13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6495

Superior Mind wrote:

State University of New York


ON TOPIC:

Who should I vote for and why?
you should vote for whom your parents tell you to vote for, that's why.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5356|London, England
Vote green party or anything really. It's not like our votes matter anyway Sup, NY always votes Democrat
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|6690
Ralph Nader it is.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5356|London, England

Superior Mind wrote:

Ralph Nader it is.
He retired. Now Jill Stein is running in his place.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5176|Sydney
A mate served 5.5 months in Afghanistan. When he came back a couple months ago the payout was enough to put the deposit down on a house for he and his wife.

I'd say serving in a place like that warrants the money he earned.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6714

Jaekus wrote:

A mate served 5.5 months in Afghanistan. When he came back a couple months ago the payout was enough to put the deposit down on a house for he and his wife.

I'd say serving in a place like that warrants the money he earned.
At least Jay actually deployed and got paid to get shot at. POGs get shot like everybody else.

I know Aus gov pays something crazy like 150k per 6month deployment to the 'stan. American gov pays you dick compared to that lol.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5356|London, England

Cybargs wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

A mate served 5.5 months in Afghanistan. When he came back a couple months ago the payout was enough to put the deposit down on a house for he and his wife.

I'd say serving in a place like that warrants the money he earned.
At least Jay actually deployed and got paid to get shot at. POGs get shot like everybody else.

I know Aus gov pays something crazy like 150k per 6month deployment to the 'stan. American gov pays you dick compared to that lol.
150k for a six month deployment? Holy fucking shit. All I got was an extra $800/month and tax free status.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6714

Jay wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

A mate served 5.5 months in Afghanistan. When he came back a couple months ago the payout was enough to put the deposit down on a house for he and his wife.

I'd say serving in a place like that warrants the money he earned.
At least Jay actually deployed and got paid to get shot at. POGs get shot like everybody else.

I know Aus gov pays something crazy like 150k per 6month deployment to the 'stan. American gov pays you dick compared to that lol.
150k for a six month deployment? Holy fucking shit. All I got was an extra $800/month and tax free status.
Back in the hey day, but now its 200 dollars per day + other allowances they chuck at you, and you get more for having wife and kids.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6672|Canberra, AUS
man this "debate" is fascinating.

apparently obama out-raised romney last month. had a good chuckle at that.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6103|eXtreme to the maX
I think I might join the Navy, submariners get $200k/yr min tax free and only deploy ~3mths/yr (I think thats how long the batteries last).
I did a tour of one of the subs and while most hatches and corridors were a severe squeeze - so many lost buttons but I'm already transitioning to velcro on everything - I think its something I could do.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|6690
The "batteries" last for decades on our subs. They only stop to get more food and rotate the crew.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6714

Dilbert_X wrote:

I think I might join the Navy, submariners get $200k/yr min tax free and only deploy ~3mths/yr (I think thats how long the batteries last).
I did a tour of one of the subs and while most hatches and corridors were a severe squeeze - so many lost buttons but I'm already transitioning to velcro on everything - I think its something I could do.
There's a reason why submarine morale is so low compared to rest of Navy... Collins class are pretty dodgy.

Sup: yeah we can't go nuclear coz of hippies
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5176|Sydney

Cybargs wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

A mate served 5.5 months in Afghanistan. When he came back a couple months ago the payout was enough to put the deposit down on a house for he and his wife.

I'd say serving in a place like that warrants the money he earned.
At least Jay actually deployed and got paid to get shot at. POGs get shot like everybody else.

I know Aus gov pays something crazy like 150k per 6month deployment to the 'stan. American gov pays you dick compared to that lol.
He said during his deployment it was pretty relaxed most of the time. They were working with the local community and he didn't see any combat. There was a Taliban rocket strike towards the end of his time there but it fell well short of his base.
13urnzz
Banned
+5,830|6495

successful derail is successful
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4252
http://nplusonemag.com/politicopsychopathology

https://nplusonemag.com/images/txp/image.php?width=625&quality=95&image=https://nplusonemag.com/images/txp/849.jpg

According to Adorno, in psychoanalysis only the exaggerations are true. If you wished to characterize the Democrats and the Republicans in terms of true exaggerations, you might say that the Republicans have become the Party of Psychosis while the Democrats have become the Party of Neurosis. The Republicans are psychotic because they have lost contact with reality, and orient their behavior not toward realities but toward fantasies. The Democrats are neurotic because they are aim-inhibited, as an old-fashioned shrink might say: their anxieties, hang-ups, and insecurities mean that they can’t attain satisfaction, since in a basic way they won’t even allow themselves to know what they want.

Many features of the Republican psychosis are well known: Global warming isn’t caused by humans; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are responsible for the financial crisis; the President, who may be a foreign-born anticolonialist undermining America at the bidding of his father’s ghost, has eliminated the work requirement for welfare; and so on. There’s never much point in talking to psychotics, though we can speculate about the particular delusions they exhibit. Most of us probably subscribe to an interpretation of the Grand Old Psychosis (GOP) that goes something like this: The trauma of American decline as experienced by white people, older people, and men—and above all older white men—has caused a psychic break producing a classic paranoid delusion, in which that segment of the population which through its race, culture, and creed embodies the American virtues responsible for the country’s former greatness is being attacked by a composite monster (dark-skinned, sexually deviant, non-Christian, and anticapitalist) bent on stigmatizing family as patriarchy, religion as ignorance, and free enterprise as predation. Here as in many cases of persecution delusion we might suspect the displacement onto others of a terrible guilt, in this instance surrounding war, racism, climate destruction, and so on. This interpretation of Republican loss of contact with reality is cartoonish and speculative but, in my considered opinion as a democratic ecosocialist and citizen–clinician, probably true as far as it goes.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6769|PNW

Being a suspected major contributor is not the same thing as being the cause. Dramatic language doesn't help convince skeptics, especially when they dig up contrarian articles citing things like ocean emissions, CO2 not always having a direct impact on temperatures and the sun causing temperature fluctuations on other planets as well. Instead of getting wrapped up in that argument, approach it from this angle:

What could cleaning our act up hurt? Wouldn't it be nice to live in a civilized world with minimal pollutants, breathable city air, edible seafood and drinkable water?
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5176|Sydney
I read something yesterday that said "40% of all illnesses are caused by pollution".

I don't know if that's one of the 87% of statistics that are made up on the spot, but regardless, there is certainly some truth to that.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6150|what

Let's not forget it was which President that signed off on the EPA...?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6769|PNW

Jay wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

Ralph Nader it is.
He retired. Now Jill Stein is running in his place.

http://www.jillstein.org/ wrote:

We are occupying our city squares, our imperiled schools, workplaces, and threatened homes. And now, with this election, we are going to occupy the voting booth in November.
...HAHAHAHA.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6769|PNW



Are we supposed to be surprised at his nomination?
Cheeky_Ninja06
Member
+52|6730|Cambridge, England

Jaekus wrote:

I read something yesterday that said "40% of all illnesses are caused by pollution".

I don't know if that's one of the 87% of statistics that are made up on the spot, but regardless, there is certainly some truth to that.
I call bullshit. The common cold must make up a fair chunk of "all illnesses" and thats before we look at malaria or HIV
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6150|what

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Are we supposed to be surprised at his nomination?
https://i.imgur.com/VSjr6.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6687|Tampa Bay Florida
^ I don't think he's a psychopath, I just think he's socially inept

unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6769|PNW

Spearhead wrote:

^ I don't think he's a psychopath, I just think he's socially inept
Some men just want to watch the world wear special underpants.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5583

Mitt Romney described almost half of Americans as “dependent upon government” during a private reception with donors this year and said those voters were likely to support President Obama because they believe they are “entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it."
...
In one video segment, Mr. Romney described how his campaign is writing off “47 percent of the people” who will vote for Mr. Obama “no matter what.” He adds that those people “are people who pay no income tax” and says “so our message of low taxes doesn’t connect.”

Mr. Romney said that “my job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”
Video in link
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012 … overnment/


In an audio clip of the same fund-raiser, apparently posted on the Internet by the person who gave the videos to Mother Jones, Mr. Romney is heard joking that he would have had an easier time winning the election if his father had been born to Mexican parents.

“My dad, as you probably know, was the governor of Michigan and was the head of a car company,” Mr. Romney says in the audio clip. “But he was born in Mexico and, uh, had he been born of, uh, Mexican parents, I’d have a better shot at winning this.”
Seriously dude what the fuck?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard