cs:go is a total failure. it's a CONSOLE PORT. it is LESS POPULAR than cs1.6 and cs:source. how is that the 'greatest success' since CS? IT ISN'T EVEN AS POPULAR S THE TWO OLDER CS'S. cs:go is a crap game. it is worse than cs:source in every single way. so to define that as the 'best game since...' is dumb. it doesn't even beat the previous game. and it wasn't meant to replace that game, either: it's a CONSOLE PORT. you talk about consoles ruining everything but then say CS:GO is a great game? do you even know what you're talking about? CS:GO was developed for console.
shootmania? who plays shootmania? it never left the ground. how do you define that as the 'greatest success' since quake? LOL. shootmania is a huge simplification of quake. quake involves rotating 7-8 weapons and multiple power-ups. quake involves total map control. what does shootmania involve? skipping around a few maps that are poorly designed firing TRON discs at one another. okay great replacement. have you heard of this thing called quakeLIVE? it's a browser version of quake that was released a few years ago... MORE popular and MORE skilled than shootmania.
to say those two games are the 'best' successors... lol... where have you been living these last few years?
the best- and most competitive- FPS games to be released since BF2 were call of duty 4 and team fortress 2. simple, indisputable fact. neither designed to be console games; neither designed as radical simplifications of what came before (unlike CS:GO and shootmania, respectively).
Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-04-06 07:58:27)