Which do you use when writing dates? Do you naturally write the one you pick or do you edit afterward?
I naturally use BC and AD and don't edit.
I naturally use BC and AD and don't edit.
BCE and CE are the standard use in academia.Cheez wrote:
Honestly not seen CE/BCE outside hipster atheists on the Interwebs.
Depends on the institution really.Superior Mind wrote:
BCE and CE are the standard use in academia.Cheez wrote:
Honestly not seen CE/BCE outside hipster atheists on the Interwebs.
Ironic, though, as they still reference the time of Christ.Superior Mind wrote:
Ok, for a secular institution. Maybe a Catholic school might use ad/bc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Zero_(album)Hurricane2k9 wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Zero_(album)AussieReaper wrote:
BCE and CE
There was no year zero.
The year 1 is just used as a turning point. Before common era, common era. It's not like the academic world is going to invent a new calendar all together.FEOS wrote:
Ironic, though, as they still reference the time of Christ.Superior Mind wrote:
Ok, for a secular institution. Maybe a Catholic school might use ad/bc
Last edited by Superior Mind (2011-08-20 07:02:25)
Stupid February.Superior Mind wrote:
e: it's a fallacy of our shitty Gregorian calendar. What the fuck is a leap year? Why can't we just have a more accurate calendar?
Silent r's are ghey.AussieReaper wrote:
Stupid February.Superior Mind wrote:
e: it's a fallacy of our shitty Gregorian calendar. What the fuck is a leap year? Why can't we just have a more accurate calendar?
I know what a leap year is, I meant what is it as in what's the deal with it.AussieReaper wrote:
Stupid February.Superior Mind wrote:
e: it's a fallacy of our shitty Gregorian calendar. What the fuck is a leap year? Why can't we just have a more accurate calendar?
Umm... really?Superior Mind wrote:
I know what a leap year is, I meant what is it as in what's the deal with it.AussieReaper wrote:
Stupid February.Superior Mind wrote:
e: it's a fallacy of our shitty Gregorian calendar. What the fuck is a leap year? Why can't we just have a more accurate calendar?
If we went by a thirteen month lunar calendar, I believe we'd all be generally less confused about the cosmos.
Kind of makes the "less confused about the cosmos" thing a bit ironic, no?Jay wrote:
Umm... really?Superior Mind wrote:
I know what a leap year is, I meant what is it as in what's the deal with it.AussieReaper wrote:
Stupid February.
If we went by a thirteen month lunar calendar, I believe we'd all be generally less confused about the cosmos.
We have leap days because the rotation of the Earth around the Sun is not precisely 365 days... If we didn't have leap years, eventually you'd have winter in July. Not a terrible thing I guess, but it would confuse the shit out of people that depend on the season for their living: farmers. If they plant too early or too late, their yields will be bad.
A lot journals and other publications are neutral on it. /shrugsSuperior Mind wrote:
Ok, for a secular institution. Maybe a Catholic school might use ad/bc
The R is silent now?FEOS wrote:
Silent r's are ghey.AussieReaper wrote:
Stupid February.Superior Mind wrote:
e: it's a fallacy of our shitty Gregorian calendar. What the fuck is a leap year? Why can't we just have a more accurate calendar?
I don't see how a 13 month calendar would mess anything up. I think you guys just misunderstand me.FEOS wrote:
Kind of makes the "less confused about the cosmos" thing a bit ironic, no?Jay wrote:
Umm... really?Superior Mind wrote:
I know what a leap year is, I meant what is it as in what's the deal with it.
If we went by a thirteen month lunar calendar, I believe we'd all be generally less confused about the cosmos.
We have leap days because the rotation of the Earth around the Sun is not precisely 365 days... If we didn't have leap years, eventually you'd have winter in July. Not a terrible thing I guess, but it would confuse the shit out of people that depend on the season for their living: farmers. If they plant too early or too late, their yields will be bad.
Not when you look at it from the agrarian perspective, which is arguably why we started keeping track of time to begin with: to normalize growing seasons. That has more to do with solar profession than lunar progression.Superior Mind wrote:
I don't see how a 13 month calendar would mess anything up. I think you guys just misunderstand me.FEOS wrote:
Kind of makes the "less confused about the cosmos" thing a bit ironic, no?Jay wrote:
Umm... really?
We have leap days because the rotation of the Earth around the Sun is not precisely 365 days... If we didn't have leap years, eventually you'd have winter in July. Not a terrible thing I guess, but it would confuse the shit out of people that depend on the season for their living: farmers. If they plant too early or too late, their yields will be bad.
Lunar calendars are much more relavent to the human experience of time.
the moon doesnt have any bearing on the sun. The sun is important, much more so than the tides.Superior Mind wrote:
Way to contribute to the thread.Jay wrote:
Write a petition.
If you can't understand how the phases of the moon are more apparent than our position around the sun, then you must have never looked up at night.