I need to get some new lenses.
^ 50mm 1.8. Go.
People always talk about these 50mm's, but are they worth getting if you never do portraits?
50mm 1.8 is a handy lens. 50mm 1.4 is better, 1.2 even better.
For general use 35 or 28mm is more useful in my experience.
Now the bottom has dropped out of the film market I think I'll buy some useless old lenses at rock bottom prices.
90-105 is best for portraits really. I should get a prime of one of those, a PC shift lens, a proper fisheye etc etc.
For general use 35 or 28mm is more useful in my experience.
Now the bottom has dropped out of the film market I think I'll buy some useless old lenses at rock bottom prices.
90-105 is best for portraits really. I should get a prime of one of those, a PC shift lens, a proper fisheye etc etc.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-08-28 02:28:43)
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
I just got suckered into taking pictures at a friend's wedding next Saturday
That's a big deal. If you get it wrong they will remember that forever. No pressure.
But, no, have fun. Are you doing it as a gift? That's a very generous gift.
But, no, have fun. Are you doing it as a gift? That's a very generous gift.
...
He offered me $100 but I don't really care what or if I get anything cause this is the first time I've actually been asked to do some "official" photography.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Went to the Bingham Canyon copper mine today;
to give an idea how big that dump truck is,
to give an idea how big that dump truck is,
yah you look skinnier with the telezoom lens. So gents, if you wanna emphasize your big muscles, use the wide angle. hehehehheheheDilbert_X wrote:
90-105 is best for portraits really. I should get a prime of one of those, a PC shift lens, a proper fisheye etc etc.
Or utilize liquify in PS.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
yah you look skinnier with the telezoom lens. So gents, if you wanna emphasize your big muscles, use the wide angle. hehehehheheheDilbert_X wrote:
90-105 is best for portraits really. I should get a prime of one of those, a PC shift lens, a proper fisheye etc etc.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
13urnzz, you don't have Flickr pro?
Portraits, not pics of yourself in the mirror for anonymous gay hook-up sites.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
yah you look skinnier with the telezoom lens. So gents, if you wanna emphasize your big muscles, use the wide angle. hehehehheheheDilbert_X wrote:
90-105 is best for portraits really. I should get a prime of one of those, a PC shift lens, a proper fisheye etc etc.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
yes, i do. for three years now . ..west-phoenix-az wrote:
13urnzz, you don't have Flickr pro?
Why are your pics limited to 1024?
i've been uploading them 1920x1200. i see them at 1920x1200.west-phoenix-az wrote:
Why are your pics limited to 1024?
i don't believe i'm the one who's limited, looking at my photos . . .
Last edited by 13urnzz (2011-08-29 08:22:11)
I choose not to put full resolution images on photo sharing sites.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I can view other peoples pictures at larger than 1024. All of your pictures that I looked at only go up to 1024. Are you sure it's not a setting you can change?13urnzz wrote:
i've been uploading them 1920x1200. i see them at 1920x1200.west-phoenix-az wrote:
Why are your pics limited to 1024?
i don't believe i'm the one who's limited, looking at my photos . . .
?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Are you Pro? Logged in?
Here is what I get:
Here is what I get:
it is a setting. it's one i'm not willing to change. add me as a contact . . .west-phoenix-az wrote:
Are you sure it's not a setting you can change?
who said anything about gay hookup sites? i think your subconscious is trying to tell you something. hello mc flyDilbert_X wrote:
Portraits, not pics of yourself in the mirror for anonymous gay hook-up sites.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
yah you look skinnier with the telezoom lens. So gents, if you wanna emphasize your big muscles, use the wide angle. hehehehheheheDilbert_X wrote:
90-105 is best for portraits really. I should get a prime of one of those, a PC shift lens, a proper fisheye etc etc.
Xbone Stormsurgezz