This game looks like the bomb diggy. I loved San Andreas only played a bit of GTAIV it felt tedious for some reason. Might see if I can pick it up for cheap.
I thought that came out last year LOL
The license plates say San Andreas because no cities issue their own plates, in the GTA universe, San Andreas is the state in which Los Santos (and the other two cities from GTA:SA) resides, that's why it says San Andreas and not Los Santos...Poseidon wrote:
They did... although Las Venturas could be essentially a side portion of Los Santos, with Los Santos being just a gigantic city. If the license plates say "San Andreas" as they do however, it doesn't really make much sense to have LV in the main game. Perhaps they'll add those cities in through DLC much like TLAD and TBOGT._j5689_ wrote:
Didn't Rockstar themselves say that the game was only going to be Los Santos, this must be an old San Andreas map or something
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Yeah, just like the plates in Liberty City also said the sta--FloppY_ wrote:
The license plates say San Andreas because no cities issue their own plates, in the GTA universe, San Andreas is the state in which Los Santos (and the other two cities from GTA:SA) resides, that's why it says San Andreas and not Los Santos...Poseidon wrote:
They did... although Las Venturas could be essentially a side portion of Los Santos, with Los Santos being just a gigantic city. If the license plates say "San Andreas" as they do however, it doesn't really make much sense to have LV in the main game. Perhaps they'll add those cities in through DLC much like TLAD and TBOGT._j5689_ wrote:
Didn't Rockstar themselves say that the game was only going to be Los Santos, this must be an old San Andreas map or something
Oh wait..
Almost scary to think it came out in 2004. I remember getting it on release day.
dude i remember when VC got released, my mate had it delivered to his house and i was going to his after school, played it together for about 4 or 5 hours, we were 12.Poseidon wrote:
Yeah, just like the plates in Liberty City also said the sta--FloppY_ wrote:
The license plates say San Andreas because no cities issue their own plates, in the GTA universe, San Andreas is the state in which Los Santos (and the other two cities from GTA:SA) resides, that's why it says San Andreas and not Los Santos...Poseidon wrote:
They did... although Las Venturas could be essentially a side portion of Los Santos, with Los Santos being just a gigantic city. If the license plates say "San Andreas" as they do however, it doesn't really make much sense to have LV in the main game. Perhaps they'll add those cities in through DLC much like TLAD and TBOGT.
Oh wait..Almost scary to think it came out in 2004. I remember getting it on release day.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
VC was 2002 right? I was 10. I still remember that mission where you dress like a cop and blow up a store in the mall. Then of course the moonshine mission in the humvee.
I didn't even know what movie it was mostly referencing until I was like 14 lol
I didn't even know what movie it was mostly referencing until I was like 14 lol
Dear god, reminicing about gta 3, VC, & SA is some of the best video gaming times in my life. I was so //_- about the meh that was gta4, hopefully 5 can make me all ^_^ again
I still don't get the hate over GTA IV. Was it more realistic and serious? Yeah.. but you could still have a shitload of fun in free roam MP. I've probably played over 60 hours of the MP free roam with people. 30 of those being krazed
I'll admit I'm a GTA fanboy though. Favorite series of all time by far. Hard for me to criticize a game series I love so much.
I'll admit I'm a GTA fanboy though. Favorite series of all time by far. Hard for me to criticize a game series I love so much.
Last edited by Poseidon (2011-11-05 12:10:39)
For a serious game it had some hillarious results playing with the physics engine...
swingsets / negative vehicle friction / just cruising around having a blast
swingsets / negative vehicle friction / just cruising around having a blast
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-11-05 12:15:29)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
GTA4 was awesome.
I knew it wouldn't be DC as soon as the narrator in the trailer said something about "good weather" lawl
I knew it wouldn't be DC as soon as the narrator in the trailer said something about "good weather" lawl
I just hope they bring back the Army, nothing like being chased by tanks.
Or pointing the barrel to the rear and fire continuously to make it go twice as fast while blowing up cops dumb enough to chase a tankHurricane2k9 wrote:
I just hope they bring back the Army, nothing like being chased by tanks.
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
That was so awesome
My thoughts exactly. EFLC (TBoGT, namely) added a lot of the over-the-top style action that everyone wanted, that still fits with the setting/mood of the game, and is a lot of fun.Poseidon wrote:
I still don't get the hate over GTA IV. Was it more realistic and serious? Yeah.. but you could still have a shitload of fun in free roam MP. I've probably played over 60 hours of the MP free roam with people. 30 of those being krazed
I'll admit I'm a GTA fanboy though. Favorite series of all time by far. Hard for me to criticize a game series I love so much.
I'm a big GTA fanboy too.
Maybe that was in part because they were the firsts of their kind?Eagle wrote:
Dear god, reminicing about gta 3, VC, & SA is some of the best video gaming times in my life. I was so //_- about the meh that was gta4, hopefully 5 can make me all ^_^ again
I'm glad it sounds like they've listened to the feedback where people said they wanted more of the features that were in SA but not IV
Indeedbennisboy wrote:
I'm glad it sounds like they've listened to the feedback where people said they wanted more of the features that were in SA but not IV
All the features they claim to return brings back memories of how great those features were in the older games and how much I missed them in GTA IV
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I still want the realism since it looks more realistic, I hope they don't add too many completely ridiculous features
Yeah as long as what they add fits with the story and setting, I'm all for it. SA's crazy stuff (jetpacks, airplanes, attack helicopters) were a lot of fun but didn't really fit the sort of gangster type story they were seemingly going with._j5689_ wrote:
I still want the realism since it looks more realistic, I hope they don't add too many completely ridiculous features
That's why TBOGT was so fucking awesome. It was over the top (parachuting out of a recently exploded private jet to the Unisphere in Dukes), but still managed to keep a level of somewhat realism.
Hopefully, GTAV takes that path. And so far, considering it both deals with the economy and has fucking fighter jets, it looks like it will.
Hopefully, GTAV takes that path. And so far, considering it both deals with the economy and has fucking fighter jets, it looks like it will.
Yeah, I loved what TBoGT added, I actually mainly play that one for everything because it just felt like it was a more complete version of the game what with the SWAT tank, and the return of the parachutes(Whoever initially nixed those needs to be fired, and it's still pretty inconvenient that they aren't automatically given to you in most, if not all, aircraft), and the new addition of nightclubs and being able to actually use the waterfront driving range as another minigame instead of it just being a gigantic but very good looking boat/helicopter obstacle. I also liked how the colors seemed more vivid than vanilla GTA IV and far better than the lifeless grainy-looking grey color of everything in TLaD
And I liked how bizarre it was too in a GTA type of way but still keeping it realistic like the rest of the game. If they took that type of approach with GTA V, I would still love it, but I think the craziness of GTA:SA won't belong in this new more realistic looking age of Grand Theft Auto.
And I liked how bizarre it was too in a GTA type of way but still keeping it realistic like the rest of the game. If they took that type of approach with GTA V, I would still love it, but I think the craziness of GTA:SA won't belong in this new more realistic looking age of Grand Theft Auto.
Last edited by _j5689_ (2011-11-06 22:32:52)
I hope they put in a civilian/retired police interceptor version of the Crown Victoria since I have one in RL, they'd probably call it the King Henry or some other British king name like Edward or James
So far all 3D GTAs except VC have had some form of Crown Victoria clone as the default Taxi & Police interceptor, GTA IV had two versions, the impala and the Crown Vic. It was also available as a civilian car in GTA SA called "Premier"..._j5689_ wrote:
I hope they put in a civilian/retired police interceptor version of the Crown Victoria since I have one in RL, they'd probably call it the King Henry or some other British king name like Edward or James
GTA III
GTA SA
GTA IV
I don't see a reason to change the tradition unless they decide to go for those modern concepts recently introduced or the impala from GTA IV...
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-11-07 12:37:53)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
do it
