This statement doesn't disprove my point. The iPhone happened then everything else followed in terms of marketable touch screen smartphones.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
HTC was building smart phones and touch response electronics like 10 years before the iphone existed. Samsung was a leader in developing smart phones and touch panels. All three of them were trying to innovate smart phones created by Nokia and others.
I'm actually starting to think I fractured my tail bone
yes and no. Look and feel, yeah I guess, but still no.
That doesn't mean they copied them. It just means Apple found a way to market something that was already being done.
Apple is good at creating markets. I really like my iPad. If it wasn't for them I wouldn't have considered getting a tablet
Did you take a spill while skiing?baggs wrote:
I'm actually starting to think I fractured my tail bone
My tablet is meh. I use it on the airplane and to stream music to my car stereo. That's pretty much it. Same with my phone- I loved my phone when I first got a smartphone. A bunch of games, messaging, all kinds of shit. Now its a gps and phone and very occasionally a browser. The wow factor goes away eventually.Macbeth wrote:
Apple is good at creating markets. I really like my iPad. If it wasn't for them I wouldn't have considered getting a tablet
They are good at opening markets and retooling industry thinking.
I don't want a Landcruiser, I want a Landraper - but Toyota don't make one.
Fuck Israel
I can remember having the HTC touch, and everyone thought it was so futuristic.
One of a few, it was the most innocuous crash of the three days actually, I hit a tree on the second day pretty hard and had no injury as a result.bugz wrote:
Did you take a spill while skiing?baggs wrote:
I'm actually starting to think I fractured my tail bone
you fell off a barstool apres ski, drunkard
I hit trees
you hit everything you horny bastard
Id hit on you if you let me
i've never went skiing.
fwp
Tu Stultus Es
Shouldn't it be UziqueTheFewer ?
As an English major I think he did that on purpose...
As an English major I think he did that on purpose...
...
Shouldn't there be some spaces between the words?AussieReaper wrote:
Shouldn't it be UziqueTheFewer ?
As an English major I think he did that on purpose...
As someone who is critiquing the grammar of an English major I think you overlooked this by accident.
yes, he doesn't want to look like BradT3hLeaderJaekus wrote:
Shouldn't there be some spaces between the words?AussieReaper wrote:
Shouldn't it be UziqueTheFewer ?
As an English major I think he did that on purpose...
As someone who is critiquing the grammar of an English major I think you overlooked this by accident.
No, it shouldn't.AussieReaper wrote:
Shouldn't it be UziqueTheFewer ?
As an English major I think he did that on purpose...
you can be a 'lesser' person.
however in terms of quantities and measurements, i.e. of objects in a multiplicity, there are always 'fewer' objects. to 'less' something is a mathematical function. this carries over in an analogous sense to describe someone's status/worth as being 'lesser', i.e. of being below some putative 'standard'.
aussie, as a retard, i shouldn't think you'd know better.
however in terms of quantities and measurements, i.e. of objects in a multiplicity, there are always 'fewer' objects. to 'less' something is a mathematical function. this carries over in an analogous sense to describe someone's status/worth as being 'lesser', i.e. of being below some putative 'standard'.
aussie, as a retard, i shouldn't think you'd know better.
i am going live for a broadcast tour thru an old hard-drive i found in about an hour.
may video-stream parts of it too.
just cause i'm bored. not necessarily mixed, or flashy. just a tour thru some of the musical bombs of my last 10 years.
join me.
http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
may video-stream parts of it too.
just cause i'm bored. not necessarily mixed, or flashy. just a tour thru some of the musical bombs of my last 10 years.
join me.
http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
can i have a big shout out
