An animation with an agenda.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/interactive/2013/mar/25/drone-attacks-pakistan-visualised
It uses a falling parabolic line, connected with a large circle to represent an explosion, with no picture of the delivery vehicle - a UCAV. This metaphor is already used to describe nuclear attacks. Its a fallacy of association, and context. Its the same sort of BS that anti-marijuana-legalisation types use when they show pictures of scabby heroin/meth addicts to justify their claims.
It doesn't mention such things as advance planning of drone use/strikes (including time to plan & setup support/supply chains), and effectiveness of intel (reduced ratio of civlians dead over time).
I'm fairly liberal in my beliefs, but shit the anti-drone crowd are a bunch of stupid hippy muppets.