Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

DrunkFace wrote:

Jay wrote:

[I can walk down the main street in my own town and eat Italian, Mexican, Irish, Korean, Thai, French, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, Jewish, and Greek, and those are only the restaurants I can think of off the top of my head.
That is not unique nor special.
It is when they're actually staffed by people of those ethnicities.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6899|Disaster Free Zone

Jay wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

Jay wrote:

[I can walk down the main street in my own town and eat Italian, Mexican, Irish, Korean, Thai, French, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, Jewish, and Greek, and those are only the restaurants I can think of off the top of my head.
That is not unique nor special.
It is when they're actually staffed by people of those ethnicities.
Nope.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6850|949

You'll find that in really any major city.

I think the immigration debate is interesting.  You don't have nationalist parties in the US that gain the magnitude of media coverage and sympathy like the ones in Europe.  France is notoriously racist.  Italy is notoriously racist.  In England, on one hand you can't incite racial hatred over twitter but parties like the BNP can exist and even find sympathy.  Black sports stars in the US don't get bananas thrown at them when they take the field.  These are not connected instances but to think one society is better than the other is not only an impossible and ridiculous idea, it's just not true.

Uzi, I think you're mistaken to say the US is more caught up in race, background, etc.  We all have racial and class stratification.  I've heard people bitch about the islamification of Europe (especially Germany and Belgium), Irish and English people bitch about the Poles taking all the jobs, etc.  If anything, I would say the US still has much more institutional racism than Europe at large, but it seems like Europeans are more socially racist.  It's a general statement, but if I were to make a compare / contrast decision I think that's it.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4472
First off, to Galt, I think it shows a shocking level of naivety and inexperience if you think that ethnic areas of major cities "staffed by ethnic workers" is a unique thing. I can find streets like that in my local provincial town.

I don't think far-right groups in the UK "find sympathy" of any "magnitude". They are allowed to exist, they are represented in the media (not altogether unfairly and dismissively, according to principles of good journalism), and they are allowed to have a platform, yes. But this is because European democracy is much wider and more varied than American democracy; our politics runs the whole spectral gamut from far-right to far-left, and all has a healthy following. In America you're all centrist and you end up queefing over a dude's smile after a press conference, or something. Even though far-right groups are a necessary evil, I'd say our political scene is much more 'healthy', much more thriving, and much more democratic, really. There is a party for everyone. The fact that certain parties of right/left persuasion find a platform and are represented in part of the media's lionshare is no bad thing, necessarily. It's better than having two parties and you have to eat shit and be disenfranchised if you feel any other way. In Europe, 'communist', 'leftist', 'progressivist', 'liberal', and even 'fascist' have not been turned into instant pejoratives (though I admit you'll be hard-pressed to find anyone nowadays credibly talking about fascism). In America, these terms are insta-ejected from speakers' mouths as a form of political retort and dismissal. Is this a healthy politics? I'd rather keep around our bonk-eyed BNP members with their tiny rallies (which gain far more media attention than any real political energy). I'd say it's the same in France's far-right (with the odious Le Pen dynasty), the same in Scandinavia (look at their response to Breivik; total pluralism and encouragement of inclusivity; shutting out of right-wing rhetoric, etc). Yes, in Europe right-wing movements still exist; we tolerate them. During economic recession and times of political disillusionment with mainstream politics, they may even grow. I can't actually say it's altogether a bad thing. I think it reflects a healthy democracy. Better than having only two parties to choose from, both of whom are bought out by big corps and lobby groups. No?

Similarly I would say banana-throwing incidents and football racism is more in the province of Eastern-Europe / ex-Soviet bloc. In terms of Europe's cultural make-up, this really is a separate bloc; the ex-Soviet states and former Iron Curtain countries have a distinctly different culture and outlook. Although skin colour isn't any different, the culture really is like comparing the US to Mexico, in that regard. Their economics are often not far behind the Mexico comparison, either. However, complaints about Eastern European integration and migration to Western Europe are very often over-stated. We do not have huge political debates and news-stories like you do in the US about Mexico and the Latin invasion. Even though the acceptance to the EU of several Eastern states saw absolutely massive influxes of new migrants, it still never became a major political point of election-debate. The same goes towards your talk of Islamophobia: the same socio-economic groups in every country tend to use Poles/Islamics as their scapegoat: the blue-working class (and often, now, unemployed). I think this is a universal tendency - the turn towards far-right politics and xenophobia during economic hard-times. You get it in Japan, Australia, the US, Europe... everywhere. American's are not exempt from complaining about immigrants "taking our jobs", either, and that is essentially the crux of all complaints about Poles and Muslims (with Muslims modified to a "they claim our benefits!" type complaint).

