unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6985|PNW

The key terms here are "superpower" and "sphere of influence." America is not an empire, 19th century or otherwise. You have to twist and warp the meaning of the word "empire" to apply it to the United States. If that's OK to do then let's just describe nations and governments based on our personal feelings rather than fact.

And no, Macbeth, Portugal was a colonial empire. They didn't just "empire around" with trade.
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|6989|Moscow, Russia
semantics...
/sigh
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6894|Disaster Free Zone
Lets be honest America has never been shy about twisting, warping and straight out changing the meaning of words. And then there's their atrocious spelling.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6319|eXtreme to the maX

Jay wrote:

Obesity rates have leveled off appear to have peaked at an unfeasibly high level and soda was never a major contributor gives about the highest sugar rush and diabetic impact imaginable.
Fixed.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2012-12-10 00:31:13)

Fuck Israel
globefish23
sophisticated slacker
+334|6537|Graz, Austria

Jay wrote:

trillions of tax dollars
Your talking about 1012 tax dollars there, aren't you?
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5571|London, England

globefish23 wrote:

Jay wrote:

trillions of tax dollars
Your talking about 1012 tax dollars there, aren't you?
Yep. Our published military budget last year was $6.8x1011. Doesn't include things like black ops funding, or cia operations etc.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6929

Jay wrote:

globefish23 wrote:

Jay wrote:

trillions of tax dollars
Your talking about 1012 tax dollars there, aren't you?
Yep. Our published military budget last year was $6.8x1011. Doesn't include things like black ops funding, or cia operations etc.
Don't black ops fund itself with cocaine money
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6903|Tampa Bay Florida

AussieReaper wrote:

Your past success of Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq indicate this would be over in minutes.
The only reason we haven't already pummeled them into the ground is because of China.  They wouldn't last long.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6366|what

Spearhead wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Your past success of Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq indicate this would be over in minutes.
The only reason we haven't already pummeled them into the ground is because of China.  They wouldn't last long.
https://i.imgur.com/ImLH8.gif


Does China have anything to do with Afghanistan and Iraq I/II?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6903|Tampa Bay Florida

AussieReaper wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Your past success of Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq indicate this would be over in minutes.
The only reason we haven't already pummeled them into the ground is because of China.  They wouldn't last long.



Does China have anything to do with Afghanistan and Iraq I/II?
If you've read any of my posts the last 6 + years you know I'm no neocon or hawk.  My point still stands.  North Korea, without the direct intervention from China, wouldn't last very long.  Notice how I'm purposely avoiding the question of "what happens afterwards".
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6903|Tampa Bay Florida
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/10/us/intell … ?hpt=hp_t4

(CNN) -- The United States is likely to remain the leading world power in 2030 but won't hold the kind of sway it did in the past century, according to a new study by the U.S. intelligence community.

Washington will most likely hold its status as "first among equals" two decades from now, buoyed not only by military strength but by economic and diplomatic power. That's one of the conclusions of "Alternative Worlds," released Monday by the National Intelligence Council.

China and other rising powers may be "ambivalent and even resentful" of American leadership, but they're more interested in holding positions of influence in organizations such as the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund than assuming that role, the report found.
"Nevertheless, with the rapid rise of other countries, the 'unipolar moment' is over, and 'Pax Americana' -- the era of American ascendancy in international politics that began in 1945 -- is fast winding down," the report states.

Monday's 166-page report is the fifth in the "Global Trends 2030" series by the council, an arm of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
It doesn't make specific predictions, but says that the world is at a "critical juncture" in which technology is advancing, competition for resources is growing and a middle class is emerging in countries around the world.

"Our effort is to encourage decision makers -- whether in government or outside -- to think and plan for the long term so that negative futures do not occur and positive ones have a better chance of unfolding," council Chairman Christopher Kojm wrote in the report's preface.

The report lays out a series of possible futures, both optimistic and pessimistic, from a world in which globalization has stalled and the risk of war has gone up to one in which collaboration between Washington and Beijing produces a rapid increase in worldwide prosperity.

Technological advances will give individuals more freedom, but also have the potential to provide small groups with the kind of destructive capabilities now available only to nations.

"With more widespread access to lethal and destructive technologies, individuals who are experts in such key areas as cyber systems might sell their services to the highest bidder," Kojm said during a briefing on the report. "Terrorists might focus less on mass casualties and more on causing widespread economic and financial disruptions."

Economic power is likely to shift away from the United States and Europe to China, India and Southeast Asian countries, and Africa will see an urban boom as people move to cities at a faster rate, the report concludes. But those developments will add pressure to deal with environmental issues such as more frequent or severe droughts and the projected rise in sea levels due to a warming climate.

"Under most scenarios -- except the most dire -- significant strides in reducing extreme poverty will be achieved by 2030," the report notes. The numbers of people living in poverty is likely to drop sharply in East and South Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, with sub-Saharan Africa lagging behind.

Kojm said, "economic growth, the rise of the global middle class, greater educational obtainment and better health care mean -- for the first time in human history -- the majority of the world's population will no longer be impoverished."

But perhaps the biggest question mark in the report is the Middle East.

The region "will be a very different place" in 2030, the authors conclude. "But the possibilities run a wide gamut from fragile growth and development to chronic instability and potential regional conflicts."

The youth boom that has driven the Arab Spring revolts will give way to an aging population, while shifts in energy consumption may force oil-rich Middle Eastern economies to find new sources of income.

The growth of middle classes will increase demand for political and social change, but that could be a mixed blessing: "Historically, the rise of middle classes has led to populism and dictatorships as well as pressures for greater democracy," the authors noted.

Meanwhile, that global growth "disguises growing pressures on the middle class in Western economies," including international competition for higher-skilled jobs.

