So they say.
If they actually had them they would have likely used them by now.
If they actually had them they would have likely used them by now.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- A small nuclear war would reduce global crop yields
Not sure if I trust Syria or North Korea with nukes.A2TG2 wrote:
Weapons of mass destruction equal peace and hence, all nations should have them.
N Korea can only nuke itself until it develops missiles more effective than fireworks.Jaekus wrote:
Not sure if I trust Syria or North Korea with nukes.A2TG2 wrote:
Weapons of mass destruction equal peace and hence, all nations should have them.
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
Nuclear weapons are the great keeper of the peace
if Pakistan had them they would have probably used them
if Pakistan had them they would have probably used them
He did effectively say North Korea should have properly operational nukes. Great concept I'm sure.ROGUEDD wrote:
N Korea can only nuke itself until it develops missiles more effective than fireworks.Jaekus wrote:
Not sure if I trust Syria or North Korea with nukes.A2TG2 wrote:
Weapons of mass destruction equal peace and hence, all nations should have them.
erm wat?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Nuclear weapons are the great keeper of the peace
if Pakistan had them they would have probably used them
Fuck Israel
heh, i never pictured me agreeing with Dilbert. thanks, KENNINGSDilbert_X wrote:
erm wat?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Nuclear weapons are the great keeper of the peace
if Pakistan had them they would have probably used them
He was quoting atg from two different posts. Pointing out the contradiction.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
do you actually read the posts in a thread or just respond to the last post?Dilbert_X wrote:
erm wat?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Nuclear weapons are the great keeper of the peace
if Pakistan had them they would have probably used them
So, test detonations don't count as "having them?"A2TG2 wrote:
So they say.
If they actually had them they would have likely used them by now.
What in the heck do you think all the nuclear testing in the 20th century did?Shocking wrote:
If Pakistan and India completely vaporize eachother (which is what happens if they decide to use 50 nukes), I would be surprised if we didn't get a nuclear winter.
You actually quoted two tests by Pakistan.A2TG2 wrote:
So they say.
If they actually had them they would have likely used them by now.
A lot of those tests were underground tbf
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
newb, I am suggesting that they no longer have access to their nukes.
Reports after 9-11 suggested U.S. troops were " overseeing " their stockpile.
Reports after 9-11 suggested U.S. troops were " overseeing " their stockpile.
There were lots of reports of stuff after 9/11, none of them turned out to be true.
Fuck Israel
Like that Islamic terrorist did it?
It was a false flag operation.
People inside our government did it, and they need to be held liable.
No plane hit the pentagon. No bodies in Pennsylvania and no good reason why WTC #7 fell, except for what was in that building that needed to be hidden.
Our country has suffered a coup, and you are all now bankers bitches.
It is a unpleasant truth but one you are better off dealing with in a forthright manner.
It was a false flag operation.
People inside our government did it, and they need to be held liable.
No plane hit the pentagon. No bodies in Pennsylvania and no good reason why WTC #7 fell, except for what was in that building that needed to be hidden.
Our country has suffered a coup, and you are all now bankers bitches.
It is a unpleasant truth but one you are better off dealing with in a forthright manner.
orly owl.jpg
That must be why the squares here never heard of them. *snort snort*Spark wrote:
A lot of those tests were underground tbf
A2TG2 wrote:
Like that Islamic terrorist did it?
It was a false flag operation.
People inside our government did it, and they need to be held liable.
No plane hit the pentagon. No bodies in Pennsylvania and no good reason why WTC #7 fell, except for what was in that building that needed to be hidden.
Our country has suffered a coup, and you are all now bankers bitches.
It is a unpleasant truth but one you are better off dealing with in a forthright manner.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6932
A small nuclear war would reduce global happiness.
There has been no point in time ever that there were 50+ high yield detonations in the span of a few weeks (to top it off; in the same general area).unnamednewbie13 wrote:
What in the heck do you think all the nuclear testing in the 20th century did?Shocking wrote:
If Pakistan and India completely vaporize eachother (which is what happens if they decide to use 50 nukes), I would be surprised if we didn't get a nuclear winter.
Last edited by Shocking (2012-07-29 11:52:47)
inane little opines
cliche, but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_testing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_testing
Who let either one of these retarded third world countries acquire nukes? There's a reason third world countries are third world, because the leaders are idiots, now they're free to bomb each other over whatever likely petty shit they feel like getting prideful and angry about.
If nukes are allowed to exist, they should only be for deterrent purposes, not for offensive measures
If nukes are allowed to exist, they should only be for deterrent purposes, not for offensive measures
Right, only because "the leaders are idiots?"
Your "intelligent" leaders did._j5689_ wrote:
Who let either one of these retarded third world countries acquire nukes?
Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
Your Our "intelligent" leaders did._j5689_ wrote:
Who let either one of these retarded third world countries acquire nukes?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- A small nuclear war would reduce global crop yields