xcocks, sorryToilet Sex wrote:
Ps3?Finray wrote:
pretty exciting life mate
going to cammy's, he wants to get mw3 at midnight release. Figured it'd be an alright way to spend a night, chillin with my bro and his flatmates with a few beers and some mw3.
my friend's going with her dad for it, might ask her to pick me up a copy too :0
why 2 over 4?Uzique wrote:
1 (and expansion) > 2 > 4 > nothing else counts
that's unfortunateFinray wrote:
xcocks, sorryToilet Sex wrote:
Ps3?Finray wrote:
pretty exciting life mate
going to cammy's, he wants to get mw3 at midnight release. Figured it'd be an alright way to spend a night, chillin with my bro and his flatmates with a few beers and some mw3.
my friend's going with her dad for it, might ask her to pick me up a copy too :0
Uzique wrote:
1 (and expansion) > nothing else counts
let me know if that happensFinray wrote:
my sister plays mw2 all the time on the ps3 we have here, so she might get my dad to get it for her, we could play then
i ain't giving any more money to activision for shite though.
yuck. I have never had one...never will. There is something unsettling about the McRib...isn't it banned in Europe? It has some chemical in it that they use in gym mats and shoe soles. Not the most appetizing thing in the world.Jay wrote:
Just had my annual McRib. Disgusting as always. Can't believe I fall for the advertising every year
unless you eat gym mats and shoe solestuckergustav wrote:
yuck. I have never had one...never will. There is something unsettling about the McRib...isn't it banned in Europe? It has some chemical in it that they use in gym mats and shoe soles. Not the most appetizing thing in the world.Jay wrote:
Just had my annual McRib. Disgusting as always. Can't believe I fall for the advertising every year
because 2 still required a modicum of skill to play; it still had rifle-only and decent guns and classes that you actually had to LEARN to play, rather than just using the generic 'best weapon set-up for everything' that the console modern warfare games ushered in; because the maps were good and had way more replayability than the cod4 maps; because 2 still kept things like recoil and refined movement, instead of ezemode aim for all guns and clunky console bullshit. cod2 was still a pc game. cod4 was alreay half-way past the point of no return, and had to be heavily modded to be even playable at a high-skill level.nukchebi0 wrote:
why 2 over 4?Uzique wrote:
1 (and expansion) > 2 > 4 > nothing else counts
Last edited by Uzique (2011-11-07 13:11:24)
Are you assessing solely from an MP perspective?Uzique wrote:
because 2 still required a modicum of skill to play; it still had rifle-only and decent guns and classes that you actually had to LEARN to play, rather than just using the generic 'best weapon set-up for everything' that the console modern warfare games ushered in; because the maps were good and had way more replayability than the cod4 maps; because 2 still kept things like recoil and refined movement, instead of ezemode aim for all guns and clunky console bullshit. cod2 was still a pc game. cod4 was alreay half-way past the point of no return, and had to be heavily modded to be even playable at a high-skill level.nukchebi0 wrote:
why 2 over 4?Uzique wrote:
1 (and expansion) > 2 > 4 > nothing else counts
Lack of sprint made 2 just not fun after 'growing up' on 4. Still a lot of fun to play though.Uzique wrote:
because 2 still required a modicum of skill to play; it still had rifle-only and decent guns and classes that you actually had to LEARN to play, rather than just using the generic 'best weapon set-up for everything' that the console modern warfare games ushered in; because the maps were good and had way more replayability than the cod4 maps; because 2 still kept things like recoil and refined movement, instead of ezemode aim for all guns and clunky console bullshit. cod2 was still a pc game. cod4 was alreay half-way past the point of no return, and had to be heavily modded to be even playable at a high-skill level.nukchebi0 wrote:
why 2 over 4?Uzique wrote:
1 (and expansion) > 2 > 4 > nothing else counts
are you retarded? i didn't play call of duty single player professionally.nukchebi0 wrote:
Are you assessing solely from an MP perspective?Uzique wrote:
because 2 still required a modicum of skill to play; it still had rifle-only and decent guns and classes that you actually had to LEARN to play, rather than just using the generic 'best weapon set-up for everything' that the console modern warfare games ushered in; because the maps were good and had way more replayability than the cod4 maps; because 2 still kept things like recoil and refined movement, instead of ezemode aim for all guns and clunky console bullshit. cod2 was still a pc game. cod4 was alreay half-way past the point of no return, and had to be heavily modded to be even playable at a high-skill level.nukchebi0 wrote:
why 2 over 4?
it's called using a pistol and having a clueFinray wrote:
Lack of sprint made 2 just not fun after 'growing up' on 4. Still a lot of fun to play though.Uzique wrote:
because 2 still required a modicum of skill to play; it still had rifle-only and decent guns and classes that you actually had to LEARN to play, rather than just using the generic 'best weapon set-up for everything' that the console modern warfare games ushered in; because the maps were good and had way more replayability than the cod4 maps; because 2 still kept things like recoil and refined movement, instead of ezemode aim for all guns and clunky console bullshit. cod2 was still a pc game. cod4 was alreay half-way past the point of no return, and had to be heavily modded to be even playable at a high-skill level.nukchebi0 wrote:
why 2 over 4?
