HudsonFalcon
Member
+20|6171|New York

Macbeth wrote:

HudsonFalcon wrote:

I don't see the logic in this since Great Britian has a huge Islamic population.  Isn't Sharia Law even implemented in their courts?
I don't know what you mean about the Islamic population of Britain but regarding Sharia law- it is also in some U.S. states courts. Well a lot of states actually. In a civil case if both sides agree to it then the case can go forward according to Sharia. I am pretty sure Jews have something similar.
I mean there is a huge population of Muslims in Great Britian, France also has a substantial population and rather than following the laws of the land they seek to implement their own form of justice.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6740|so randum

HudsonFalcon wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

HudsonFalcon wrote:

I don't see the logic in this since Great Britian has a huge Islamic population.  Isn't Sharia Law even implemented in their courts?
I don't know what you mean about the Islamic population of Britain but regarding Sharia law- it is also in some U.S. states courts. Well a lot of states actually. In a civil case if both sides agree to it then the case can go forward according to Sharia. I am pretty sure Jews have something similar.
I mean there is a huge population of Muslims in Great Britian, France also has a substantial population and rather than following the laws of the land they seek to implement their own form of justice.
they can have their own civil courts for trivial stuff, same for jews/christians/flying spaghetti monster followers. anything actually criminal is still subject to normal law

also if by huge population you mean 2.8% then well yes

Last edited by FatherTed (2011-12-01 10:45:49)

Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5825

HudsonFalcon wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

HudsonFalcon wrote:

I don't see the logic in this since Great Britian has a huge Islamic population.  Isn't Sharia Law even implemented in their courts?
I don't know what you mean about the Islamic population of Britain but regarding Sharia law- it is also in some U.S. states courts. Well a lot of states actually. In a civil case if both sides agree to it then the case can go forward according to Sharia. I am pretty sure Jews have something similar.
I mean there is a huge population of Muslims in Great Britian, France also has a substantial population and rather than following the laws of the land they seek to implement their own form of justice.
I reread the the thread a few times and I still don't know where that came from but anyway...

I don't live in either if those two countries but I am aware of their large Muslim population. I think the whole 'they want to live by Sharia' thing is over stated. I doubt most of the Muslims in either of those countries want to live under Sharia and even if they did they are still way too small compared to the natives to make a difference.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6740|so randum
read up maccyb
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5825

FatherTed wrote:

read up maccyb
France is like 10% IIRC. Compared to our less than 1% you guys have a lot. My post agreed with yours that the population of natives still overawe their Muslim immigrants.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6740|so randum
france is between 6-8%. sounds big compared to america sure, but remember that both of these countries (in UK/GB collection of countries) have a long history of owning the shit out of other countries hence a more diverse population.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5825

We owned blacks, Cubans, Filipinos, and still own Puerto Ricans. So I guess there is something to that though other countries have pushed out their colonial conquest. I am looking at you Spain and Russia. As far as the colonial countries go I think it's a badge of honour in a way to tolerate people from former colonies. But that's my wanky liberal side..

I think geography plays a big part too. We are far removed from the middle east and only get people who want to be here ( hence why I can't say anything bad about the U.S. Muslim population). You guys tend to get refugees in the same way we get refugees from Mexico. You guys also seem to have "issues" with your Muslims like we have "issues" with our Mexicans. It's all relative.

Last edited by Macbeth (2011-12-01 11:12:47)

HudsonFalcon
Member
+20|6171|New York

Macbeth wrote:

HudsonFalcon wrote:

Macbeth wrote:


I don't know what you mean about the Islamic population of Britain but regarding Sharia law- it is also in some U.S. states courts. Well a lot of states actually. In a civil case if both sides agree to it then the case can go forward according to Sharia. I am pretty sure Jews have something similar.
I mean there is a huge population of Muslims in Great Britian, France also has a substantial population and rather than following the laws of the land they seek to implement their own form of justice.
I reread the the thread a few times and I still don't know where that came from but anyway...

I don't live in either if those two countries but I am aware of their large Muslim population. I think the whole 'they want to live by Sharia' thing is over stated. I doubt most of the Muslims in either of those countries want to live under Sharia and even if they did they are still way too small compared to the natives to make a difference.
Yeah I'm sorry it's definitely not you I've been working way too much and something got lost in translation.

For me it's just hard to understand why students, of all people, who are the main source for new thinking and ideas would storm the embassy of a country who by all measures has been a safe haven for the people of Islam and have even gone as far as using Sharia Law as a legal measure.  However from glancing at an article about the incident it stated the students were "hard lined Iranians" which I assume means pro-government and thus anti-west, anti-freedom, etc.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5825

HudsonFalcon wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

HudsonFalcon wrote:

I mean there is a huge population of Muslims in Great Britian, France also has a substantial population and rather than following the laws of the land they seek to implement their own form of justice.
I reread the the thread a few times and I still don't know where that came from but anyway...

I don't live in either if those two countries but I am aware of their large Muslim population. I think the whole 'they want to live by Sharia' thing is over stated. I doubt most of the Muslims in either of those countries want to live under Sharia and even if they did they are still way too small compared to the natives to make a difference.
Yeah I'm sorry it's definitely not you I've been working way too much and something got lost in translation.

For me it's just hard to understand why students, of all people, who are the main source for new thinking and ideas would storm the embassy of a country who by all measures has been a safe haven for the people of Islam and have even gone as far as using Sharia Law as a legal measure.  However from glancing at an article about the incident it stated the students were "hard lined Iranians" which I assume means pro-government and thus anti-west, anti-freedom, etc.
eh. It could have been just a small group thing like Occupy WS (not reflective of the whole mass if students like OWS). Or it could have been provoked or encouraged by the government. The latter wouldn't surprise me.

Iranian people and students aren't as backwards as people will tend to believe because of incidents like this. Their government and military is the problem. For instance
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blo … _blog.html

It's chic to have dogs in Iran but the government doesn't like them.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6710

HudsonFalcon wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

HudsonFalcon wrote:


I mean there is a huge population of Muslims in Great Britian, France also has a substantial population and rather than following the laws of the land they seek to implement their own form of justice.
I reread the the thread a few times and I still don't know where that came from but anyway...

I don't live in either if those two countries but I am aware of their large Muslim population. I think the whole 'they want to live by Sharia' thing is over stated. I doubt most of the Muslims in either of those countries want to live under Sharia and even if they did they are still way too small compared to the natives to make a difference.
Yeah I'm sorry it's definitely not you I've been working way too much and something got lost in translation.

For me it's just hard to understand why students, of all people, who are the main source for new thinking and ideas would storm the embassy of a country who by all measures has been a safe haven for the people of Islam and have even gone as far as using Sharia Law as a legal measure.  However from glancing at an article about the incident it stated the students were "hard lined Iranians" which I assume means pro-government and thus anti-west, anti-freedom, etc.
it's because students and the youth can easily be hijacked by the right as well. students aren't always marxist progressives getting shot on us campuses, you know. check out these guys, for example:

https://02varvara.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/01020100578200.jpg
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
HudsonFalcon
Member
+20|6171|New York
^Agreed.  I have no doubt that a majority of the Iranian people, especially the youth, have a difference of opinion from their leaders.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7011|PNW

I read that as HAW BEEBOP.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6914|Canberra, AUS
Wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be a "protest" padded out by Basij tbh
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Chardee MacDennis
Green Man
+130|4794|Always Sunny in Philadelphia
i cant imagine people can do this in tehran without the govt knowing tbh
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?

What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Chardee MacDennis
Green Man
+130|4794|Always Sunny in Philadelphia
that being said i think the whole embassy stuff is downright stupid and useless
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?

What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Chardee MacDennis
Green Man
+130|4794|Always Sunny in Philadelphia
at least obama called it the english embassy
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?

What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6345|eXtreme to the maX

Chardee MacDennis wrote:

fyi i do not know what you are thinking but no US leader will go to war right now.  that i can pretty much safely guarantee you.  as for the brits and jewish terrorists...i dunno.
You're saying if Israel started a war America wouldn't be right behind them?
at least obama called it the english embassy
He got that wrong.
Fuck Israel
Chardee MacDennis
Green Man
+130|4794|Always Sunny in Philadelphia

Dilbert_X wrote:

You're saying if Israel started a war America wouldn't be right behind them?
yes that is what i am saying.
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?

What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6345|eXtreme to the maX
I bet they would, Obama has completely backed down and given in to everything Netanyahu has demanded so far, while increasing the rhetoric against Iran - while Pakistan is killing NATO troops Americans included, somehwt more than Iran has ever done or is likely to do.

Israel's priorities are the US President's prioirites it seems.
Iraq was first, Iran is next.
Fuck Israel
Chardee MacDennis
Green Man
+130|4794|Always Sunny in Philadelphia
nah.  congress would not allow it.  and if the prez said lets go do it anyway...you can pretty much turn off the campaign commercials.  to me it would be like WWII.  it would take some sort of action here to get us going there.
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?

What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6914|Canberra, AUS
Hmm. You don't think a repub congress would be seriously tempted to go in lockstep with Israel?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Chardee MacDennis
Green Man
+130|4794|Always Sunny in Philadelphia

Spark wrote:

Hmm. You don't think a repub congress would be seriously tempted to go in lockstep with Israel?
nope.  they want to get elected.  bad timing for israel i guess.
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?

What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6345|eXtreme to the maX
I don't see the problem, a few days of cruise missile strikes and B1Bs dropping bunker busters all over Iran would hardly be an issue, its not as if there would be a ground war.
Fuck Israel
Chardee MacDennis
Green Man
+130|4794|Always Sunny in Philadelphia

Dilbert_X wrote:

I don't see the problem, a few days of cruise missile strikes and B1Bs dropping bunker busters all over Iran would hardly be an issue, its not as if there would be a ground war.
i agree they would do a no fly zone illegal libya thing sure.  but, just like libya that aint a war....lulz
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?

What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6914|Canberra, AUS

Chardee MacDennis wrote:

Spark wrote:

Hmm. You don't think a repub congress would be seriously tempted to go in lockstep with Israel?
nope.  they want to get elected.  bad timing for israel i guess.
elected by who though? how popular is a strongly pro-israel position in america, and specifically in repub-leaning districts?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard