with ships
Pages: 1 … 398 399 400 401 402 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
there's an ignore feature?Finray wrote:
Gotta love the ignore feature
why have i not heard of this?!
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
1942 was the shit. We should organize a bf2s 1942 night
What do you guys think of the LMG bipod feature? I think it's pretty leet, although it does increase camping tendency in some players.
"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"
I love it! The first time I had a similar feature was in Call of Duty World at War, but those freaking retards removed it from from PC as being deployable on the ground and made it only for window sills and other lame objects because of a console related issue. The LMGs were amazing on bipods in that game as they are in this one.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Will never happen, have to let it go.[-DER-]Omega wrote:
i really hope they don't and rather invest that time in making a decent bf.aerodynamic wrote:
but we all know the dlcs are just gonna be a few maps and camos.
i really hope they make dlcs with more weapons, like back to karkand.
I´d love to see 2143. I wonder why they never revisited an objective based game mode like Titan or the one where you could cap the enemy homebase once you held all other CP´s (forgot what it was called).
In regard to Titan, because they could never manage to make it lag free. I am convinced DICE has some kind of split teams or something because they manage to make pretty decent game engines etc then cant manage to fix anything at all later on.
Titan mode was so much better than conquest but when they changed it so the titans couldnt move it really limited the game mode.
Titan mode was so much better than conquest but when they changed it so the titans couldnt move it really limited the game mode.
They nerfed titans and drop pods so hard that they were eventually uselessTimmmmaaaaH wrote:
In regard to Titan, because they could never manage to make it lag free. I am convinced DICE has some kind of split teams or something because they manage to make pretty decent game engines etc then cant manage to fix anything at all later on.
Titan mode was so much better than conquest but when they changed it so the titans couldnt move it really limited the game mode.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
The only issue with titan was the titans layout, the last corridors were too linear.
Yeah it was a massive spamfest on both ends to fight through when you had taken out 2 or 3 of them, making all the defenders camp the same hallway rather than spread out in 4...Vilham wrote:
The only issue with titan was the titans layout, the last corridors were too linear.
But it was ok, because it was a balance exercise on how many people you need defending the titan vs how many you can afford to send ground-side to defend/capture missile silos vs how many you could send to the enemy titan...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
the only time i ever played on the titans was when i glitched into the side of them and rained down frag-bullet death on all the noobs in the chokepoints. i really don't get why people romanticize 2142... it felt so buggy and heavy, like your character was laden with giant helium balloons trying to get around the map on rollerskates. the shooting was shit (kneel and hold mouse1 as support? um ok) and most of the unlocks were dumb sci-fi novelties. interesting concept but the game was meh.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
agreed , as soon as titan gitching wasn't possible in any way I stopped playingUzique wrote:
the only time i ever played on the titans was when i glitched into the side of them and rained down frag-bullet death on all the noobs in the chokepoints. i really don't get why people romanticize 2142... it felt so buggy and heavy, like your character was laden with giant helium balloons trying to get around the map on rollerskates. the shooting was shit (kneel and hold mouse1 as support? um ok) and most of the unlocks were dumb sci-fi novelties. interesting concept but the game was meh.
It was fun, but it wasn't BF2 fun.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
Don't know why theres so many people posting their scores already. Wait a month so all those noobs you mow down have a good feel of the game and can actually fight back. Until then STFU unless you go 50-0. Actually no i used to 50-0 everyday when bf2 was 3 years old so make it 100-0.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6951
scsb.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
Don't know why theres so many people posting their scores already. Wait a month so all those noobs you mow down have a good feel of the game and can actually fight back. Until then STFU unless you go 50-0. Actually no i used to 50-0 everyday when bf2 was 3 years old so make it 100-0.
I played far more 2142 than BF2 and liked the "sci fi novelties". FAN THANThen again I am much more of a sci fi fan than a war/modern combat fan so maybe that is why. I also never played BF2 (or any game for that matter) competitively so maybe that is why I didnt have such a religious experience playing it.
I feel similarly Timmah, I bought 2142 first, didn't get BF2 untill I bought the complete edition after growing bored of 2142, which took quite some time...TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
I played far more 2142 than BF2 and liked the "sci fi novelties". FAN THANThen again I am much more of a sci fi fan than a war/modern combat fan so maybe that is why. I also never played BF2 (or any game for that matter) competitively so maybe that is why I didnt have such a religious experience playing it.
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-11-10 07:12:47)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
floppy you have bf3 yet?
Take a guess?jsnipy wrote:
floppy you have bf3 yet?
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
it was a very average game, and the gunplay felt really laboured and heavy. not very responsive.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
i'm guessing no?FloppY_ wrote:
Take a guess?jsnipy wrote:
floppy you have bf3 yet?
Choppers are pointless if theres an Tunguska around.
with more people having tv missiles mobile AA is becoming less effective. and now that I stopped trying to make use of the lousy AGM and switched to rockets I can take them out with a jet from a safer distance
Jets are not choppers.Christbane wrote:
with more people having tv missiles mobile AA is becoming less effective. and now that I stopped trying to make use of the lousy AGM and switched to rockets I can take them out with a jet from a safer distance
Pages: 1 … 398 399 400 401 402 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread