Well, the political stuff that happened here did get noticed well by the newsFatherTed wrote:
and scott walker!! (god bless)War Man wrote:
Dairy products and beer.AussieReaper wrote:
What is Wisconsin famous for?
No we did it pretty goodMacbeth wrote:
White people in AUS need to manifest their destiny better.Cybargs wrote:
too many in redfern (suburb in sydney). They usually bum around redfern and central station.Macbeth wrote:
How many does AUS have and what do you they with/for them? Here in the U.S. we keep our natives in poverty on reservations.
More like they keep themselves on reservations in poverty...Macbeth wrote:
How many does AUS have and what do they do with/for them? Here in the U.S. we keep our natives in poverty on reservations.
Before you could.FatherTed wrote:
can you keep them as pets?
You've only meet a couple.Cybargs wrote:
Before you could.FatherTed wrote:
can you keep them as pets?
Wisconsin is more known for chat women too.
I agree though I still think the U.S. government should at least remove the carrot...FEOS wrote:
More like they keep themselves on reservations in poverty...Macbeth wrote:
How many does AUS have and what do they do with/for them? Here in the U.S. we keep our natives in poverty on reservations.
Clearly for another thread...Macbeth wrote:
I agree though I still think the U.S. government should at least remove the carrot...FEOS wrote:
More like they keep themselves on reservations in poverty...Macbeth wrote:
How many does AUS have and what do they do with/for them? Here in the U.S. we keep our natives in poverty on reservations.
I met a woman from Wisconsin once. Least I think it was a woman...War Man wrote:
You've only meet a couple.Cybargs wrote:
Before you could.FatherTed wrote:
can you keep them as pets?
Wisconsin is more known for chat women too.
facebook photos are more than enough to judge.War Man wrote:
You've only meet a couple.Cybargs wrote:
Before you could.FatherTed wrote:
can you keep them as pets?
Wisconsin is more known for chat women too.
Indians I think he is referring to.FEOS wrote:
Clearly for another thread...Macbeth wrote:
I agree though I still think the U.S. government should at least remove the carrot...FEOS wrote:
More like they keep themselves on reservations in poverty...
But I'd like to know what "carrot" you're referring to.
You are talking to someone who doesn't use facebook, ya never know if the hot chicks here don't use facebook man.Cybargs wrote:
facebook photos are more than enough to judge.War Man wrote:
You've only meet a couple.Cybargs wrote:
Before you could.
Wisconsin is more known for chat women too.
Last edited by War Man (2011-09-19 21:27:19)
No most hotter looking chicks would use facebook to show themselves off. sigh warman you gotta get out more.War Man wrote:
You are talking to someone who doesn't use facebook, ya never know if the hot chicks don't use facebook man.Cybargs wrote:
facebook photos are more than enough to judge.War Man wrote:
You've only meet a couple.
War Man wrote:
Kangaroos and abnormal people, yep that sums it up.
War Man wrote:
Indians I think he is referring to.FEOS wrote:
Clearly for another thread...Macbeth wrote:
I agree though I still think the U.S. government should at least remove the carrot...
But I'd like to know what "carrot" you're referring to.
They're red, not orange.FatherTed wrote:
but indians aren't carrots i really dont
Carrots are a vegetable, not a race.FatherTed wrote:
reported for racism
The tax benefits, the payments from the Native American trust fund, the occasional supporting their lifestyle. Stuff like that that keeps them on the reservations and in poverty rather than giving them incentive to leave. Like that story about the U.S. government (or Canadian, one of those two) spending half a billion to relocate a tribe than to an area suitable for them to keep their lifestyle since the whole global warming thing was going to wipe out their village.FEOS wrote:
Clearly for another thread...Macbeth wrote:
I agree though I still think the U.S. government should at least remove the carrot...FEOS wrote:
More like they keep themselves on reservations in poverty...
But I'd like to know what "carrot" you're referring to.
Recommend you start a thread about this, because I think you might be somewhat misinformed about whether those benefits extend beyond the reservation or not...Macbeth wrote:
The tax benefits, the payments from the Native American trust fund, the occasional supporting their lifestyle. Stuff like that that keeps them on the reservations and in poverty rather than giving them incentive to leave. Like that story about the U.S. government (or Canadian, one of those two) spending half a billion to relocate a tribe than to an area suitable for them to keep their lifestyle since the whole global warming thing was going to wipe out their village.FEOS wrote:
Clearly for another thread...Macbeth wrote:
I agree though I still think the U.S. government should at least remove the carrot...
But I'd like to know what "carrot" you're referring to.
Believe I recall there was one, and why did you facepalm me when I was correct?FEOS wrote:
Recommend you start a thread about this, because I think you might be somewhat misinformed about whether those benefits extend beyond the reservation or not...Macbeth wrote:
The tax benefits, the payments from the Native American trust fund, the occasional supporting their lifestyle. Stuff like that that keeps them on the reservations and in poverty rather than giving them incentive to leave. Like that story about the U.S. government (or Canadian, one of those two) spending half a billion to relocate a tribe than to an area suitable for them to keep their lifestyle since the whole global warming thing was going to wipe out their village.FEOS wrote:
Clearly for another thread...
But I'd like to know what "carrot" you're referring to.
yeah FEOS, he was correct!War Man wrote:
Believe I recall there was one, and why did you facepalm me when I was correct?
I would have to change my avatar first and that's something I can't do right nowFEOS wrote:
Recommend you start a thread about this, because I think you might be somewhat misinformed about whether those benefits extend beyond the reservation or not...Macbeth wrote:
The tax benefits, the payments from the Native American trust fund, the occasional supporting their lifestyle. Stuff like that that keeps them on the reservations and in poverty rather than giving them incentive to leave. Like that story about the U.S. government (or Canadian, one of those two) spending half a billion to relocate a tribe than to an area suitable for them to keep their lifestyle since the whole global warming thing was going to wipe out their village.FEOS wrote:
Clearly for another thread...
But I'd like to know what "carrot" you're referring to.
Last edited by Macbeth (2011-09-19 21:40:59)
