Pages: 1 2 3 4 … 8

 

2006-05-20 17:04:10
Skruples
Mod Incarnate
+234|6928

jonnykill wrote:

And what the fuck are you babbling about when you say capitalism and our economic system has nothing to offer you since your not white ? You have evey opputunity to kick ass as you see fit . Not a damn thing is stopping you . Now your just mad talking , you make no sense at all .
I think what he was trying to say is that the economic system in America heavily favors white people. Just look at the heads of almost any major corporation. Look at most of the people in high government office. Look at every president we've ever had. I'm not saying that this bias is implicit, it has alot more to do with sociology and history than it does with actual laws, but the difference is there. Now, moving on to 'mad talking'...

jonnykill wrote:

Wow I don't know where to even begin . Capitalism isn't American ? ooooooooook ....
Your right though socialism isn't anti-American but it just so happens that most anti-Americans living in America are socialists . Ever hear of Commie/ I mean California ? Holt mother of god if I had the time to write some of the things I've heard at a few business meeting out there and on off time . After hearing such shit let me put it this way . If there EVER is another Terrorist attack in the US I truly , no seriously , hope it is in California and I hope it takes most of the people living there out . And I'm not kidding . California is freaking communist central .
O...k then. So you want milllions of Americans to die because they disagree with you. Very nice. I suppose we should round up all the democrats and foreigners and stick them in camps while we're at it, so we can keep an eye on those unamerican sunsabitches. People like you are a disgrace to politics. You lump everyone who doesn't agree with you into one group and then decide you hate them. Why? What would happen if there werent two parties? History is full of countries that went over the edge because there was no one to check the leadership, and I'm afraid of the same thing happening in the U.S.

Major_spittle wrote:

Ok, Point well taken BUT I guess it depends on what defines a Liberal.  They openly call themselves Liberals and Progressives.  Thus to me they defined it.
You don't seem to be thinking about this very hard. I've seen quite a few lunatics that called themselves republicans and conservatives. Does that mean that every republican or conservative is a lunatic? No, it means there are stupid people who are conservatives, just as there are stupid people that are liberals. I dream of the day when people realize life isn't black and white and start to accept the opposite party; almost everyone is on the same side, they just disagree on what the best course of action for the country is.

Let the flames come. I embrace them.
2006-05-20 17:30:06
Home
Section.80
+447|7075|Seattle, Washington, USA

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Good job comprehending my post. Look he's not just a horrible dictator, he posed a serious nuclear threat, as well as terrorist threat, why do you not bring up those points?
Really? A serious nuclear threat? That's why we didn't find any nukes, right?

And a terrorist threat, where do you get that? You say he had connections to Al Qaeda and Bin laden. That's interesting, because according to our government, their investigation says that there was no collaboration between Saddam and Al-Qaeda or Saddam and Osama bin Laden.

And regarding the radio station, please do not let one small group of Liberals represent the whole group.

Last edited by Homeschtar (2006-05-20 17:30:59)

2006-05-20 17:41:19
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6879|USA

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Capt. Foley wrote:

Havent experienced this radio or w/e but I seriously hate liberals and there constanly critiziing the people that give them the rights to do the bs that they do.
Funniest thing about them, is the way they criticise Bush for EVERYTHING he does, but yet they never offer a better solution, or any solution for that matter. It's either he took to long, or it wasn't enough.
Well they do have a solution....they want to give up the sovereignty of the US for a global "why can't we all just get along" group hug. Ya know, the kinda world John Lennon was looking for before someone blew his frickin head off. The only problem with that is, while we are out trying to hug other countries they are picking our pockets and stabbing us in the back..
2006-05-20 18:08:32
ComradeWho
Member
+50|6922|Southern California

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Good job comprehending my post. Look he's not just a horrible dictator, he posed a serious nuclear threat, as well as terrorist threat, why do you not bring up those points?
the yellow cake intelligence was fabricated. he never posed a "nuclear" threat. he was thought to pose a chemical threat to the surrounding region because he didn't have long range capability. 

he never posed a "terrorist" threat because Al-Qaeda are religious extremists. Saddam Hussein was a secular dictator.  If you think that a dictator who's political survival is built on insuring that all of those who live in his country are scared hopeless, have no means of recourse against him, and are totally complacent.  it is absurd to think that Saddam Hussein would allow an armed guerilla group the freedom to train and organize within his country - especially any group with it's own personal aspirations for power and who trains people to fear God above all else. To make this claim even more absurd, before the Gulf War Al-Qaeda's main enemy was Saddam Hussein - they organized around the idea that "a muslim killing a muslim is a sin" and that since Saddam Hussein's rule was so secular he was unfit to rule.  The Bush administration preyed on the ignorance of the american public by saying that Saddam Hussein harbored terrorists because they knew our fellow citizens, yourself included, have a very poor understanding of these matters. congrats, sucker.

but hey.. "we fight em over there so we don't have to fight em here" right?

Last edited by ComradeWho (2006-05-20 18:23:24)

2006-05-20 18:14:27
ComradeWho
Member
+50|6922|Southern California

lowing wrote:

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Capt. Foley wrote:

Havent experienced this radio or w/e but I seriously hate liberals and there constanly critiziing the people that give them the rights to do the bs that they do.
Funniest thing about them, is the way they criticise Bush for EVERYTHING he does, but yet they never offer a better solution, or any solution for that matter. It's either he took to long, or it wasn't enough.
Well they do have a solution....they want to give up the sovereignty of the US for a global "why can't we all just get along" group hug. Ya know, the kinda world John Lennon was looking for before someone blew his frickin head off. The only problem with that is, while we are out trying to hug other countries they are picking our pockets and stabbing us in the back..
do you loyal, patriotic, jingoistic, militaristic, ignorant wal-mart shoppers ever have anything to contribute to political discourse that are not incoherent abstract ramblings? do your minds actually operate on the basis of false dichotomy's or are your minds just sort of sponges that soak up the dichotomy's presented to you by politicians who present your options in the way which guarantees the sustenance of their own power?

my impression of the last posts: "we HAVE to break the international laws that we've agreed to obey in the international governance organization that we created in which we hold more power than any other country and which we use to justify our action when convenient for us.. because if we don't we'll all be ruled by all the evil countries out there that hate us for our freedom. it's kill or be killed, co-operation is a tactic used by the naive and the weak. what i hate about liberals is that they are always bashing our militarism without realizing that our militarism is what has allowed them to do that, it makes me so sick to see people using the freedoms that our soldiers have died for them to use! nevermind that most of our freedoms were actually won by activists, scholars, and poor people against the militaristic self-serving government. and never mind that the majority of our wars (the ones we don't talk about so much) have been an excersize in the government shipping off our soldiers to protect the economic interests of the very wealthy - often in opposition to the self-rule of a foreign nation.  i've never heard of the abolitionist, labor, or women's movement i just know that in WW2 our soldiers beat nazis. when i watch fox news and it tells me that bush has a plan but that liberals don't like it i know that liberals in fact don't have a plan.. and if they did have a plan it would have to do with america being destroyed"

Last edited by ComradeWho (2006-05-20 18:21:49)

2006-05-20 18:52:25
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|7065
" Walmart shoppers" lol what a CockRat
2006-05-20 21:47:05
The_Mob_Returns
Member
+72|6949|Indianapolis, IN
Without liberals there would be no Republicans and without republicans there would be no liberals.  They co-exist.  They need each other to survive, without one the other couldn't bash them.  That is the reason I love politics, because there will never be a side that ultimately wins.
2006-05-20 21:51:00
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6879|USA

ComradeWho wrote:

lowing wrote:

psychotoxic187 wrote:


Funniest thing about them, is the way they criticise Bush for EVERYTHING he does, but yet they never offer a better solution, or any solution for that matter. It's either he took to long, or it wasn't enough.
Well they do have a solution....they want to give up the sovereignty of the US for a global "why can't we all just get along" group hug. Ya know, the kinda world John Lennon was looking for before someone blew his frickin head off. The only problem with that is, while we are out trying to hug other countries they are picking our pockets and stabbing us in the back..
do you loyal, patriotic, jingoistic, militaristic, ignorant wal-mart shoppers ever have anything to contribute to political discourse that are not incoherent abstract ramblings? do your minds actually operate on the basis of false dichotomy's or are your minds just sort of sponges that soak up the dichotomy's presented to you by politicians who present your options in the way which guarantees the sustenance of their own power?

my impression of the last posts: "we HAVE to break the international laws that we've agreed to obey in the international governance organization that we created in which we hold more power than any other country and which we use to justify our action when convenient for us.. because if we don't we'll all be ruled by all the evil countries out there that hate us for our freedom. it's kill or be killed, co-operation is a tactic used by the naive and the weak. what i hate about liberals is that they are always bashing our militarism without realizing that our militarism is what has allowed them to do that, it makes me so sick to see people using the freedoms that our soldiers have died for them to use! nevermind that most of our freedoms were actually won by activists, scholars, and poor people against the militaristic self-serving government. and never mind that the majority of our wars (the ones we don't talk about so much) have been an excersize in the government shipping off our soldiers to protect the economic interests of the very wealthy - often in opposition to the self-rule of a foreign nation.  i've never heard of the abolitionist, labor, or women's movement i just know that in WW2 our soldiers beat nazis. when i watch fox news and it tells me that bush has a plan but that liberals don't like it i know that liberals in fact don't have a plan.. and if they did have a plan it would have to do with america being destroyed"
I have absolutely no idea where you stand on this topic and I read it three times, putting commas in different places. I will say this though..........I bet dictionary.com got a terrific amount of hits tonight.
2006-05-20 21:51:59
kessel!
Peruvian Cocaine
+261|6992|Toronto Canada
wow, i am not even going to comment. typical conservatives
2006-05-20 22:49:52
BEE_Grim_Reaper
Member
+15|6934|Germany
I always wonder where this cornucopia of knowledge comes from.... I always see allegations.... but somehow I always miss some valid proof...
2006-05-21 07:52:17
IRONxWyvern
Member
+14|7068|Atlanta, GA
I love liberals that continue to Negative Karma me without any comments or the balls to sign their name to it.  Why is it that when their is a fundamental disagreement with their ideals they begin labeling those that disagree and take some bullshit action like giving you negative Karma without explaining why or saying who it is from.  This must be their deluded way of thinking that they are punishing me.  lol
2006-05-21 08:01:38
jonnykill
The Microwave Man
+235|6907
I'm an American . Some of the people who live in CA are anything but . They would actually rather see the US destroyed . Not just in a daydream but for real . You should hear these people . You would change your mind and give me +1 karma's all day if you did . Let's just say there are a ton of John walkers out there in CA and they are one step away from getting a flight to Syria to go on a Jihad to kill American troops , k ?
Anyhow your right though . Capitalism is a hierarchy . People who can barley manage a job at K-mart take care of the blue collar work and bitch and gripe . Then there are Farm owners who work twice as hard and have pride in doing so . Next we have the middle class who actually worked their ass off in college and got some job skills making good money and taking vacations . Then there are people who had everything given to them by their parents but still need to work hard to keep it . Then there are people who are talented and become rich quickly . Then there are people who are smart enough to make millions with piratically no job skills and training at all . Like the guy who made Napster .
So what what your point again ? You make it as if it's a bad thing . You have running water right ? You obviously have Internet . You have a car too ? 2 cars ? How about a house or an apartment ? Yes to all of these ? Then you have more then 1/3 of the people on the planet . Suck it up and drive on . At least you don't have to wait till 4AM to get water for the next day so you can't be seen by snipers . Cry me a river , build a bridge and get the fuck over it .
Thank you .
2006-05-21 19:32:31
mp30
Cynicism is an art, right?
+13|6958|It Rarely Rains in Seattle

The_Mob_Returns wrote:

Without liberals there would be no Republicans and without republicans there would be no liberals.  They co-exist.  They need each other to survive, without one the other couldn't bash them.  That is the reason I love politics, because there will never be a side that ultimately wins.
Careful there, true conservatives are in absolutely no comprehensible way a Republican, and Democrats are not liberals,well you could call notable Republicans moderate to the point of near liberalism, but not quite yet. As has been the case for several decades, and most obviously in the past ten years the political parties we know of today in the United States are virtually identical and share little or no true relationship to the political wings which they proclaim to be based under. They are moderate and accomidating to the point of having no true political identity, a mainstream example being the almost constant retorts of agreement I noticed during the Presidential debates of 2004(a vast generalization of the overwhelming aspect I felt during watching them, please don't assault me with specific examples unless they are encompassing enough to be relevant in a general sense), or even more importantly the Republican dominant Congress' inability to overcome the threats of a minority party during various appointments to several positions in the past year.

These Psuedo-conservatives that dominate the Republican party forced me to register as an Independent, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Along with the fact that in my state you essentially cannot vote in primaries unless you registered with a party, something I refuse to do; I may be conservative, but that will not limit me to voting the party line.
2006-05-21 23:34:09
Janysc
Member
+59|6911|Norway

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Janysc wrote:

psychotoxic187 wrote:


He's not just some horrible dictator. He's killed thousands of innocent people, had thousands of women raped. Like I said there are ties between him and Bin Laden, he was harboring Al Qaeda. We should take out any dictator that poses a nuclear threat or otherwise towards us, and any other place on earth.
Well, go on, take Iran and North Korea while you try to hold Islam down with your shaking boot.

I dare ya.

And which horrible dictator hasn't killed thousands of innocent people etc.? Isn't the fact that they do horrible stuff make them horrible? A dictator is a ruler who does not see the value of democracy, he doesn't necessarily rove around with a bloody sword and cackle at his impaled victims.

But hey, Iran's and North Korea's national leaders have some nukes down their chimneys, as well as some kick-ass criminal record. Go get 'em. See if your army can keep up with your president's words, being that you already send your mentally unstable and retired housewives to fight (the wonders of 60 Minutes).

Now let's greet the negative karma with open arms.
Good job comprehending my post. Look he's not just a horrible dictator, he posed a serious nuclear threat, as well as terrorist threat, why do you not bring up those points? As far as Iran is concerned, they are weak, but yet they demand we follow their teachings or else. You keep forgetting it's the UN that's also going after Iran, and Korea, not just the US.


Where in the hell do you see retired houswives in the military? Boy if that's not ignorance I don't know what is. Our military is the best trained in the world, next Britain. You'd be a fool to think we cannot bring the fight, and back up our commander in chiefs words.
I saw a lady of fifty years in training on 60 Minutes. Her rifle was as tall as she, and she's going down there to fight. Actually, she's down there now. So, either you "don't know what it is", or "OMG, 60 Minutes is liberal propaganda". No objection to mentally unstable goons? Good! Proves I'm right then.
And from what I hear from about every American official I see on the news, the war is highly ineconomical (as with all wars), and volunteers aren't exactly flocking to fight for their country (can't blame them though, war is terrible).
Oh, Saddam caused a nuclear threat? You didn't have proof, just speculations and flashy satelites. And turns out they didn't have those weapons. They did what the UN told them to. North Korea HAS nukes. They hate America (and force their population to grow opium, as well as to starve them). Get them.
As for terrorist threats, sure. They were there. And they are. You were right about that. At least.

