BF2S Forums DAST Chat

knives rid the world of emos

Am I the only person that's not mad the Blue Angels had to cancel all their 2013 shows? Fuck, guys we have NO money maybe we shouldn't be spending govt dollars to fly expensive planes around for fun? That's stuff we do when we have a surplus.

Let's extend that apathy to the $1million missles we dropped on caves on the afghan/pakistani border. Military is a money pit.  To anyone that counters with the idea that military spending spurs innovative technology - well duh, dump $500 billion a year into any tech-related industry and watch innovations pop out. It'd be nice to spend some of that dough on NASA.

I am not a fan of nonviolent protest. I think the Occupy Wallstreet group would have made some progress if they assassinated politicians and business leaders. Don't even bother mentioning Ghandi or MLK. Both of those movements were backed with a threat of violence.

he is right.

globefish23 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

It'd be nice to spend some of that dough on NASA.

That's why there are secret plans to get North Korea's manned space program going.
A healthy competition like the 1960's space race with Russia.

Also, glorious leader Kim Jong Un as the first human on Mars.
North Korea best Korea!

I imagine if the North Koreans took over Mars they'd make it even less suitable for farming.



Oh God, its 'It's a Small World After All' all over again.

i hate hearing about people complaining about political correctness, or reverse racism, or racial double standards

people are just ashamed about happily embracing their own brand of ignorance

Macbeth wrote:

I am not a fan of nonviolent protest. I think the Occupy Wallstreet group would have made some progress if they assassinated politicians and business leaders. Don't even bother mentioning Ghandi or MLK. Both of those movements were backed with a threat of violence.

man you are psychopathic.

Ron Paul 2016

Macbeth wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

I am not a fan of nonviolent protest. I think the Occupy Wallstreet group would have made some progress if they assassinated politicians and business leaders. Don't even bother mentioning Ghandi or MLK. Both of those movements were backed with a threat of violence.

man you are psychopathic.

Tell me where I am wrong.

You start assassinating people, trolol martial law. good job guys, really helping your cause here.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

I am not a fan of nonviolent protest. I think the Occupy Wallstreet group would have made some progress if they assassinated politicians and business leaders. Don't even bother mentioning Ghandi or MLK. Both of those movements were backed with a threat of violence.

I am big fan of nonviolence and especially nonviolent civil disobedience. I would like to debate you over this subject. Especially your statement regarding the two most prominent nonviolent protests in the last 75 years, but also the general principle. Basically you're dumb, but I can put that much more eloquently.

Gandhi and MLK's success was both off of the back of the cold war. Had the U.S. not had the fear of racial warfare during the Cold war and a 10th of its population picking up communism, the civil rights movement wouldn't have accomplished its goals. Secondly, Gandhi's nonviolence campaign was the last step before a full on Sepoy rebellion. One that a post WW2 U.K. would have not been able to stop especially with the inevitable support of the rebellion by the USSR. During the same period there were examples of violent resistance working such as the wars against the French in Algeria and Vietnam. I can post some historical examples of violence producing results on a domestic level if you would like.

As for the principle of nonviolence I am just going to quote this block of text from elsewhere that puts makes my case better than I could.

In his book How Nonviolence Protects the State, anarchist Peter Gelderloos criticises nonviolence as being ineffective, racist, statist, patriarchal, tactically and strategically inferior to militant activism, and deluded. Gelderloos claims that traditional histories whitewash the impact of nonviolence, ignoring the involvement of militants in such movements as the Indian independence movement and the Civil Rights movement and falsely showing Gandhi and King as being their respective movement's most successful activist. He further argues that nonviolence is generally advocated by privileged white people who expect "oppressed people, many of whom are people of color, to suffer patiently under an inconceivably greater violence, until such time as the Great White Father is swayed by the movement's demands or the pacifists achieve that legendary 'critical mass.'"

You're tiny. Lets not make it personal little man.

dauntless showed me the video. it draws on almost every major conspiracy theory.