i don't know the background of that woman (apparently, she is not a neonazi), but pierre vogel is a fuckin cuntunnamednewbie13 wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-ELZk_X6_k
Dear Muslims,
Please don't piss off the Germans.
Sincerely,
Americans
I thought Captain Obvious made it clear that she wasn't a Neonazi after comparing Islamofascism to Hitler's Naziism. She's just maaaad.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-5 … formation/
I think some threads have been made about this in the past, and it's something that most people who pay attention to the news probably realize is going on, without having to be told...
But I personally didn't realize that the laws governing insider trading apparently don't apply to Congressional members. As in literally do not apply...they can trade to their heart's contentment, based on perhaps the BEST insider information you could hope to have.
The positions held by these individuals should be, first and foremost, dedicated to service and actually doing the job of representing their constituencies, etc. And while I don't oppose people gaining wealth from the work they do, or even from sources outside of that work, this seems like a huuuuuuuuuuuuge, glaring loophole that needs to be fixed pronto.
It's no wonder some of these assholes pull in tens of millions a year, while earning a salary that's less than a lot of healthcare professionals can earn. (And we, as a nation, have so much to show for their hard work!)
More fuel for the Occupy fires, I suppose....
**sorry if this had been discussed here, I did a quick - not thorough - search beforehand...**
I think some threads have been made about this in the past, and it's something that most people who pay attention to the news probably realize is going on, without having to be told...
But I personally didn't realize that the laws governing insider trading apparently don't apply to Congressional members. As in literally do not apply...they can trade to their heart's contentment, based on perhaps the BEST insider information you could hope to have.
The positions held by these individuals should be, first and foremost, dedicated to service and actually doing the job of representing their constituencies, etc. And while I don't oppose people gaining wealth from the work they do, or even from sources outside of that work, this seems like a huuuuuuuuuuuuge, glaring loophole that needs to be fixed pronto.
It's no wonder some of these assholes pull in tens of millions a year, while earning a salary that's less than a lot of healthcare professionals can earn. (And we, as a nation, have so much to show for their hard work!)
More fuel for the Occupy fires, I suppose....
**sorry if this had been discussed here, I did a quick - not thorough - search beforehand...**
Weird. I have to, because of my position in the government, file forms every year that disclose all my stock holdings to ensure I am not profiting from insider knowledge. The laws that require that were written by those jokers.
Hypocrisy much?
Hypocrisy much?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
what if one passed the insider info to relatives or friends? or do they keep an eye on those too?FEOS wrote:
Weird. I have to, because of my position in the government, file forms every year that disclose all my stock holdings to ensure I am not profiting from insider knowledge. The laws that require that were written by those jokers.
Last edited by Shahter (2011-11-15 03:46:56)
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Dammit! I never thought of that!Shahter wrote:
what if one passed the insider info to relatives or friends? or do they keep an eye on those too?FEOS wrote:
Weird. I have to, because of my position in the government, file forms every year that disclose all my stock holdings to ensure I am not profiting from insider knowledge. The laws that require that were written by those jokers.
Me and my "integrity"...
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
umm... ha ha, ha ha, i guess.FEOS wrote:
Dammit! I never thought of that!Shahter wrote:
what if one passed the insider info to relatives or friends? or do they keep an eye on those too?FEOS wrote:
Weird. I have to, because of my position in the government, file forms every year that disclose all my stock holdings to ensure I am not profiting from insider knowledge. The laws that require that were written by those jokers.
Me and my "integrity"...
but, seriously, how far through one's acquaintances would they go to check if people are leaking info? the task seems overwhelming.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
For small share transactions they aren't going to notice, but there are systems in place which do search for odd transactions.
Grandmas suddenly buying thousands of shares out of the blue and making quick profits can and do get noticed.
Grandmas suddenly buying thousands of shares out of the blue and making quick profits can and do get noticed.
