The Mercator map projection has been accused of being too western centric and has been replaced in many places. In most places in the U.S. it is still used especially at lower school levels.
The problem with the map is that it distorts the size of things in the north most notably Europe and Green land. Europe is depicted at the same size as Africa and South America though in reality Africa is four times the size of Europe and South America is about double. India is also a bigger in reality. Critics have made the Freudian argument that the size of things on a map affects the way people view the Earth politically and socially. Interesting argument. Many want these maps replaced with area accurate maps like this one
Many international organizations have taken the move to replace the maps and use area accurate ones. Do you think the argument is valid that the Mercator map distorts people's view of things or do you think that is a bunch of fluff from liberal professors?
The problem with the map is that it distorts the size of things in the north most notably Europe and Green land. Europe is depicted at the same size as Africa and South America though in reality Africa is four times the size of Europe and South America is about double. India is also a bigger in reality. Critics have made the Freudian argument that the size of things on a map affects the way people view the Earth politically and socially. Interesting argument. Many want these maps replaced with area accurate maps like this one
Many international organizations have taken the move to replace the maps and use area accurate ones. Do you think the argument is valid that the Mercator map distorts people's view of things or do you think that is a bunch of fluff from liberal professors?