted with state secrets under the condition that he not share them with anyone else.
i'm not disagreeing with what snowden did but i've been getting sick of hearing the same people who ripped into bradley manning put snowden on a pedestal when they're just two sides of the same coin.
They really aren't different at all. They both swore oaths. I guess Jays saying being in uniform and taking an oath is more important than it is in the civilian world. Manning is gay, though. Makes it easier to not give a shit, to some people at least.
Taiwan why are you calling manning and snowden 'heroines'? more syllables doesn't make it better.
Manning leaked out diplomatic cables and other classified military operations that do affect operational security and the US' diplomatic standing. Snowden released information confirming an NSA program to spy on US citizens. If he published agent list and specific NSA datacentres and outposts, then yeah he'd be the same as Manning.13/f/taiwan wrote:
uhm, i'm pretty sure they make you sign a contract when you apply for this type of work stating "don't give away our secrets or we will throw you in a hole, forever." it doesn't make sense for people to hate on manning yet praise snowden as a heroine for doing the exact same thing.
trai·tor
/ˈtrātər/
Noun
A person who betrays a friend, country, principle, etc.
he was entrusted with state secrets under the condition that he not share them with anyone else.
i'm not disagreeing with what snowden did but i've been getting sick of hearing the same people who ripped into bradley manning put snowden on a pedestal when they're just two sides of the same coin.
That and Snowden threw away his 6 figure salary job while having one of the best posting in the world (hawaii) and a super hot girlfriend. Snoweden sacrificed way more than what Manning had.
how can you say snowden sacrificed more when manning has been in jail forever and will never be released? wow dude you must be fucking dumb. I guess if you're not making a lot of money and banging a ballerina your life doesn't matter just go to jail it's no big deal. sure snowden is hating life out, free, doing what he wants, likely being toasted by Americas enemies in fancy hotels. manning got off easy
and betrayed his country just the same. which makes him even more an idiot.Cybargs wrote:
Snoweden sacrificed way more than what Manning had.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
are you guys serious? so because he loses a nice house he's suffering far worse than the dude who has been locked up in jail getting terrorised? cannot believe the stupidity I am reading. you guys are basically placing material niceties above freedom. are you that fucking dense?
and lets not get into the traitor thing again. outside of military settings that are life/death, treason is an outmoded concept. like a civilian in a globalised world should put up with state tyranny because of 'allegiance'. please.
and lets not get into the traitor thing again. outside of military settings that are life/death, treason is an outmoded concept. like a civilian in a globalised world should put up with state tyranny because of 'allegiance'. please.
snoweden is looking at life in prison (if not death penalty) if usa gets hold of him. also, i'm not sure what i'd prefer - to live the rest of my life in prison or spend it running away, hiding, and in constant fear.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
are you guys serious? so because he loses a nice house he's suffering far worse than the dude who has been locked up in jail getting terrorised? cannot believe the stupidity I am reading. you guys are basically placing material niceties above freedom. are you that fucking dense?
you are forgetting one little thing - the law. you know, the fundamental principal behind any orderly human society, huh? he should "put up with state tyranny" because he's a citizen of that particular nation.and lets not get into the traitor thing again. outside of military settings that are life/death, treason is an outmoded concept. like a civilian in a globalised world should put up with state tyranny because of 'allegiance'. please.
fuck "globalised world". i hope they get that brainwashed fucking moron (whom, ironically, they created themselves). and if not, i sure hope he's found with an ice axe stuck in his head one day.
Last edited by Shahter (2013-06-25 02:18:08)
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
the law is fundamental but you should look up 'legitimation crisis'. it's a term invented by good little Marxists
one brainwashed cretin who abandoned his position of importance and responsibility for... ummm... opportunity to stand up for so called "principals" he'd been indoctrinated with, constitutes "legitimation crisis" now? really?Uzique The Lesser wrote:
the law is fundamental but you should look up 'legitimation crisis'. it's a term invented by good little Marxists
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
They both signed a document, there's no moral difference between either of them.Jay wrote:
They aren't the same. Manning was a traitor because he violated his oath and put his fellow soldiers in immediate danger. Snowden didn't owe any loyalty to anyone and I'm thankful for his revelations. Manning can rot in prison for the rest of his life while living in constant fear of getting his shit pushed in and I'll be happy.AussieReaper wrote:
You think Snowden has any hope of a fair trial?
Of evening seeing a trial?
Look at Pvt. Manning. That is cruel and unusual punishment and I doubt Snowden would ever see the light of day if returned to the US.
I hope Snowden gets away with it.
I don't believe Manning put any fellow soldier in 'immediate danger', especially, no more so than Sgt Bayles or the average grunt kicking in doors and abusing civilians.
Their fellow citizens will probably die as a result of both their actions, the only question is whether the crimes they exposed are greater than the crime of exposing them.
Fuck Israel
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … meron.htmlDavid Cameron has been warned against sending arms to Syrian rebels amid fears they would end up in the hands of Islamist terrorists who target the West.
Up to 3,000 surface-to-air missiles have gone missing in Libya since the conflict - and spy chiefs say the state has become the 'Tesco' of the world's illegal arms trade.
More than one million tonnes of weapons belonging to Colonel Gaddafi were looted from arms dumps after the dictator was toppled in October 2011.
MI6 agents fear large numbers of weapons - which included 22,000 shoulder-launched missiles capable of bringing down an aircraft - have been smuggled out of Libya to groups linked to Al Qaeda.
Security sources are said to fear that, if the rebels fighting tyrant Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria are armed by the West, a similar situation could arise there - with the weapons falling into the hands of Islamic extremists in the country.
It is understood MI6 estimates there are now more weapons in Libya than the entire arsenal of the British Army — and much of it is unsecured.
The Libyan government remains in a precarious position, with large parts of the army dominated by local militias.
There were thought to be 22,000 shoulder-launched anti-aircraft missiles, known as manpads, at the time of Gaddafi's death in October 2011. And although the majority are believed to have been destroyed MI6 estimates about 3,000 are still unaccounted for.
Just one such missile could bring down a civilian airliner if it fell into the wrong hands. As well as the security services, several military figures have deep reservations about any plans to arm the rebels in Syria.
At this point, I don't know which group is using the other.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23109196The West should have tried talking to the Taliban a decade ago after they had just been toppled from power, the UK's top general in Afghanistan has said.
Gen Nick Carter said it would have been much easier to find a political solution when they were on the run.
His comments in the Guardian come days after attempts to bring the Taliban to the negotiating table stalled.
Gen Carter also warned Afghan forces would need military and financial support after troops leave in 2014.
The Kabul government would have only shaky control over some areas, he said.
Negotiation attempts
A major conference on the future of Afghanistan held in Bonn, Germany, over a decade ago did not include the defeated Taliban former government of Afghanistan.
Gen Carter, deputy commander of the Nato-led coalition, acknowledged it was easy to be wise with the benefit of hindsight but added: "Back in 2002, the Taliban were on the run.
"I think that at that stage, if we had been very prescient, we might have spotted that a final political solution to what started in 2001, from our perspective, would have involved getting all Afghans to sit at the table and talk about their future.
"The problems that we have been encountering over the period since then are essentially political problems, and political problems are only ever solved by people talking to each other."
It would have been smarter still to talk to them before the invasion, then we could have avoided invading the ME.
Except invading the ME was the primary objective all along wasn't it?
Fuck Israel
hindsight is 20/20 and that routine eye check only cost $6 trillion dollars