jord
Member
+2,382|6648|The North, beyond the wall.

Poseidon wrote:

jord wrote:

sorted, now on to island 2

loading................................................................


Yeah no thanks finray dont ever become a developer.
You do know they did that in Vice City for the PS2, right?
I'm well aware, I've completed all the GTA's at least twice since GTA3.

The point is, nowadays nobody wants to go back to that.
Stimey
­
+786|6090|Ontario | Canada
­
­
­
­
­
­
Stimey
­
+786|6090|Ontario | Canada
­
­
­
­
­
­
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6687|Riva, MD

Stimey wrote:

http://games.ign.com/articles/121/1211494p1.html
Look at all the comments, how can people really be this upset about it being only Los Santos?  They've already said they're completely redesigning it and it's supposed to be their biggest map ever, meaning bigger than Liberty City in GTA IV, and this is on a map where the space probably isn't going to have a shitload of its area wasted by river water like Liberty City did.  AND planes are back, so the map has to be big anyway for them to feel like they're worth something.  AND it's Grand Theft fucking Auto 5

People are so stupid

Making Los Santos its own entity also means the other two cities may become they're own entities in the future, which means more city options instead of having to alternate between just Liberty City, San Andreas, and Vice City.  Although personally I never want to see Vice City again, I didn't like it that much for some reason.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5758|Catherine Black

Poseidon wrote:

Finray wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


You do know they did that in Vice City for the PS2, right?
And GTA3 and GTA:SA and I think for the top down GTAs, but I can't remember
I only remember them in VC. You'd be driving across the bridge (or flying, whichever) and a loading screen would appear for a good 8-10 seconds. Of course, the bridge was only unlocked after a certain point because of the "hurricane", but it definitely occurred.
Yeah exactly and nobody gave a fuck, I'd much rather have 10 seconds every 20 minutes than shit graphics all the time.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6687|Riva, MD

Finray wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Finray wrote:

And GTA3 and GTA:SA and I think for the top down GTAs, but I can't remember
I only remember them in VC. You'd be driving across the bridge (or flying, whichever) and a loading screen would appear for a good 8-10 seconds. Of course, the bridge was only unlocked after a certain point because of the "hurricane", but it definitely occurred.
Yeah exactly and nobody gave a fuck, I'd much rather have 10 seconds every 20 minutes than shit graphics all the time.
Most of us would prefer them not to come back.

And fortunately GTA V doesn't have shitty graphics or load screens as far as we know
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,736|6707|Oxferd Ohire
i hope theres more car variety. <3 cars
also. r8

Last edited by RTHKI (2011-11-03 14:08:52)

https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
jord
Member
+2,382|6648|The North, beyond the wall.

Finray wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Finray wrote:


And GTA3 and GTA:SA and I think for the top down GTAs, but I can't remember
I only remember them in VC. You'd be driving across the bridge (or flying, whichever) and a loading screen would appear for a good 8-10 seconds. Of course, the bridge was only unlocked after a certain point because of the "hurricane", but it definitely occurred.
Yeah exactly and nobody gave a fuck, I'd much rather have 10 seconds every 20 minutes than shit graphics all the time.
Yeah nobody gave a fuck because that was the norm 10 years ago. I'm pretty sure popular opinion is loading screens are something of the past, and they should stay there.

You're making gta4 graphics out to be terrible, they weren't.

Stop it finray, revise your posting style please.
TopHat01
Limitless
+117|5874|CA
Expected release?  I'm thinking either summer 2012 (to match with the setting) or the traditional October release date they always hit (minus GTA IV, which released in April).  Probably tell us a summer release, then delay it to fall, in typical Rockstar fashion.
Stimey
­
+786|6090|Ontario | Canada
I've heard May 24th, but thats just because 2405 pops up in the trailer once or twice so I'm skeptical.
­
­
­
­
­
­
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5758|Catherine Black

jord wrote:

You're making gta4 graphics out to be terrible, they weren't.
They were

_j5689_ wrote:

And fortunately GTA V doesn't have shitty graphics
Yes it does
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Eagle
Togs8896 is my evil alter ego
+567|6601|New Hampshire, USA

Finray wrote:

jord wrote:

You're making gta4 graphics out to be terrible, they weren't.
They were

_j5689_ wrote:

And fortunately GTA V doesn't have shitty graphics
Yes it does
Geeze I would love to see your graphical standard
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/14407/Sig_Pats.jpg
menzo
̏̏̏̏̏̏̏̏&#
+616|6416|Amsterdam‫
https://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee37/menzo2003/fredbf2.png
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,736|6707|Oxferd Ohire
san andreas had shit graphics for the time. 4 does not
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
bennisboy
Member
+829|6616|Poundland
Finray is a retard. SA had poorish graphics, yet it was easily one of the best games I've ever played. Graphics mean little when it comes to GTA
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,736|6707|Oxferd Ohire
truth^
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
jord
Member
+2,382|6648|The North, beyond the wall.

bennisboy wrote:

Finray is a retard. SA had poorish graphics, yet it was easily one of the best games I've ever played. Graphics mean little when it comes to GTA
i heard dat!
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5758|Catherine Black

menzo wrote:

GTA SA vs V

http://imgur.com/a/yk77n
Did you really just compare a game from 2004 to one from 2008? lol

RTHKI wrote:

san andreas had shit graphics for the time. 4 does not
I disagree, San Andreas had pretty good graphics for 2004, especially on PC.

bennisboy wrote:

Finray is a retard. SA had poorish graphics, yet it was easily one of the best games I've ever played. Graphics mean little when it comes to GTA
Oh, I agree, graphics mean very little to a game like that. It's just one of my pet peeves, everyone hailed GTA:IV for being extensively photo-realistic, I just couldn't see it. Low quality textures, complete lack of anti-aliasing, people and cars felt like completely separate entities from the landscape, not to mention clothes on people looked absolutely woeful when viewed from under 10 feet. I do agree GTA:IV had a massive city and was pretty good in that sense, but for graphical prowess? No. Crysis came out a year earlier, and looked so much better, whilst requiring MUCH less in the way of hardware, and still having that massive landscape.

Last edited by Finray (2011-11-04 06:46:45)

https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,736|6707|Oxferd Ohire
lol
no

like flolpsy ur wrong
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5758|Catherine Black
hey rick stop being a prick and actually comp up with some compelling arguments or evidence
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Sturgeon
Member
+488|4911|Flintshire

Finray wrote:

menzo wrote:

GTA SA vs V

http://imgur.com/a/yk77n
Did you really just compare a game from 2004 to one from 2008? lol
V is gonna be 2012, and he compared them because they're set in the same location

https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5758|Catherine Black
I had a bit of a brain fart, I was thinking that was from IV.

E: Well it essentially is, same engine, and I can't see them doing a major graphical overhaul.

Last edited by Finray (2011-11-04 07:15:08)

https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Sturgeon
Member
+488|4911|Flintshire
As long as the gameplay is in line with SA/Vice city I'll happily buy it
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
jord
Member
+2,382|6648|The North, beyond the wall.

Sturgeon wrote:

As long as the gameplay is in line with SA/Vice city I'll happily buy it
SAME
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|5758|Catherine Black
I won't buy it cause it'll never run on my computer, but I'll prolly torrent it.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard