Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5574

The long nineteenth century is Hobsbawm's description of the period of European history from 1789 to 1914 when European power grew the most and imploded fantastically. Starts with the First French Revolution and ends with WW1.

At the end of the cold war in 1991 the U.S. had the largest and most vibrant economy in the world and were militarily unchallenged. The other Empire that had picked up the scraps of Europe after the two world wars had just dissembled. 1918-1991/1939-1991.

What event do you think really signifies the end of the America's cold war prominence? If you think there is any.

I argued that if the country was in international decline that 9/11 was the start of it. The person I was talking with put the marker at the 2007 recession. His argument was that even though a lot of people died during 9/11 we were still making a lot of money as a country for the next 6 years and that is what really matters. Another person who interjected stated that the Iraq invasion in 2003 was the marker because it was the start of American draining itself in a war and that 9/11 was recoverable in a way that didn't require a war.

What do you think?!
Karbin
Member
+42|6283
I dont see just one "Thing" but 3.
9/11
Katrina
Iraq
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5347|London, England
I don't see any. Just paranoia.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
rdx-fx
...
+955|6580

Macbeth wrote:

What event do you think really signifies the end of the America's cold war prominence? If you think there is any.
To be trite, the end of the Cold War signified the end of American Cold War prominence.

Fall of the Berlin Wall, collapse of the Soviet Union.

Without the fear of Soviet tanks pouring through the Fulda Gap in West Germany, the relationship between Europe and the US fundamentally changed.

Between 1989 and 1991, everything changed.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6095|eXtreme to the maX
Not sure, the last war the US won - Vietnam?

Or the trade war with China - which is probably more serious.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|5988|...
ehm as far as I remember the concept of the long 19th century didn't center around European prosperity but rather the existing world order / power balance in this timeperiod. These changed dramatically following WW1, European 'power' didn't really implode until WW2 & after.
inane little opines
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|5988|...
^ considering the above it would also make more sense to draw the line at 1945/1946 because the global power balance shifted again after WW2. This gives you a time period of ~1945-1991. I'd draw a new line there for similar reasons. The age of US dominance only truly started when the Soviet Union collapsed and hasn't definitively ended yet.

I'd also like to add that many prefer to see the two world wars as one timeperiod now: 1914-1945. Yeah it overlaps with the long 19th century but that's not really an issue. Borders between timeperiods are often vague and not well defined anyway.

Last edited by Shocking (2012-12-30 09:54:46)

inane little opines
rdx-fx
...
+955|6580
Civil War was the US cultural implosion.

WW-1 and WW-2 was Europe's cultural implosion.

We're currently in the Middle East's cultural implosion.
rdx-fx
...
+955|6580

Dilbert_X wrote:

Not sure, the last war the US won - Vietnam?

Or the trade war with China - which is probably more serious.
Gulf War 1, 1991. Got Kuwait back.

Gulf War 2, 2003. Removed Saddam from power rather quickly.

Our military has historically been pretty good at warfare.
Our politicians have historically sucked ass at foreign policy, and figuring out what to do once the military has achieved military objectives.
They usually end up sitting in Washington DC with their thumbs up their asses, and telling the military "well, hell.. that was quick! You did the military part so well, why don't you try your hand at the foreign policy and political part tooI Imma gonna go play golf and run for reelection..."

Hint: Infantrymen are not hired for their brilliance at foreign policy...
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6095|eXtreme to the maX
Iraq is now more Islamic than before - unfriendly Shia are running the place whereas before it was Western-friendly Sunni - well done.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6679|Tampa Bay Florida
9/11 totally destroyed this country.  Now the only thing people are talking about is the economy but I clearly remember 10 years ago the mass panic which caused at least a substantial proportion of people to say things like "freedom isn't free" and "I've got nothing to hide so I don't care about the surveillance state".  Those attacks exposed us to the real world, while most other countries have been exposed to war and death and destruction 9/11 was a loud wake up call to the USA.  We are not insulated from the rest of the world, although we pretend to be.  And what was our response?  We are now even more heavily involved in the Middle East, we probably have special ops in every country from Pakistan all the way over to Morroco.  It's just a physically impossible task for us to micro manage every single backward fucked up government in that region.  Not to mention I believe it will backfire.

Meanwhile China rises from the East and if you've been paying attention recently they're saying they're going to test our resolve in Asia -- they'll start some shit with Japan over those islands to see if we stand with them or leave them in the dust.  This is all happening in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.  Hell, who knows, this still might turn into one. 

I see every problem America has faced in the last decade as being at least somewhat related to 9/11.  It wasn't the people who were killed, although that was horrible in itself, it was the constant 24/7/365 media paranoia which continues TO THIS DAY.  It was an act of psychological warfare.  Don't want the government to squeeze your nuts?  Terrorists!  Don't want the government to track literally everything you do electronically? (for 100 percent of the population btw) Terrorists!  The only cold comfort is that the economy is the greater distraction.  We are slowly coming out of the haze but we've still got a long ways to go.  And another attack would put us back at square one.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6095|eXtreme to the maX
Scaring themselves and being paranoid is what Americans, egged on by the media and govt excel at.
'The Islamic Menace' is just the latest incarnation. How much was spent and how many freedoms given away countering the imaginary 'Red Menace'?
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6679|Tampa Bay Florida

rdx-fx wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Not sure, the last war the US won - Vietnam?

Or the trade war with China - which is probably more serious.
Gulf War 1, 1991. Got Kuwait back.

Gulf War 2, 2003. Removed Saddam from power rather quickly.

Our military has historically been pretty good at warfare.
Our politicians have historically sucked ass at foreign policy, and figuring out what to do once the military has achieved military objectives.
They usually end up sitting in Washington DC with their thumbs up their asses, and telling the military "well, hell.. that was quick! You did the military part so well, why don't you try your hand at the foreign policy and political part tooI Imma gonna go play golf and run for reelection..."

Hint: Infantrymen are not hired for their brilliance at foreign policy...
All wars are political. 

Also, I'd disagree that we "won" the war in Iraq.  You can win every battle in the war but if you're political objectives are impossible you still lose.  Look at Vietnam.  Iraq is closer to Iran now than it was under Saddam, it is still a shithole dictatorship.  There is no "democracy".  It's also pretty close to another civil war now.

Fun fact, did you know Irans been using Iraqi airspace to supply the Syrians?  Such a victory!
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6141|what

Dilbert_X wrote:

Scaring themselves and being paranoid is what Americans, egged on by the media and govt excel at.
'The Islamic Menace' is just the latest incarnation. How much was spent and how many freedoms given away countering the imaginary 'Red Menace'?
The McCarthyism against Communism has simply been replaced by the Islamic equivilant.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5462|Ventura, California
Should the U.S. have pulled out of Iraq (pardon me, but what is the proper spelling for that country?) after having captured Saddam in 2004?
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6095|eXtreme to the maX
Capturing Saddam wasn't the objective remember?

It was capturing the WMDs, which are still buried in the desert - so America should go back now.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6095|eXtreme to the maX

AussieReaper wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Scaring themselves and being paranoid is what Americans, egged on by the media and govt excel at.
'The Islamic Menace' is just the latest incarnation. How much was spent and how many freedoms given away countering the imaginary 'Red Menace'?
The McCarthyism against Communism has simply been replaced by the Islamic equivilant.
https://i.imgur.com/RkAfg.jpg

No misguided paranoia there.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6434|The Land of Scott Walker
There you go again believing criminals obey gun laws.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6679|Tampa Bay Florida

-Sh1fty- wrote:

Should the U.S. have pulled out of Iraq (pardon me, but what is the proper spelling for that country?) after having captured Saddam in 2004?
We should have had a post-war strategy, which the Bush adminstration did not have.  They were outright delusional up until 2007 when they finally realized the war was being lost (badly) and they finally did something about it. 

Now, is it realistic to assume if Petraeus had been in charge in 2003 that things might have turned out differently?  Who knows.  There was a failure of political leadership.  If you're losing a war, you have to acknowledge it.  Something that Obama has unfortunately not done in Afghanistan.
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5462|Ventura, California
Chicago is the "Gun control capital of the U.S." and last year there were 500 deaths caused by gunshot. Gun control simply doesn't work.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6679|Tampa Bay Florida
Fuck you people.  Don't derail this perfectly good topic with gun control bullshit.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5347|London, England
It's a crappy topic. The economy could turn around tomorrow and you wouldn't even think about it. Country is fine. Debt-ridden and on the verge of financial collapse, but our place in the world hasn't changed... yet. We still have the biggest economy, and it's not even remotely close. We still have the biggest military, and again, it's not even remotely close. Topic is dumb. Sample size is small.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
A2TG2
Hazbeen
+67|4513|at your six
9/11

That was an event perpetrated by globalist to unleash a third world war that we are now in the middle of.
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5462|Ventura, California
Does it have to be one specific event? Such a dramatic change in the economic state of a county usually has many contributing factors.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4243

A2TG2 wrote:

9/11

That was an event perpetrated by globalist to unleash a third world war that we are now in the middle of.
american delusion. to call the iraq-afghan wars a 'third world war' shows just how inflated america's sense of conflict (and by extension, importance) really is. it is also a gross disrespect to those who served and died in the first two world wars to insist that a little romp around the desert against a bunch of tribal goatlords is anything near the deployment and devastation of a 'third world war'. or as if anything near as much is at stake (cries of neo-con "freedom" in today's case are merely propagandist and fear-mongering - arguably so in the first two world wars, too, if you're adopting the position of a cynic; but real territory and real power was at stake). this isn't even another vietnam, and vietnam was far from a fuckin' world war. feel free to call it that though to over-inflate the crisis and thus assuage your humiliation-in-failure. this is america trying to play toy empire in the sandbowl and failing, miserably, is all. 'the coalition' was more like a farcical neo-imperialist world police nee naw'ing onto the scene after a made-for-tv terrorist disaster; hardly the allies vs. the axis. the 'axis of evil' here - much like in the cold war - is largely imaginary and phantasmal in its threat. if there's anything that the expensive and painfully protracted "war on terror" has taught us over the last decade, it's that the "global terror network" is mostly a collective fiction... one penned ironically enough by CIA black propaganda, decades previous. you bought into your own self-concocted nightmare.

shifty, america's twin-blow (in domestic market and in world security) were both ticking time-bombs. it wasn't as if one day, suddenly and spontaneously, everything just unraveled. 9/11 was not an 'unprovoked' attack. it was america finally, after nearly half a century of neo-imperialist rule and foreign-policy intereference, finally reaping what it had sowed. ditto the financial crash. an elementary education in middle-east history and in 1980's->2000's economic policy will show you clearly enough why america was to become the single greatest locus for islamic hatred, and why a huge financial sector bubble was long due a prickly pinned pop-cum-detonation.

Last edited by aynrandroolz (2012-12-31 15:22:43)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard