slowjetsareslow
Pages: 1 … 214 215 216 217 218 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
i hope there will be 2 player jets with laser bombs
Everything looks good except the jets need to be ten times faster.
yeah that too...menzo wrote:
i hope there will be 2 player jets with laser bombs
loved the Su-34
Also who was our little robot friend?
Battlefield Bad Company 3menzo wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDDfPxF3EFE
good one chief.Roc18 wrote:
Battlefield Bad Company 3menzo wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDDfPxF3EFE
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
They are slow, but that could be because of map size. If the maps are significantly smaller than BF2 then they have to make the jets slower else you'd be at the other end in seconds.Trotskygrad wrote:
slowjetsareslow
One of the drawbacks of making a game for both PC and console...
But still, even with slow jets, the game looks fucking immense.
Theres still dolphin diving. Game will suck.
Learn to kill people who do that.Spearhead wrote:
Theres still dolphin diving. Game will suck.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
Bomb disposal robot by the looks of it.Laika wrote:
Also who was our little robot friend?
I'm not sure slow jets is necessarily a bad thing. Might lead to better dogfights, allows them to have more pilots in the air, gives more people a chance to fly.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
They are slow, but that could be because of map size. If the maps are significantly smaller than BF2 then they have to make the jets slower else you'd be at the other end in seconds.Trotskygrad wrote:
slowjetsareslow
One of the drawbacks of making a game for both PC and console...
But still, even with slow jets, the game looks fucking immense.
Last edited by Spearhead (2011-08-16 09:07:49)
eh, the only defense of jets is their speedSpearhead wrote:
I'm not sure slow jets is necessarily a bad thing.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
They are slow, but that could be because of map size. If the maps are significantly smaller than BF2 then they have to make the jets slower else you'd be at the other end in seconds.Trotskygrad wrote:
slowjetsareslow
One of the drawbacks of making a game for both PC and console...
But still, even with slow jets, the game looks fucking immense.
they *should* have no armor at all, only like 3 30mm shells should bring one down.
Jets were too fast in BF2. Map size was a factor as well.Spearhead wrote:
I'm not sure slow jets is necessarily a bad thing.Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
They are slow, but that could be because of map size. If the maps are significantly smaller than BF2 then they have to make the jets slower else you'd be at the other end in seconds.Trotskygrad wrote:
slowjetsareslow
One of the drawbacks of making a game for both PC and console...
But still, even with slow jets, the game looks fucking immense.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
lol at the jets being too fast in bf2
In relation to the map sizes, yes they were.gurdeep wrote:
lol at the jets being too fast in bf2
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
k
if you were high up you could fly to the to other side in like 4seconds
From a gameplay perspective it might lead to better dogfights, more chaos, and it gives more people the chance to ease their way into it. Hopefully they will balance it so the best pilots are allowed to do well without dominating the foodchain.Trotskygrad wrote:
eh, the only defense of jets is their speed
they *should* have no armor at all, only like 3 30mm shells should bring one down.
The A10, su34 were about the right speed.
Where was the Mk23 or USP?M.O.A.B wrote:
I spied some new guns. SCAR-H and a MK23 or USP.
Jet speed was good in BF2.
Pages: 1 … 214 215 216 217 218 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread