[AoE II HD] Official Thread

2013-04-16 23:11:37

#51

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5814

Fighting the world is getting real old real fast.

https://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/866090369410545210/43F6561510299A1AAE603D97A3F153E190515F1D/

The Mayan distaste for gates provided a hazard for the should-be-killing-each-other Red, Orange, Yellow, and teal army.

https://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/866090369410541411/3776990E757E167972D0C7BF91C4607A99DA49D4/

2013-04-16 23:17:29

#52

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|7000|PNW

It kinda has the problem of Aliens CM where the AI will completely ignore NPC's it should be clawing and just run straight for you instead. They did polish this game up a little bit, but it's all on the surface. The only advantages I see is ease of installation and the wonderful Steam Workshop, for which I've forgiven Valve of many sins.

2013-04-16 23:25:55

#53

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5814

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It kinda has the problem of Aliens CM where the AI will completely ignore NPC's it should be clawing and just run straight for you instead. They did polish this game up a little bit, but it's all on the surface. The only advantages I see is ease of installation and the wonderful Steam Workshop, for which I've forgiven Valve of many sins.

I hate to sound cheap but this was a $10 game. For what they gave us it wasn't worth $20. Just a thought from a cheapskate.

2013-04-16 23:36:16

#54

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|7000|PNW

I tend to judge what I've spent on games by how long I play them and if they were enjoyable.

Battlefield 2 - $50 - 799 hours played - $0.06/hr - fun - success
Space Marine CE - $70 - 938 hours played (o.O) - $0.08/hr - fun - success
Far Cry 3 - $50 - 39 hours played - $1.28/hr - fun - success

However, I have too many fails in cheap games I've bought but never touched because I'd been too busy playing BF2 or Space Marine. If you're only going to play about two hours of AoE2 HD, I'd say your money was wasted.

/Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

2013-04-17 02:44:04

#55

globefish23: sophisticated slacker; +334|6552|Graz, Austria

This new HD version doesn't seem to contain the Conquerers expansion, does it?

2013-04-17 02:55:52

#56

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5814

It does.

2013-04-17 03:14:54

#57

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6851|Little Bentcock

Macbeth wrote:
You can't be that bad Adam. The game is rape rape rape at standard.

I didn't think so either, by cybargs said otherwise.

2013-04-22 16:56:23

#58

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6965|Oxferd Ohire

adams please the lag wasnt as bad with patch 2.1

2013-04-22 17:43:45

#59

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6851|Little Bentcock

Lag has been pretty good lately, except for near the end of the game with 5 of us on

2013-04-22 17:44:23

#60

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6965|Oxferd Ohire

lag was fine all game with 2.1

2013-04-23 10:53:23

#61

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6944

Adams_BJ wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
You can't be that bad Adam. The game is rape rape rape at standard.
I didn't think so either, by cybargs said otherwise.

"you're deadweight adams."

Naw but adams is getting better, he just needs to learn how to micromanage and need better situational awareness.

3 humans and one adams) vs 3 hardest AI went pretty good today.

Last edited by Cybargs (2013-04-23 10:53:43)

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2013-04-23 22:09:51

#62

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6851|Little Bentcock

Hey, my economy was awesome! And I was spewing out longbowmen to help everyone. I am the cornerstone to your victory.

2013-04-25 17:05:27

#63

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6965|Oxferd Ohire

looking back id rather have an aoe1 redo

2013-05-19 15:08:52

#64

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5814

There is no excuse for this game to suffer from so much multilayer lag.

2013-05-19 18:38:09

#65

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6965|Oxferd Ohire

with the patch it was OK with 2 people but with 3 it was pretty bad or i can blame it on the third person bad internet

2013-05-19 19:05:17

#66

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5814

Still though 64 man BF3 servers run fine and they transmit a lot more information than AoE

2013-05-19 20:46:35

#67

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6750|...

is aoe peer to peer?

2013-05-19 20:59:09

#68

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6851|Little Bentcock

Ive played with 5 and it wasn't too bad until late game

2013-05-19 21:04:45

#69

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6965|Oxferd Ohire

aoe2 always hated me playing online

2013-05-19 21:10:19

#70

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5814

jsnipy wrote:
is aoe peer to peer?

Ah yeah it is. That makes a difference. Still such an old thing you would expect it to run better.

2013-05-19 21:13:29

#71

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6851|Little Bentcock

Get the guy with the best ping to host it

2013-05-19 21:13:46

#72

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6851|Little Bentcock

like, for everyone else. So dont make the furthest guy do it.

2013-06-08 20:12:05

#73

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5814

Boy do i love some Castle Blood Auto. only game mode i play.

just like back in the day.

BF2S Forums [AoE II HD] Official Thread

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Adams_BJ wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

jsnipy wrote:

Board footer