Not only that, but the purpose of a justice system is also to rehabilitate when possible. It seems to be an anger issue, not a psychopathic desire to torture children. Even if it were, sentencing someone to rot for their lifetime is still not justified. As Mac has said, had she murdered the child there would be less consequence.Macbeth wrote:
Fuck you and everyone else who thinks that is fair sentence. 99 years is excessive as hell.AussieReaper wrote:
"On Sept. 7, 2011, you savagely beat your child to the edge of death," Mitchell said. "For this you must be punished."
The beating left Jocelyn Cedillo in a coma for a couple of days.
Escalona's other children told authorities their mother attacked Jocelyn due to potty training problems. Police say she kicked her daughter in the stomach, beat her with a milk jug, then stuck her hands to an apartment wall with an adhesive commonly known as Super Glue.
Deserves every single day she was sentenced to.
She would have gotten less time if she had raped the kid or murdered her. This sentence helps no one but boy does it satisfy people's urge for vengeance.
The welfare of the victim should be taken into consideration when sentencing right? Which is better for the child than? Having her mother in prison forever or preventing the mother from seeing the child until she is 18 while the mother has to pay child support?
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families