In general I would also say that institutional racism is far worse than the xenophobia or small-mindedness of the European working-class. Institutional racism is the stuff that does real harm to people and really hampers their lives - not some white-van driver picking up a tabloid and spitting some bile about Polish plumbers. Look at your schools, your colleges, your prisons, your professions. I think Europe does a much better job on that front.

Last edited by aynrandroolz (2012-09-19 12:06:43)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6850|949

I agree with pretty much everything you've said - and that speaks to my point that you can't really argue one is more liberal in regards to race and immigration than the other.  We all have our shortcomings - and it's stupid to argue one is better than the other in that regard.
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5692|Ventura, California

13urnzz wrote:

Wow, you traded all that for a ride to Ventura . . .
It was done. I got my free year, couldn't afford any more. That just happened to be around the time my parents decided to divorce so that ended up being convenient so I could just move here. There was nothing left for me there.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Frank Reynolds
Member
+65|4547

DrunkFace wrote:

Jay wrote:

[I can walk down the main street in my own town and eat Italian, Mexican, Irish, Korean, Thai, French, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, Jewish, and Greek, and those are only the restaurants I can think of off the top of my head.
That is not unique nor special.
aussie lands racist immigration policy is very special
What are you looking at dicknose
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4472

Frank Reynolds wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

Jay wrote:

[I can walk down the main street in my own town and eat Italian, Mexican, Irish, Korean, Thai, French, Vietnamese, Chinese, Japanese, Jewish, and Greek, and those are only the restaurants I can think of off the top of my head.
That is not unique nor special.
aussie lands racist immigration policy is very special
where you have to bring a skill or contribution to the society? yes, extremely racist. discriminating on skill and qualifications. racist

in the uk you have to take a citizenship test now as well, to prove you know enough about the uk and our language/culture. racist? or commonsense? it all helps better integration. not racism. what's racist is letting people with no skills and no clue come to your (alien) country, and then settle in ghettos where they never integrate or involve themselves. that leads to more discrimination than the former scenario.
Frank Reynolds
Member
+65|4547

aynrandroolz wrote:

Frank Reynolds wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

That is not unique nor special.
aussie lands racist immigration policy is very special
where you have to bring a skill or contribution to the society? yes, extremely racist. discriminating on skill and qualifications. racist

in the uk you have to take a citizenship test now as well, to prove you know enough about the uk and our language/culture. racist? or commonsense? it all helps better integration. not racism. what's racist is letting people with no skills and no clue come to your (alien) country, and then settle in ghettos where they never integrate or involve themselves. that leads to more discrimination than the former scenario.
right.

so you have a few africans with no skill trying to escape civil war with no education  - go away

oh hi mr white person with a degree and a middle/upper class upbringing given every advantage in the world to succeed - welcome




ok not racist.  got another term for it?  it aint right no matter how you word it.
What are you looking at dicknose
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4472
lol you have no fucking clue. a REFUGEE from a war enters a country under quite different circumstances (and with quite different civil rights) to a person choosing to emigrate for a new life/career change. if you want to come into a country, you need a visa, you have to prove you have a skillset and will bring a benefit to the economy. if you are a REFUGEE then obviously you are going to get let in and processed via a different way.

they are completely different things. also the 'entry test' is basic knowledge of english language and culture. it's not "people with top degrees only, we want to make a white paradise". 80% of incoming immigrants to the uk are most definitely not highly-educated westerners. and we accept them. please get a clue.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6718|so randum
not to dogpile, but that describes streets in average towns in north england, let alone london.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Frank Reynolds
Member
+65|4547

aynrandroolz wrote:

lol you have no fucking clue. a REFUGEE from a war enters a country under quite different circumstances (and with quite different civil rights) to a person choosing to emigrate for a new life/career change. if you want to come into a country, you need a visa, you have to prove you have a skillset and will bring a benefit to the economy. if you are a REFUGEE then obviously you are going to get let in and processed via a different way.

