BF2S Forums Design a new college system

Jay wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

I'd rather see someone make it to college based on grades than who their daddy was or how much money they have.

The government can pay for the tuition with interest free loans that are paid once the degree is earned and the person starts earning a decent wage.

But your opinion is irrelevant mr marx.

lol'ed. That's pretty sad, Jay. Marx is concerned only with the means of production. Socialism =/= communism.

The subsidies that raise college cost are the infinite amount of money provided by student loans. Pell grants, the program designed to help poor students go to school (you know the ones you used and later pretended to be a self made libertarian who didn't use handouts) don't raise cost because of how small and how uncommon they are compared to student loan money.

Jay wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

But your opinion is irrelevant mr marx.

lol'ed. That's pretty sad, Jay. Marx is concerned only with the means of production. Socialism =/= communism.

Yeah, completely unrelated.

hahahahahaha. "you're left of center, and therefore I can lump you together and incorrectly name-drop your leading philosophers". Jay, just stick to engineering.

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

lol'ed. That's pretty sad, Jay. Marx is concerned only with the means of production. Socialism =/= communism.

Yeah, completely unrelated.

hahahahahaha. "you're left of center, and therefore I can lump you together and incorrectly name-drop your leading philosophers". Jay, just stick to engineering.

Did you ever read Jay's discourse on Hegel?

AussieReaper wrote:

Jay wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Were you fat in college too?

Maybe, but at least I wasn't completely retarded. Is your degree in pool management?

It's a degree in Information Technology.

All the fatties took up engineering courses here too.

Ahh no wonder you're such a socialist, you make $15/hr

Macbeth wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

Yeah, completely unrelated.

hahahahahaha. "you're left of center, and therefore I can lump you together and incorrectly name-drop your leading philosophers". Jay, just stick to engineering.

Did you ever read Jay's discourse on Hegel?

Will look it up sometime tomorrow. Sounds like I'm in for at least a few good laughs.

Well, this thread is obviously done.

Pochsy just got added to Jays do not like list. The list is ever growing. This raises the question: does jay like anyone on this site? Does anyone like jay?

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

hahahahahaha. "you're left of center, and therefore I can lump you together and incorrectly name-drop your leading philosophers". Jay, just stick to engineering.

Do you have anything worthwhile to add or just spam?

You're getting lazy Jay. I was expecting a grand defense of your broad sweeping claim that communism is in fact socialism, in essence.

I do like how when called out you immediately resort to childish remarks that amount to little more than the all too common "I know you are but what am I". You're getting married soon, man; you had better learn to carry yourself in a more dignified manner.

Thanks for the life advice, kid.

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

You're getting lazy Jay. I was expecting a grand defense of your broad sweeping claim that communism is in fact socialism, in essence.

I do like how when called out you immediately resort to childish remarks that amount to little more than the all too common "I know you are but what am I". You're getting married soon, man; you had better learn to carry yourself in a more dignified manner.

Thanks for the life advice, kid.

I give because I care, gramps. Just try and be less childish and you would at least leave these arguments with some dignity.

Be less childish? I simply said not to spam the thread. It had already devolved into stupid and you were expecting me to write you a treatise about communism on my smart phone? Lol.

Jay wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

Thanks for the life advice, kid.

I give because I care, gramps. Just try and be less childish and you would at least leave these arguments with some dignity.

Be less childish? I simply said not to spam the thread. It had already devolved into stupid and you were expecting me to write you a treatise about communism on my smart phone? Lol.

Again, a childish inability to point directly to your own transgressions. I trust you are at least doing this intentionally in an attempt to save whatever you perceive as a defensible stance. You're well educated, and surely able to comprehend the structure of an argument. The spam started the moment you began calling people Marxists (wrongly), at which point I jumped in to call you out.

Also, how was I to know you were on a cellphone? And how does this enhance your defense?

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

I give because I care, gramps. Just try and be less childish and you would at least leave these arguments with some dignity.

Be less childish? I simply said not to spam the thread. It had already devolved into stupid and you were expecting me to write you a treatise about communism on my smart phone? Lol.

Again, a childish inability to point directly to your own transgressions. I trust you are at least doing this intentionally in an attempt to save whatever you perceive as a defensible stance. You're well educated, and surely able to comprehend the structure of an argument. The spam started the moment you began calling people Marxists (wrongly), at which point I jumped in to call you out.

Also, how was I to know you were on a cellphone? And how does this enhance your defense?

So communism and socialism arent both derived from marx? News to me.

Jay wrote:

Pochsy wrote:

Jay wrote:

Be less childish? I simply said not to spam the thread. It had already devolved into stupid and you were expecting me to write you a treatise about communism on my smart phone? Lol.

Again, a childish inability to point directly to your own transgressions. I trust you are at least doing this intentionally in an attempt to save whatever you perceive as a defensible stance. You're well educated, and surely able to comprehend the structure of an argument. The spam started the moment you began calling people Marxists (wrongly), at which point I jumped in to call you out.

Also, how was I to know you were on a cellphone? And how does this enhance your defense?

So communism and socialism arent both derived from marx? News to me.

No. Only communism is "derived from marx". Perhaps it is too confusing to have systems of thought which are further down the political spectrum from one another. Black and White does it for Jay, I suppose.