The growing middle class will also increase demand for water and food by more than 35% over the next couple of decades the report indicates. Advancements in key technologies such as genetically modified crops, precision agriculture and water irrigation techniques should for the most part prevent scarcity.

An increase in the earning power, education and political clout of women "will be a key driver of success for many countries," with gender gaps closing fastest in East Asia and Latin America, the report found.

And India is likely to be in the same position in 2030 that China is today, it concludes.

"India's rate of economic growth is likely to rise while China's slows," the authors found. China's 8%-10% growth "will probably be a distant memory by 2030," it notes. And India's economic advantage over regional nuclear rival Pakistan is likely to grow, roughly doubling the comparative size of its economy

Last edited by Spearhead (2012-12-10 13:50:07)

Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5571|London, England
Dude, they've been brainwashed for the past seventy years and have 1.1 million people in their army. They would roll over South Korea in a matter of days with the 2nd Infantry Division being nothing more than a speed bump on the way to the sea. The RoK army doesn't have nearly the same morale and would be crushed. Unless you plan on nuking them into oblivion, there's no real win there. If we did manage to launch another McArthur style re-invasion, they would hole up in the mountains like the Japanese did on overrun islands and fight with the same level of devotion. A fight with North Korea is like a nightmare that only Wes Craven or Tim Burton could dream up. Oh, and they have nukes.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6985|PNW

And then what?
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5571|London, England

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

And then what?
Nothing. It would be completely fucking pointless.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6985|PNW

Which is probably why NK hasn't invaded SK.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6903|Tampa Bay Florida

Jay wrote:

Dude, they've been brainwashed for the past seventy years and have 1.1 million people in their army. They would roll over South Korea in a matter of days with the 2nd Infantry Division being nothing more than a speed bump on the way to the sea. The RoK army doesn't have nearly the same morale and would be crushed. Unless you plan on nuking them into oblivion, there's no real win there. If we did manage to launch another McArthur style re-invasion, they would hole up in the mountains like the Japanese did on overrun islands and fight with the same level of devotion. A fight with North Korea is like a nightmare that only Wes Craven or Tim Burton could dream up. Oh, and they have nukes.
Then maybe I should be a film director!  God, use some imagination man.  This isnt the 1950's anymore.  You really think they'd be that much better than the Iraqi's?

I for one think the effectiveness of brainwashing might be a little bit overblown.  Seeing as how the country is basically a dead zone as far as freedom of the press is concerned.  How long would they be able to fight when we obliterate they're already-fragile food supply?

Last edited by Spearhead (2012-12-10 14:15:19)

Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5392|Sydney
Because the US economy is so prepared to deploy another 150,000 troops into another country for absolutely no reason at all.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6903|Tampa Bay Florida

Jaekus wrote:

Because the US economy is so prepared to deploy another 150,000 troops into another country for absolutely no reason at all.
You guys seriously need to simmer down a bit.  I'm not advocating we actually do it. 

Although if anyone in the world deserved to be invaded, PRE-2003 IRAQ INVASION, it was those guys.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5392|Sydney
I point out a fact and get told to simmer down.

lol wat
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6903|Tampa Bay Florida
I'm not used to getting gangbanged on this forum as much as Jay is, okay?  It was a boring day and I needed something to hypothesize about.
globefish23
sophisticated slacker
+334|6537|Graz, Austria

Spearhead wrote:

This isnt the 1950's anymore.
This.
Back then North Korea was much closer to the USA weapon technology-wise.
They also were massively backed up by the Soviet Union as their puppet state.
The USA already had a few nuclear weapons, but those were dropped from bombers.

All this has changed dramatically in the past 60 years.
The US has top-notch missile and UAV technology, a huge navy with carriers, submarines, fighter jets and cruise missiles.
North Korea on the other hand still uses weapons technology from what - the 1970s?
And their nuclear weapons program is approximately at the post Nagasaki state, if at all.
Not to speak of their missiles - I bet the Hamas in Gaza has more reliable and farther reaching ones.

IMO, North Korea are merely China's evil Jack-in-the-box, who regularly pops out and does something silly or crazy to piss off anyone else.
That way, China can distract from their flaws while pointing fingers at the only remaining WWII-style Stalinist regime.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5571|London, England
More than 200 school districts across California are taking a second look at the high price of the debt they've taken on using risky financial arrangements. Collectively, the districts have borrowed billions in loans that defer payments for years — leaving many districts owing far more than they borrowed.

In 2010, officials at the West Contra Costa School District, just east of San Francisco, were in a bind. The district needed $2.5 million to help secure a federally subsidized $25 million loan to build a badly needed elementary school.

Charles Ramsey, president of the school board, says he needed that $2.5 million upfront, but the district didn't have it.

"We'd be foolish not to take advantage of getting $25 million" when the district had to spend just $2.5 million to get it, Ramsey says. "The only way we could do it was with a [capital appreciation bond]."

Those bonds, known as CABs, are unlike typical bonds, where a school district is required to make immediate and regular payments. Instead, CABs allow districts to defer payments well into the future — by which time lots of interest has accrued.

In the West Contra Costa Schools' case, that $2.5 million bond will cost the district a whopping $34 million to repay.
http://www.npr.org/2012/12/07/166745290 … llion-loan

I can't believe anyone still wants to live in California. The place is a financial mess from top to bottom.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5799

The weather is nice. Would totally live out there if I could.
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5392|Sydney
I liked the couple weeks I spent in CA. Nice place.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5571|London, England
Nice place to visit, but would never want to live there. Taxes are going to have to triple if they ever want to balance their budget. Dems have complete control of the state government so it's not as if spending cuts are forthcoming.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard