AussieReaper wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
People who torrent stuff are receiving a product without paying for it against the wishes of the owner. That is pretty much stealing.
What exactly am I stealing here?
The reason we have copyrights (and patents) is to secure profits for the creator, and thus secure the incentive to create.
If I had a machine that could duplicate any car, absolutely free of charge, and I bought a Porsche, duplicated it an infinite amount of times and distributed it freely to everyone in the world, would:
A) Porsche reap the rewards of all the man-hours they've put in to design this car? No.
B) Porsche expect future innovative projects to be profitable? No.
C) Porsche continue to work on creating new cars? No.
Yes, oversimplified as music is an art-form which means it's not completely driven by profits, but still. They are the creators, they have the right to earn from their creation, piracy is hindering that. If piracy was at its extreme, any album would only ever sell a single CD. Is that fair to the amount of work they put into it?
With your example, you're only looking at production costs of the CD and completely ignoring the production cost of the music (man-hours put in to writing, creating, etc.)
Last edited by Jenspm (2011-11-03 03:39:43)