True datNooBesT wrote:
Steam does have a metric shit-ton of bad games. I don't know why anyone would think that being on Steam is somehow any indication on a game's quality. I doubt they would have given refunds if this shit wasn't extremely over-hyped.
It's not the fact it was just a shit game, it was surrounded by false promises and false advertising. Apparently it doesn't include almost everything on its steam description, the coding is horrendous. It charges you to buy the game and items in the game. Charges you to be able to respawn in an hour instead of four...
So the uproar isn't over it being a bad game per se, it's over the missing features and flat out lies...
And no I didn't buy it
So the uproar isn't over it being a bad game per se, it's over the missing features and flat out lies...
And no I didn't buy it
As said, I think being "bad" is different from scamming people.NooBesT wrote:
Steam does have a metric shit-ton of bad games. I don't know why anyone would think that being on Steam is somehow any indication on a game's quality. I doubt they would have given refunds if this shit wasn't extremely over-hyped.
The gameplay itself is shit IMO.
