DrunkFace wrote:
I think we need some visual representations adams.
about as extreme as I can get lol
DrunkFace wrote:
I think we need some visual representations adams.
Not necessarily.Adams_BJ wrote:
not once you get the top off
saggy saggy saggy saggy saggy
yes necessarily. the skin is the same big or small, but the weight of larger breasts is a lot heavier. So clearly clearly the smaller breast looking bigger proportionately and having all the perkiness of a teenage girl is better than big tits sagging on a tall girl. even though the look the same. proportionately.War Man wrote:
Not necessarily.Adams_BJ wrote:
not once you get the top off
saggy saggy saggy saggy saggy
i dont know how you can consider yourself under average when you are averageFinray wrote:
i'm 5'10"
i consider myself under-average
once went on a date with a girl, she was there first, walked in, had a lovely chat over a coffee, stood up to leave, she's 6'4". Didn't call her back.
I consider 5'11 to be a reasonable enough height for men, 5'10 is only reasonable for non-white men.Mutantbear wrote:
i dont know how you can consider yourself under average when you are averageFinray wrote:
i'm 5'10"
i consider myself under-average
once went on a date with a girl, she was there first, walked in, had a lovely chat over a coffee, stood up to leave, she's 6'4". Didn't call her back.
its not hard
So you're saying white men are superior to non-white men and that's the way it should be. Way to go, racist.War Man wrote:
I consider 5'11 to be a reasonable enough height for men, 5'10 is only reasonable for non-white men.Mutantbear wrote:
i dont know how you can consider yourself under average when you are averageFinray wrote:
i'm 5'10"
i consider myself under-average
once went on a date with a girl, she was there first, walked in, had a lovely chat over a coffee, stood up to leave, she's 6'4". Didn't call her back.
its not hard
No I'm not saying that, you are saying that. Just white men tend to be the tallest of the bunch, not always the case of course.mtb0minime wrote:
So you're saying white men are superior to non-white men and that's the way it should be. Way to go, racist.War Man wrote:
I consider 5'11 to be a reasonable enough height for men, 5'10 is only reasonable for non-white men.Mutantbear wrote:
i dont know how you can consider yourself under average when you are average
its not hard
Last edited by War Man (2012-06-14 09:08:16)
youre short.Finray wrote:
i'm 5'10"
i consider myself under-average
once went on a date with a girl, she was there first, walked in, had a lovely chat over a coffee, stood up to leave, she's 6'4". Didn't call her back.
black men are on average taller than white menWar Man wrote:
No I'm not saying that, you are saying that. Just white men tend to be the tallest of the bunch, not always the case of course.mtb0minime wrote:
So you're saying white men are superior to non-white men and that's the way it should be. Way to go, racist.War Man wrote:
I consider 5'11 to be a reasonable enough height for men, 5'10 is only reasonable for non-white men.
Last edited by Mutantbear (2012-06-14 09:39:26)
I'm 6'9", you're one tall mother fuckerMutantbear wrote:
Im 7'2 but I dont really consider people tall unless they are taller than me