I call it quits here. Why, you ask? I can see where this is going, I've gotten the pointless negative karma to prove it (whoo!), AND I have way better things to do, like spending time with my loved ones. Boy, how wonderful life becomes when you're doing physics.

Cheerio, cheerio, bye-bye.
2006-05-22 00:25:59
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|6995
Come on, to group all liberals into 1 category of crackpots, anti American, etc  is just as ridiculous as saying that all conservatives are Christian KKK members.

-Iraq never had nuclear weapons and never will. The “Yellow cake uranium Niger” story was a complete fabrication, as was the mobile chemical labs, as was WMD…..

-Yes, Saddam is a bad man torturing, killing etc. Don’t forget the US torture people as well i.e. Abu Ghraib, The US fly people to places like Jordan and Egypt (commonly called rendition flights ) where they can freely torture without being watched over.

-BTW you had the chance to remove Saddam after Gulf War 1…and YOU DID NOT!!!

-There may have been terrorists in Iraq…there are terrorists in every country and more and more are being created everyday. For every civilian killed in Iraq you possibly create another suicide bomber.

-But who is next?? Robert Mugabe – he is a bad man, Mobutu Sese Seko - he executed his political rivals, China is a dictatorship – want a crack at them, Nth Korea – come on, have a go.

-Some of you talk about Saddam killing innocent civilians – how many innocent civilians have died because of this war in Iraq? Isn’t your commander in chief responsible for that?

-There is NO link between Iraq and 9/11 and anyone who says so is just plain wrong. Ask Rummy himself
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq … -911_x.htm

For further reading use google and search the following:  “downing street memo”, “valerie plame + niger + joseph Wilson”.

And ever further reading:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WMDlies.html
2006-05-22 02:46:48
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6789

jonnykill wrote:

Stalin did have the rioght idea but we just need to apply it to all the liberals . Round them up , kill them all , problems sovled
That's funny, because Communists were liberals.  Stalin didn't round up liberals.  He rounded up dissenters.  That includes conservative military types who just plain didn't like him.
2006-05-22 07:26:53
Nintendogamer
Member
+72|6815|Chelmsford, UK
Liberals aren't racist, thats Nationalists, (BNP) i'm liberal and i'm nto racist.
2006-05-22 07:45:08
skratch-x
Member
+25|6864|NY, USA

Nintendogamer wrote:

Liberals aren't racist, thats Nationalists, (BNP) i'm liberal and i'm nto racist.
No, no.  I think you're just confused.  A bunch of fucktards convinced me all liberals are racist and whatever else they said, so you're obviously racist and I am too.  O_O
2006-05-22 08:05:40
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6999|PNW

Confusion is caused by the blanket descriptive terms "liberal" and "conservative," expecially when, far from accurately dividing political camps in the US, fail utterly when trying to sort out international politics.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-05-22 08:07:09)

2006-05-22 08:11:35
Quacki
Member
+9|6959

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Like invading Iraq to prevent terrorism and WMD was a solution in the first place.








That is what someone wrote when they gave me -karma. Are you mental? Have the balls to come in here and debate, not be a immature child. That is the reason we are there. Theres ties from Sadam to Bin Laden, he was harboring terroists, and did you forget about 9/11? Not to mention this guy had rape, and torture rooms set up every where, he's a sick POS who deserves to die.
Hi, it's me, the dreaded negative karma bringer.
I am not going to debate you here, simply because english is not my first language. I am also a lazy guy. Discussing on the net would take too much time for me. I don't think anything I could say would change anything you believe in. You say there are ties between Saddam and Al-Quaeda? As someone else pointed out, thats nonsense. Saddams Baath Party was secular and nationalistic, not religious fundamentalistic like those Al-Quaeda guys. I have read that Al-Quaeda was more of a threat to Saddam, because it could take away his followers, diminshing his own power.

Regarding the terrorists in Iraq, the invasion of Iraq led to it's occupation, and I think it is totally normal for people to resist such a situation. Islamic terrorists took the opportunity and went into Iraq. Only after the invasion terrorists began to appear there.
And WMD were never found in Iraq, most propable because they were not there.
I always hoped when the invasion became inevitable that it would turn out well, quick war, no big losses on both sides, and so on. Well, that was the case, but the situation in Iraq now is very bad and will get even worse. The invasion was not justificated right, and the real reason to go there were oil and geopolitical ambitions, like a base for further wars in the middle east (like a possible war against Iran). That alienates many other countries all over the world from the US, and saying Saddam had rape rooms won't get you any sympathies back.
2006-05-22 08:48:54
jonnykill
The Microwave Man
+235|6907

BN wrote:

Come on, to group all liberals into 1 category of crackpots, anti American, etc  is just as ridiculous as saying that all conservatives are Christian KKK members.

-Iraq never had nuclear weapons and never will. The “Yellow cake uranium Niger” story was a complete fabrication, as was the mobile chemical labs, as was WMD…..

-Yes, Saddam is a bad man torturing, killing etc. Don’t forget the US torture people as well i.e. Abu Ghraib, The US fly people to places like Jordan and Egypt (commonly called rendition flights ) where they can freely torture without being watched over.

-BTW you had the chance to remove Saddam after Gulf War 1…and YOU DID NOT!!!

-There may have been terrorists in Iraq…there are terrorists in every country and more and more are being created everyday. For every civilian killed in Iraq you possibly create another suicide bomber.

-But who is next?? Robert Mugabe – he is a bad man, Mobutu Sese Seko - he executed his political rivals, China is a dictatorship – want a crack at them, Nth Korea – come on, have a go.

-Some of you talk about Saddam killing innocent civilians – how many innocent civilians have died because of this war in Iraq? Isn’t your commander in chief responsible for that?

-There is NO link between Iraq and 9/11 and anyone who says so is just plain wrong. Ask Rummy himself
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq … -911_x.htm

For further reading use google and search the following:  “downing street memo”, “valerie plame + niger + joseph Wilson”.

And ever further reading:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WMDlies.html
You said Saddam never had WMD , what about the 6,000 kurds killed with nerve gas ?
2006-05-22 16:13:38
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|6995

jonnykill wrote:

BN wrote:

Come on, to group all liberals into 1 category of crackpots, anti American, etc  is just as ridiculous as saying that all conservatives are Christian KKK members.

-Iraq never had nuclear weapons and never will. The “Yellow cake uranium Niger” story was a complete fabrication, as was the mobile chemical labs, as was WMD…..

-Yes, Saddam is a bad man torturing, killing etc. Don’t forget the US torture people as well i.e. Abu Ghraib, The US fly people to places like Jordan and Egypt (commonly called rendition flights ) where they can freely torture without being watched over.

-BTW you had the chance to remove Saddam after Gulf War 1…and YOU DID NOT!!!

-There may have been terrorists in Iraq…there are terrorists in every country and more and more are being created everyday. For every civilian killed in Iraq you possibly create another suicide bomber.

-But who is next?? Robert Mugabe – he is a bad man, Mobutu Sese Seko - he executed his political rivals, China is a dictatorship – want a crack at them, Nth Korea – come on, have a go.

-Some of you talk about Saddam killing innocent civilians – how many innocent civilians have died because of this war in Iraq? Isn’t your commander in chief responsible for that?

-There is NO link between Iraq and 9/11 and anyone who says so is just plain wrong. Ask Rummy himself
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq … -911_x.htm

For further reading use google and search the following:  “downing street memo”, “valerie plame + niger + joseph Wilson”.

And ever further reading:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WMDlies.html
You said Saddam never had WMD , what about the 6,000 kurds killed with nerve gas ?
I was referring to the non-existant chemical weapons that we were taken to War for. Saddam he gassed them back in 1988. Why was he not punished then? BTW it was 5000 Kurds, not 6000
2006-05-22 18:37:13
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6879|USA

Skruples wrote:

jonnykill wrote:

And what the fuck are you babbling about when you say capitalism and our economic system has nothing to offer you since your not white ? You have evey opputunity to kick ass as you see fit . Not a damn thing is stopping you . Now your just mad talking , you make no sense at all .
I think what he was trying to say is that the economic system in America heavily favors white people. Just look at the heads of almost any major corporation. Look at most of the people in high government office. Look at every president we've ever had. I'm not saying that this bias is implicit, it has alot more to do with sociology and history than it does with actual laws, but the difference is there. Now, moving on to 'mad talking'...
yes, poor Oprah, and Colin Powell, and Condeleeza Rice, and Mayor Ray Nagin, and that phycho bitch Cynthea McKinney, and Bill Cosby and about 95% of the NBA, and NFL and MBL, or, Astronauts Frederick Gregory,Ronald McNair, Bernard Harrisboy, Guion Bluford, Mae C. Jemison, Michael Anderson. I could go on and on.....but you sure are right, a black person just can't catch a break in America.
2006-05-22 18:59:29
Skruples
Mod Incarnate
+234|6928

lowing wrote:

Skruples wrote:

jonnykill wrote:

And what the fuck are you babbling about when you say capitalism and our economic system has nothing to offer you since your not white ? You have evey opputunity to kick ass as you see fit . Not a damn thing is stopping you . Now your just mad talking , you make no sense at all .
I think what he was trying to say is that the economic system in America heavily favors white people. Just look at the heads of almost any major corporation. Look at most of the people in high government office. Look at every president we've ever had. I'm not saying that this bias is implicit, it has alot more to do with sociology and history than it does with actual laws, but the difference is there. Now, moving on to 'mad talking'...
yes, poor Oprah, and Colin Powell, and Condeleeza Rice, and Mayor Ray Nagin, and that phycho bitch Cynthea McKinney, and Bill Cosby and about 95% of the NBA, and NFL and MBL, or, Astronauts Frederick Gregory,Ronald McNair, Bernard Harrisboy, Guion Bluford, Mae C. Jemison, Michael Anderson. I could go on and on.....but you sure are right, a black person just can't catch a break in America.
Where in my original statement did I mention black people in specific? Anyway, I'm not going to argue with you, because I have found that doing so is a waste of my already mostly worthless time.
2006-05-22 19:17:36
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6879|USA

Skruples wrote:

lowing wrote:

Skruples wrote:

I think what he was trying to say is that the economic system in America heavily favors white people. Just look at the heads of almost any major corporation. Look at most of the people in high government office. Look at every president we've ever had. I'm not saying that this bias is implicit, it has alot more to do with sociology and history than it does with actual laws, but the difference is there. Now, moving on to 'mad talking'...
yes, poor Oprah, and Colin Powell, and Condeleeza Rice, and Mayor Ray Nagin, and that phycho bitch Cynthea McKinney, and Bill Cosby and about 95% of the NBA, and NFL and MBL, or, Astronauts Frederick Gregory,Ronald McNair, Bernard Harrisboy, Guion Bluford, Mae C. Jemison, Michael Anderson. I could go on and on.....but you sure are right, a black person just can't catch a break in America.
Where in my original statement did I mention black people in specific? Anyway, I'm not going to argue with you, because I have found that doing so is a waste of my already mostly worthless time.
you talked about favoring "white people" as in disfavoring minorites, and the black population is the MAJOR minority in this country,or is that NOT what you meant?? I could give hispanic examples if you prefer. But you are right about one thing, it is hopeless for you to argue a point that can be punched full of holes so easily.

Last edited by lowing (2006-05-22 19:26:56)

 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 … 8

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard