yes, we don't have animals because of the second amendment. And there are definitely no bears in all of the US. And no such thing as hunting regulations.M.O.A.B wrote:
At a guess, I'd say yes. Or at least very close.-Whiteroom- wrote:
Just a thought, do you think bears would be hunted to extinction by everyone in America screaming that a ages old piece of paper told them it was their right?
...
?!KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
yes, we don't have animals because of the second amendment. And there are definitely no bears in all of the US. And no such thing as hunting regulations.M.O.A.B wrote:
At a guess, I'd say yes. Or at least very close.-Whiteroom- wrote:
Just a thought, do you think bears would be hunted to extinction by everyone in America screaming that a ages old piece of paper told them it was their right?
Ohhhh....dear.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
yes, we don't have animals because of the second amendment. And there are definitely no bears in all of the US. And no such thing as hunting regulations.M.O.A.B wrote:
At a guess, I'd say yes. Or at least very close.-Whiteroom- wrote:
Just a thought, do you think bears would be hunted to extinction by everyone in America screaming that a ages old piece of paper told them it was their right?
Did I miss something?
Looks like it.
It was a hypothetical. If the right to a pair of bear arms on the wall (as in the video) was in the constitution instead of guns, how many bears would be left. Since, you know, it would be a right to have the arms and given how close to heart the 2nd Amendment is, it would'nt have looked good for dem bears.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Did I miss something?
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2013-01-22 13:18:36)
I had to read back like 4 times before I figured it out, and after it was pointed out. I fail at comprehension.
it wasnt funny so dont worry about it
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
asdf
id post that but ken would delete my post-Whiteroom- wrote:
asdf
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
lol
Well it's a start at least.Mutantbear wrote:
id post that but ken would delete my post-Whiteroom- wrote:
asdf
Adams_BJ wrote:
but, can't you say that that is (potentially) a high rate of fire? So at least one of his points is sort of correct. Kinda.
Is that a pic of you firing one?-Sh1fty- wrote:
Fuck yeahCybargs wrote:
They should ban assault weapons, so only real men use M1 Garands. But wait, that's not the evil gun in the video game, it's grandaddy's good old rifle that killed nazi's and nips.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NelBNtNm8l0
Love the M1 Garand. 8 rounds of fight-stopping power, not too long of a gun, great balance in hands, good sights, looks beautiful, great for hunting, fantastic accuracy.
It's just...sexy.
Remember you posted that a while ago.
You know, I should go to a gun show and get one before they close that loophole.
Well, if that's your standard, pretty much everything except modern Olympic target rifles and pistols, small caliber flintlocks, and some shotguns fit the description. Do you really want to define the Arquebus as an "assault weapon?"M.O.A.B wrote:
To me an assault weapon is anything that was originally designed for combat, to be used in assaulting a target on the move...
Last edited by RAIMIUS (2013-01-22 22:25:33)
AussieReaper wrote:
Is that a pic of you firing one?-Sh1fty- wrote:
Fuck yeahCybargs wrote:
They should ban assault weapons, so only real men use M1 Garands. But wait, that's not the evil gun in the video game, it's grandaddy's good old rifle that killed nazi's and nips.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NelBNtNm8l0
Love the M1 Garand. 8 rounds of fight-stopping power, not too long of a gun, great balance in hands, good sights, looks beautiful, great for hunting, fantastic accuracy.
It's just...sexy.
Remember you posted that a while ago.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
You can purchase a gun legally in Arizona in a private sale (on the street) and not go through any background check whatsoever.Macbeth wrote:
You know, I should go to a gun show and get one before they close that loophole.
Oh and this is nice too -
http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-laws/arizona.aspxPURCHASE It is unlawful to sell or give to a minor, without written consent of the minor’s parent or legal guardian, a firearm or ammunition.
No state permit is required to purchase a shotgun, rifle, or handgun.
A note from mummy and an 8 year old can buy one!
Last edited by AussieReaper (2013-01-23 00:19:43)
legally!
Seems reasonable.
It's shit like that which tarnishes the reputation of responsible firearms owners. (warman and shifty do the same, tarnish reputations.)
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
Given how the ROF is hardly mind-boggling, no. I'm talking about weapons with cyclic rates in the hundreds on automatic. Semi-autos depend on how quick the shooter can pull the trigger, sure, but the shooter shouldn't have access to a large magazine, any type of specialised ammunition, or a weapon that fires a round designed to penetrate. There's a reason CT teams use MP5s in indoor hostage situations instead of rifles. Given how any civilian situation will be in the same kind of environment, a pistol is all that should be available to them, and one with a low-capacity magazine. You don't need something with 15, 20+ rounds for self-defence and if you do then you shouldn't be using the weapon, because you clearly lack the training and confidence in your ability to stop a threat with only a few rounds.RAIMIUS wrote:
Well, if that's your standard, pretty much everything except modern Olympic target rifles and pistols, small caliber flintlocks, and some shotguns fit the description. Do you really want to define the Arquebus as an "assault weapon?"M.O.A.B wrote:
To me an assault weapon is anything that was originally designed for combat, to be used in assaulting a target on the move...
If you want a rifle, keep it at a club.
Who are you to tell others what they need or what their desires should be?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Oh, I'm sorry. I wasn't aware the United States was currently a warzone comprable to Afghanistan where the average citizen needed an automatic weapon with say a hundred rounds of 7.62 API for when the convoys of evil government soldiers decked out in black come to take away their precious self-defence cannons. Grow the fuck up already.Jay wrote:
Who are you to tell others what they need or what their desires should be?
Your 2nd Amendment was written up for a militia, a purpose that doesn't exist anymore except in the hearts of the whackos who sit in compounds in the middle of nowhere. It was written at a time where you'd be lucky to get off two shots in a minute. It is a right that has been abused since its inception and these days it has little to do with the actual purpose, which is to defend yourself, and more to do with plinking a little metal sheet somewhere. What's wrong with that? Nothing. The problem lies in people taking these weapons back into suburbia where they're easily accessible to either an owner, relative of owner or a stranger off his nut, after which they end up blowing away a dozen or more people. But so long as you can go plinking a few lives are worth it I guess.