| Continue pressing for UN Security Council Sanctions | 17% | 17% - 21 | ||||
| Use Backchannel diplomacy through Russia | 9% | 9% - 12 | ||||
| Launch a conventional Invasion | 8% | 8% - 10 | ||||
| Let Israel handle it | 13% | 13% - 16 | ||||
| Nuke them into the Stone Age | 27% | 27% - 33 | ||||
| Nothing | 24% | 24% - 30 | ||||
| Total: 122 | ||||||
No & NO.Bubbalo wrote:
I suppose I should have expected that from someone named anzus. Please tell both your name and statement are sarcastic?
I really hope you die in an explosion of some sort in the near future.........Bubbalo wrote:
Well president of what, then? Autralian elections will likely happen late 2007, and we have no president.
Last edited by Cougar (2006-05-26 05:48:06)
this guys got no sense of humour!Bubbalo wrote:
Well president of what, then? Autralian elections will likely happen late 2007, and we have no president.
Iran: Since the president of Iran is an ex-hostage taker from 1979, AND he openly and publicly calls for the destruction of Israel, their govt, isn't a responsible govt.Bubbalo wrote:
You know what I love about you lowing? Your ability to cut straight through the majority of what I say and respond to the least important point. It's like you just can't see that which you can't say is wrong, and just ignore it. It's like a four-year old. How cute!lowing wrote:
Iran and its govt. is not a responsible govt. According to your, logic, why shouldn't Hamas have nukes, the US has them? There is no way you believe all of the bullshit you post on here Bubbalo. You have to try and reach so far down into the barrel to pull out an arguement that it is almost comical. As a matter of fact, it IS comical.
Now, to responde:How do you figure they aren't responsible?lowing wrote:
Iran and its govt. is not a responsible govt.Other than the fact that Hamas is a terrorist organisation? Your logic is flawed. If you were to say that G.W. Bush has his own personal stash of nukes, then this would become an issue.lowing wrote:
According to your, logic, why shouldn't Hamas have nukes, the US has them?
As to why Palestine shouldn't: Given that Israel has nukes, I don't see why they shouldn't. If Israel were to disarm, that might be a different story.
Iran has no ongoing hostilities with any nation, and is one of the most stable governments in the Middle East.I say again: numbers. We don't have them. We could maybe go in under cover of night to place a few bombs. But then, I don't see why we should.anzus wrote:
you left out one option, send in the Aussies! well sort em out!
Last edited by lowing (2006-05-26 15:22:06)
Fuck that, The USA is on its last legs. Bye bye petro dollar, $9 trillion debt ceiling, war costs, lunatic at the helm.Bubbalo wrote:
but you seriously think we should go into Iran to get ourselves in good w/ the US?
Actually, the Iranian president has never taken hostages. Students have. And besides, it could be *very* easily argued that every citizen in Iran led Pahlavi as a hostage. Regardless, is it irresponisble for a government to ake all necessary measures to bring criminals to justice?lowing wrote:
Iran: Since the president of Iran is an ex-hostage taker from 1979, AND he openly and publicly calls for the destruction of Israel, their govt, isn't a responsible govt.
No, by my logic Palestine should be allowed nukes. I feel I should remind the Israel is the aggressor.lowing wrote:
Hamas: NOT ONLY are they a terrorist organization, they are ALSO the legally ELECTED govt. for the Palistinians. Based on this, and your logic, they SHOULD be allowed to have NUKES., "because the US has them".
No Bubbalo, in 1979 the Iranian president WAS one of the hostage takers. It is a fact. SorryBubbalo wrote:
Actually, the Iranian president has never taken hostages. Students have. And besides, it could be *very* easily argued that every citizen in Iran led Pahlavi as a hostage. Regardless, is it irresponisble for a government to ake all necessary measures to bring criminals to justice?lowing wrote:
Iran: Since the president of Iran is an ex-hostage taker from 1979, AND he openly and publicly calls for the destruction of Israel, their govt, isn't a responsible govt.No, by my logic Palestine should be allowed nukes. I feel I should remind the Israel is the aggressor.lowing wrote:
Hamas: NOT ONLY are they a terrorist organization, they are ALSO the legally ELECTED govt. for the Palistinians. Based on this, and your logic, they SHOULD be allowed to have NUKES., "because the US has them".
Last edited by lowing (2006-05-26 22:53:23)
but that would be interesting no?BornToKill67 wrote:
Then it starts into a huge nuclear world war and everyone dies because of all the radiation.andy12 wrote:
Nuke them.I'd like them to get nuked nothing interesting happening in the news nowadyas.
What would be more interesting is seeing which idiot news reporter would get there first just to get the story and soon realize shit I'm dying from radiation. CNN for the win!kr@cker wrote:
but that would be interesting no?BornToKill67 wrote:
Then it starts into a huge nuclear world war and everyone dies because of all the radiation.andy12 wrote:
Nuke them.I'd like them to get nuked nothing interesting happening in the news nowadyas.
Go on just click it, I KNOW you want to!kr@cker wrote:
Take the leash of the Israeli war dogs, they are playing by the rules, only reacting when a bus full of shoppers gets bombed, and catching hell for it. How did the 7 days war go? One israeli infantry division holding off all egypts armour? Someone help me I'm a little fuzzy and cant find a quick reference, God all my books on these things are in the attic.
Damn you anzus, I REALLY want to click on the bad one just to see.
I don't know if they do, hence the question mark I would think they do though.ShreksEsel wrote:
@Cold Fussion:
I didn't know Germany had nuclear weapons... Since when? I'm leaving the country since our constitution doesn't seem to have any weight anymore...
@Americans in this Forum:
What is it about Europe, that most Americans in this forum have a problem with? Just interested...
Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-05-27 00:19:16)
Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-05-27 00:28:28)
I know, a whopping 17% for the UN? All the Viagra in the world couldn't get that bunch of cluster fornicating narcoleptic primates to get any action.Spumantiii wrote:
. What is more shocking however, is how readily some people take to the stupid answer to this poll.
ROFL so true its funnykr@cker wrote:
I know, a whopping 17% for the UN? All the Viagra in the world couldn't get that bunch of cluster fornicating narcoleptic primates to get any action.Spumantiii wrote:
. What is more shocking however, is how readily some people take to the stupid answer to this poll.
Oh yes, blowing up civilian sports stadiums. *Way* within the rules.kr@cker wrote:
Take the leash of the Israeli war dogs, they are playing by the rules, only reacting when a bus full of shoppers gets bombed, and catching hell for it. How did the 7 days war go? One israeli infantry division holding off all egypts armour? Someone help me I'm a little fuzzy and cant find a quick reference, God all my books on these things are in the attic.
Damn you anzus, I REALLY want to click on the bad one just to see.
you really have no clues in life do you!Bubbalo wrote:
Oh yes, blowing up civilian sports stadiums. *Way* within the rules.kr@cker wrote:
Take the leash of the Israeli war dogs, they are playing by the rules, only reacting when a bus full of shoppers gets bombed, and catching hell for it. How did the 7 days war go? One israeli infantry division holding off all egypts armour? Someone help me I'm a little fuzzy and cant find a quick reference, God all my books on these things are in the attic.
Damn you anzus, I REALLY want to click on the bad one just to see.
You ever though maybe people like this are the reason Iran doesn't trust America._j5689_ wrote:
Nuke 'em, we have too many other things to worry about and it's so much more simple when you don't have to deal with them anymore.........ever.