Fuck Israel
IDK. The forms are only for me and my immediate family (wife and children). I'm sure if other relatives started striking it rich and buying me gifts based on stock earnings in companies that I have dealings with, it wouldn't take a rocket surgeon to do the math there.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Macbeth wrote:
oh yeah the guy who didn't go to the police when he knew children were getting raped is such a great guy because you know football. Fuck him.Hundreds spilled into the streets at Penn State early Thursday morning following news that football head coach Joe Paterno and the school's president were ousted over a child sex abuse scandal at the university.
What started as an apparent celebration of Paterno turned raucous, as the crowd tipped over a news van and decried the media. The university said on its Facebook page that police issued a dispersal order for the Old Main and downtown areas, and "everyone must vacate both areas immediately."
...
The disturbance came shortly after university trustees announced Wednesday night that Paterno, the winningest coach in major college football, and Penn State President Graham Spanier were out of their jobs, effective immediately.
...
The crowd cheered and said, "We love you, Joe."
...
Some had called for Paterno to resign immediately because of his response to allegations brought to him in 2002 by a graduate assistant, who said he had seen retired defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky, now 67, sexually assaulting a young boy in a shower at the campus football complex.
http://cnn.com/video/?/video/sports/201 … hakeup.cnn
Admits to showering with kids, horseplay, and touching them but not sexually abusing them. My guess is he's going to off himself pretty soon.
One of the more disturbing things I've seen in a while...
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
He speaks like its not a big deal. Truly amazing.
What is your Spaghetti Policy Here?
What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
What A Long Strange Trip It's Been
Its unnatural for any man to take more than a passing interest in the children of another man.Macbeth wrote:
Admits to showering with kids, horseplay, and touching them but not sexually abusing them. My guess is he's going to off himself pretty soon.
Be suspicious of anyone who goes further than "how are your kids". The actions above are well beyond that.
Fuck Israel
Did his lawyer OK this interview, I wonder? The only thing that could've been worse is if he just said it straight up.
Multiple people have essentially said: "Worst defense team in the world." Can't say I disagree.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Did his lawyer OK this interview, I wonder? The only thing that could've been worse is if he just said it straight up.
Only thing I can possibly imagine is that they are hoping to so taint the jury pool that they will be unable to get a fair trial and thus it will never actually go to criminal court.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/nov/1 … tube-train
Just sayin'.
Racism is terrible, and it's good they run these stories, but it's funny how he, self-proclaimed liberal, doesn't even address the blatant sexism to begin with.."The driver made two announcements. The gentlemen should watch their wallets, he said; the ladies their handbags."
The second announcement pricked the bubble. "There are many pickpockets about," said the driver five minutes later. And, he said, there are many people "within this country" who come from "other European countries" who would be more than happy to relieve you of your possessions in the run up to Christmas. His warning transmitted, the driver clicked off his microphone and focused on driving his train.
"I wondered if others had heard it; what they thought," explains Stewart, over coffee. "Another bit of lazy kneejerk racism seeps into our society."
Just sayin'.
right. but what if you passed info to me?FEOS wrote:
IDK. The forms are only for me and my immediate family (wife and children). I'm sure if other relatives started striking it rich and buying me gifts based on stock earnings in companies that I have dealings with, it wouldn't take a rocket surgeon to do the math there.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
TBH, I don't think the forms cover that. But the ethics requirements do.Shahter wrote:
right. but what if you passed info to me?FEOS wrote:
IDK. The forms are only for me and my immediate family (wife and children). I'm sure if other relatives started striking it rich and buying me gifts based on stock earnings in companies that I have dealings with, it wouldn't take a rocket surgeon to do the math there.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
I was watching a program the other week where Poland comes and picks up about 60 people in a military plane every 2 weeks who have left Poland and come to the UK to avoid criminal convictions like assault and theft.Jenspm wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/nov/15/racism-commuter-london-tube-trainRacism is terrible, and it's good they run these stories, but it's funny how he, self-proclaimed liberal, doesn't even address the blatant sexism to begin with.."The driver made two announcements. The gentlemen should watch their wallets, he said; the ladies their handbags."
The second announcement pricked the bubble. "There are many pickpockets about," said the driver five minutes later. And, he said, there are many people "within this country" who come from "other European countries" who would be more than happy to relieve you of your possessions in the run up to Christmas. His warning transmitted, the driver clicked off his microphone and focused on driving his train.
"I wondered if others had heard it; what they thought," explains Stewart, over coffee. "Another bit of lazy kneejerk racism seeps into our society."
Just sayin'.
Introduction to janitorial studies electivesNewt Gingrich tonight said at an address at Harvard that child work laws "entrap" poor children into poverty - and suggested that a better way to handle failing schools is to fire the janitors, hire the local students and let them get paid for upkeep.
The comment came in response to an undergrad's question about income equality during his talk at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Continue Reading
"This is something that no liberal wants to deal with," Gingrich said. "Core policies of protecting unionization and bureaucratization against children in the poorest neighborhoods, crippling them by putting them in schools that fail has done more to create income inequality in the United States than any other single policy. It is tragic what we do in the poorest neighborhoods, entrapping children in, first of all, child laws, which are truly stupid.
"You say to somebody, you shouldn't go to work before you're what, 14, 16 years of age, fine. You're totally poor. You're in a school that is failing with a teacher that is failing. I've tried for years to have a very simple model," he said. "Most of these schools ought to get rid of the unionized janitors, have one master janitor and pay local students to take care of the school. The kids would actually do work, they would have cash, they would have pride in the schools, they'd begin the process of rising."
He added, "You go out and talk to people, as I do, you go out and talk to people who are really successful in one generation. They all started their first job between nine and 14 years of age. They all were either selling newspapers, going door to door, they were doing something, they were washing cars."
His basic premise is that workplace protectionism is just as injurious to the national economy as macro-protectionism. Workplace protectionism being things like requiring lawyers to pass the bar, or engineers to pass their license exams, or closed shops requiring union membership. Anything that sets bars for entry necessarily restricts trade and artificially drives up prices. Child labor laws fit into this argument (as do minimum wage laws).
That said, I don't understand why a politician with national aspirations would bring any of that up. Nothing says 'I'm an idealistic market anarchist' like going after child labor laws.
That said, I don't understand why a politician with national aspirations would bring any of that up. Nothing says 'I'm an idealistic market anarchist' like going after child labor laws.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
How is equating handbags with women and wallets for men sexist exactly?Jenspm wrote:
Racism is terrible, and it's good they run these stories, but it's funny how he, self-proclaimed liberal, doesn't even address the blatant sexism to begin with..
Just sayin'.
Should he have also mentioned manbags or something?
/missing the pointMacbeth wrote:
Introduction to janitorial studies electivesNewt Gingrich tonight said at an address at Harvard that child work laws "entrap" poor children into poverty - and suggested that a better way to handle failing schools is to fire the janitors, hire the local students and let them get paid for upkeep.
The comment came in response to an undergrad's question about income equality during his talk at Harvard's Kennedy School.
Continue Reading
"This is something that no liberal wants to deal with," Gingrich said. "Core policies of protecting unionization and bureaucratization against children in the poorest neighborhoods, crippling them by putting them in schools that fail has done more to create income inequality in the United States than any other single policy. It is tragic what we do in the poorest neighborhoods, entrapping children in, first of all, child laws, which are truly stupid.
"You say to somebody, you shouldn't go to work before you're what, 14, 16 years of age, fine. You're totally poor. You're in a school that is failing with a teacher that is failing. I've tried for years to have a very simple model," he said. "Most of these schools ought to get rid of the unionized janitors, have one master janitor and pay local students to take care of the school. The kids would actually do work, they would have cash, they would have pride in the schools, they'd begin the process of rising."
He added, "You go out and talk to people, as I do, you go out and talk to people who are really successful in one generation. They all started their first job between nine and 14 years of age. They all were either selling newspapers, going door to door, they were doing something, they were washing cars."
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Nice interview about national security budgets
Last edited by Jay (2011-11-21 20:05:40)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Apparently the Sovs want to deploy missiles in response to the US deploying missile defense systems in Eastern Europe. lawl