they are completely different things. also the 'entry test' is basic knowledge of english language and culture. it's not "people with top degrees only, we want to make a white paradise". 80% of incoming immigrants to the uk are most definitely not highly-educated westerners. and we accept them. please get a clue.
jesus christ i didnt mention refugee status did i?  if i wanted to say refugee i would have said it.  so dont tell me i have no fucking clue.  you dont have to be such a major wank rag in every reply.

ok...so lets adjust my previous post and say some central african wanting a better life with no education or skills.  sorry sir go back to your mine and get me diamonds or minerals for my ipad?




and once again i did not mention the UK so why you keep rambling on about it is not making any sense.  i dont give a flying fuck what your policy is.  i dont care about the UK, not in the least bit.  well except for your future queens boobies. ( no i dont know if she can actually be queen nor do i care)
What are you looking at dicknose
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4472
people from central africa have as much chance of getting into the UK as any other country. what's his chances of getting into the USA? you have to pass a basic citizenship test here. if he can speak english and point out london on a map, he's probably gonna be allowed in. there are a lot of african communities in london and other parts of britain already. can you say the same for america? i dunno why you're accusing the UK and australia of border racism when we just use basic visa's and common sense.

how is america any better than australia for letting in people with no skills? i'm confused. where are you taking a highground here?

also kate middleton's tits are awful. you must have some low standards if you think those things are anything worth talking about.

Last edited by aynrandroolz (2012-09-19 13:29:33)

13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6715

aynrandroolz wrote:

how is america any better than australia for letting in people with no skills?
we're not. the only skill you need is either fence climbing, swimming, or running.

https://i.imgur.com/SoB4W.jpg
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6850|949

should we not allow people in unless they are highly qualified with a professional degree? That seems stupid.  You should be able to go anywhere in the world you want, regardless your job skills.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5576|London, England

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

should we not allow people in unless they are highly qualified with a professional degree? That seems stupid.  You should be able to go anywhere in the world you want, regardless your job skills.
Undermines welfare states
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6217|...
Who gave you that idea? The arguments for strict immigration policy rarely concern themselves with 'protecting the welfare state'. EU citizens can live and work anywhere they want within the union, for everyone else there are differing immigration policies depending on the country within the union you're trying to migrate to. I really don't know all of these laws because there are too many to list, but I do know that, for instance, Spain has very relaxed immigration laws and these have been in place for years now to try and stimulate their economy. Though 'relaxed immigration laws' don't make immigration a succes story, integration is much more important. Scandinavian countries usually score very well on the 'integrating immigrants' part of the equation. Just because you allow the most people in your country of any nation doesn't mean it's a good thing - and why should it be? Open borders =/= succesful immigration & cohesive multicultural society.
inane little opines
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6850|949

what do you consider 'successful immigration'?  How do you quantify it?
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6217|...
This sums it up quite nicely;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatn … rants.html

The study, published by the British Council and the Migration Policy Group, ranked 31 countries in Europe and North America on their policies towards integrating immigrants.

Using a variety of different critiera, including employment opportunities, access to education and anti-discrimination legislation, experts from all around the world scored countries on how well their policies fitted with international standards upheld by the EU.

After Sweden, the four highest-ranking countries were Portugal, Canada, Finland and the Netherlands, while the bottom five were Lithuania, Malta, Slovakia, Cyprus and Latvia. The UK was ranked in 12th position, equal with Germany, while the US was ranked in 9th place. Overall, within Europe and North America there was significant disparity, with Sweden being given a score of 83 points out of 100 for its policies, and Lithuania only 31 points.
inane little opines
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5396|Sydney

Frank Reynolds wrote:

aynrandroolz wrote:

Frank Reynolds wrote:

aussie lands racist immigration policy is very special
where you have to bring a skill or contribution to the society? yes, extremely racist. discriminating on skill and qualifications. racist

in the uk you have to take a citizenship test now as well, to prove you know enough about the uk and our language/culture. racist? or commonsense? it all helps better integration. not racism. what's racist is letting people with no skills and no clue come to your (alien) country, and then settle in ghettos where they never integrate or involve themselves. that leads to more discrimination than the former scenario.
right.

so you have a few africans with no skill trying to escape civil war with no education  - go away

oh hi mr white person with a degree and a middle/upper class upbringing given every advantage in the world to succeed - welcome




ok not racist.  got another term for it?  it aint right no matter how you word it.
Here in Brisbane there is almost an entire suburb of African people who are refugees, and the number continues to grow.

About nine years ago, when I was living in Tasmania, I met a bunch of Sudanese guys at a party in my own house (my housemate became friends with them) who had were also refugees after being forced into the army at the age of 14 and by the age of 16 one of them had killed 17 people in civil war.

So kindly take your ignorance and fuck off.

Last edited by Jaekus (2012-09-19 16:17:45)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6850|949

so successful immigration = integration?
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,978|6850|949

Jaekus wrote:

Frank Reynolds wrote:

aynrandroolz wrote:


where you have to bring a skill or contribution to the society? yes, extremely racist. discriminating on skill and qualifications. racist

in the uk you have to take a citizenship test now as well, to prove you know enough about the uk and our language/culture. racist? or commonsense? it all helps better integration. not racism. what's racist is letting people with no skills and no clue come to your (alien) country, and then settle in ghettos where they never integrate or involve themselves. that leads to more discrimination than the former scenario.
right.

so you have a few africans with no skill trying to escape civil war with no education  - go away

oh hi mr white person with a degree and a middle/upper class upbringing given every advantage in the world to succeed - welcome




ok not racist.  got another term for it?  it aint right no matter how you word it.
Here in Brisbane there is almost an entire suburb of African people who are refugees, and the number continues to grow.

About nine years ago, when I was living in Tasmania, I met a bunch of Sudanese guys at a party in my own house (my housemate became friends with them) who had were also refugees after being forced into the army at the age of 14 and by the age of 16 one of them had killed 17 people in civil war.

So kindly take your ignorance and fuck off.
you missed the next post where he said he wasn't talking about refugees?
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6934

Frank Reynolds wrote:

aynrandroolz wrote:

Frank Reynolds wrote:


aussie lands racist immigration policy is very special
where you have to bring a skill or contribution to the society? yes, extremely racist. discriminating on skill and qualifications. racist

in the uk you have to take a citizenship test now as well, to prove you know enough about the uk and our language/culture. racist? or commonsense? it all helps better integration. not racism. what's racist is letting people with no skills and no clue come to your (alien) country, and then settle in ghettos where they never integrate or involve themselves. that leads to more discrimination than the former scenario.
right.

so you have a few africans with no skill trying to escape civil war with no education  - go away

oh hi mr white person with a degree and a middle/upper class upbringing given every advantage in the world to succeed - welcome




ok not racist.  got another term for it?  it aint right no matter how you word it.


0:40 seconds.

Yeah our immigration process isn't racist at all!

Not saying it's not getting better, but we still have a lot of screening process that is quite racist. Euro's have a much much easier time coming here than people from SE Asia, despite qualifications and language capabilities.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6324|eXtreme to the maX

Jay wrote:

I didn't know gay marriage was legal in the UK or that all hereditary rule had been abolished
So gay marriage is legal across the US?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_m … ted_States
Nope

Does Britain have a law preventing the government from recognising it, like this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Marriage_Act ?
Nope.

So in that sense Britain is ahead, or at least moving less backasswards into the future.
I'll bet Britain ends up with gay marriage well before its on the US Federal statute though, then again I'm not sure why you ex-military guys keep bringing it up.

As for your second point, yup hereditary rule was well on the way to being abolished before the first British settlers started heading for the Western colonies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_England

Over the centuries, the English Parliament progressively limited the power of the English monarchy which arguably culminated in the English Civil War and the trial and execution of Charles I in 1649. After the restoration of the monarchy under Charles II, the supremacy of parliament was a settled principle and all future English and later British sovereigns were restricted to the role of constitutional monarchs with limited executive authority.
A constitutional monarchy being a neat way of avoiding the tedium and irrelevance of the unnecessary layer of govt which a Presidency fulfils.

Got anything else?

The only thing I can think of is the US was few decades ahead of South Africa, which isn't in Europe, in racial laws. Apart from that its a 200yr timewarp supervised by Christian mullahs which is generally going backwards.
Fuck Israel
Frank Reynolds
Member
+65|4547

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

you missed the next post where he said he wasn't talking about refugees?
i never talked about it period because refugee status is not really immigration policy but it helps other people toss insults around so let them be

Last edited by Frank Reynolds (2012-09-20 08:37:00)

What are you looking at dicknose

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard