64 player operation metro is a huge rocket, grenade, revive spamfest. Is it worse than Karkand?
Poll
What spam is worse?
| Operation Metro 64 player BF3 | 78% | 78% - 29 | ||||
| Strike at Karkand 64 Player BF2 | 16% | 16% - 6 | ||||
| Equally as bad | 5% | 5% - 2 | ||||
| Total: 37 | ||||||
At least in karkand you could have the one sneaky squad leader make it to another flag well behind the main cluster fuck.
With Metro, there's what, 2 escalators and a flight of stairs?
If you can break through that spam it's very rare.
With Metro, there's what, 2 escalators and a flight of stairs?
If you can break through that spam it's very rare.
metro for sure. Like AR said in karkand you could open up a flag behind the alleyspam. Metro you just run into them.
Strike at Karkand 64 Player BF2 in IO was worse (grenades)
metro far worse. then again most times i played karkand io i was in the squad trying to sneak by
Metro for sure, Karkand it was piss easy to get around the nadespam if you had half an ounce of sense.
On the other hand, I barely see Metro played, which is a plus.
On the other hand, I barely see Metro played, which is a plus.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
The retarded amount of grenade spam in Karkand was an annoyance at best compared to Metro.
Metro is a fundamentally flawed map in many ways. Damavand Peak has an obvious choke point in the midst of the map, but the way it's designed lets the battle flow through and around most obstacles in that area. Metro has 2 ways past B, that fill up with about 20-30 spammers apiece.
Two times playing that since beta, and I've declared it my first, and probably only, quit-on-sight map for BF3...
Metro is a fundamentally flawed map in many ways. Damavand Peak has an obvious choke point in the midst of the map, but the way it's designed lets the battle flow through and around most obstacles in that area. Metro has 2 ways past B, that fill up with about 20-30 spammers apiece.
Two times playing that since beta, and I've declared it my first, and probably only, quit-on-sight map for BF3...
I enjoy the points that you get in metro though C:
i died abot 50 bajillion times in metro. but really it was only 5
Metro is only good for leveling up kits/guns to be honest. I slap on my medic kit and lets the points come to me.
Metro is all about extended mags + INV on the M249.
At 64, metro is spam to the max. At 32, if you can get them focused on a two of the three points, they rarely have enough to cover all three and you can manage to sneak by with a good squad and some smokes. Take their back flag and mess up there day. Did it just now, quite fun.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6921
their*
Karkand was a pretty serious cluster fuck. At both the Hotel and the bridge. But le Metro est le merde.
Karkand was a pretty serious cluster fuck. At both the Hotel and the bridge. But le Metro est le merde.
Last edited by Superior Mind (2011-10-30 22:32:00)
With Metro they were like, "Hey, people love epic firefights down corridors, so why not make an entire level based on a corridor!? FUCKING AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6921
What might be cool would be some run away trains-- on fire.
Metro by far, it's like grand bazaars alley flag for the whole map
Needs moar jetz
Metro is the worst map in the game, period.
True story. It might be the worst map in battlefield history to be honest. It's just one big corridor.Ryan wrote:
Metro is the worst map in the game, period.
I didn't even know bazaar had an alley flag until yesterday, with all the retarded scrub spam I never noticed the neon point on more neon explosions and saturation symbol.
Well, Metro of course.
Although if you look from the other side, how would you implement a fighting in a subway? Even in a real life it would be enormously hard to push through a well placed defense (yea, I know this game is not about reality, but still)
Once some team make a breakthrough, there is no way back.
Although if you look from the other side, how would you implement a fighting in a subway? Even in a real life it would be enormously hard to push through a well placed defense (yea, I know this game is not about reality, but still)
Once some team make a breakthrough, there is no way back.
Karkand, because no one plays Metro, but everyone inflicts Karkand on the rest of us.
We're running metro 64 for the lulz.
I got 16k points with 2 kills.
you better believe i only got 2 kills this round. lol
link to round: http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/ba … 186062978/
I got 16k points with 2 kills.
you better believe i only got 2 kills this round. lol
link to round: http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/ba … 186062978/
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
The only good part of the map may be the park and the street area (the sections on the ends of the corridor)Roc18 wrote:
True story. It might be the worst map in battlefield history to be honest. It's just one big corridor.Ryan wrote:
Metro is the worst map in the game, period.
Worst spam evar.
